Member Info for ERV1

the psychology attached to the wearing of red speaks volumes. In light of what has occurred in recent years at around the time of the Mansion House speech, most notably in 2016 and 2017, a group of women storming a building uninvited in their red frocks, this year, are the ones who should seek professional help.

"Posh dinner" this time, stopping folks going about their everyday business in London, another time, what comes next?

Further, how can anyone say for sure whether peaceful protestation will remain just so?

precisely, does the right to peaceful protest include for storming into buildings uninvited, in law? Does peaceful protest include for making others feel threatened, in law? In a threatening situation we all would act instinctively, and that can often result in out of character actions. Mr Field was not the instigator, she was, and she wasn't acting out of character as it reads like she is of the belief that her calling in life is to carry out what I personally perceive to be unacceptable actions. Then what? She plays the old victim card? The playing of that card is becoming rather too common place, for all the wrong reasons, imv.

Hi Bruce, haven't looked at the express in a long while. My immediate instinct on seeing the incident was, he did right, as we all know it is a very mad world that we inhabit. Oh and the petition to abolish the TV licence fee is to be heard on 15th July.

Oh Wassatt, big, big hugs. Have you explored all pain relief options? x

Alternatively, had a female acted instinctively and done the same as Mr Field would the reactions have been the same?

In my book, the answer to that is NO.

the terminology used by Mr Mercer "recalibrate your sensitivities" ... never more true in the current climate - here, there n everywhere.

WSG

good morning, big hugs, hope you had a comfortable night. x

"nor" not or

Good morning, Lord Polonius, Act 1 Scene 3 and what many of us were told by our dads "Neither a borrower or a lender be" and "To thine own self be true" precis on thinking out loud, as ego consoling research fools nobody... Talking out loud stuff.
Persistent highlighting by one, as to what they consider salient in relation to wealth, serves to demonstrate their own unspectacular financial self ... talking out loud.

Clearly as we don't have a constitution, we have no First Amendment equivalent, so in pc world it would appear that even when rule breaking has not occurred, something untoward happens... I just wonder what my own dad would think of it all.

Had the longs chats with the locals re the single currency adoption and the current state of affairs, told em about the claptrap text of a.n.o. on a UK online forum ... they don't use the f word ...

The red frock incident = he was in the right, imv. Thinking out loud stuff.

Thank you for sharing, much appreciated.

good measure, having met a good few LSE posters when AGM'ing - all very honest, open and likeable characters - I am a "real" person ...

for guessing what the dearests comments about a.n.o. were - very utt mode

good morning Wassatt, big e-hug and cuddles and xxxx

at 10:11, spot on

sending you e-kisses xxxxx and e-cuddles in abundance

that's ok then, as I am

Wassatt, MOS is right, you're not wasting your time as many read you and don't comment. Some of us would just like to give you a great big hug.

maybe they are all adjective'd out? As long as it takes for em to drum up more hypothetical claptrap is my bet, cos their reliance on google is forever to the fore - read like they never go past the garden gate.

as long as it's a quality vino. Yes, that friend I mentioned is still on the slow road - much longer than anticipated. Ditto, the treats on them - whoopeeeee. Enjoy as the wine list will be getting some stick, and the Italian owner doesn't even need to ask the madre what she'd like - ha.