Member Info for ERV1

Good morning to you, keep calm and carry on ... It reads like lots of folks have no concept or experience of working under a LOI until the creases are ironed out, imv.

What was your crime?

Wids, have you got abracadabra knowledge to share then?

is communism. The stockmarket is a no-no in that world is it not?

livestock. What did these posts of yours have to do with Lloyds then?

Friday 14th June 11.07
Boris 1/5 on
Uk leave the EU without withdrawal agreement in place. 2/1

15th June 13.38
Paddy power price change
Next Prime Minister = Boris Johnson 1/7
No Deal Brexit in 2019 = Yes (UK leave the EU in 2019 without Withdrawal Agreement in place) 21/10

Go on, tell us all ...

and grammatical correctness as opposed to gobbledy gook aren't a science either

that's where we all went wrong? AHO is a remainer, Tim is not ... Thinking out loud stuff. "They" can do fly-by protesting at Headingley, that is considered acceptable, yet matters that matter and that are very relevant to the banking sector are not acceptable in this space ... Other than the right to remove/delete within the t&c's of LSE, under CA2003 there is no law-breaking, or have I missed something? Maybe the moderator for LLOYDS would like to share their remit?

and "If" come to mind Oxo42 ... oh what a wonderful world, eh?

Tim Martin clearly believes in not missing an opportunity, check his RNS content today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13_nXuJ6dX8

just keep singing from the same pages ...

one of my fathers plays, that Joseph Locke one ...

Good morning, hope you managed at least a few hours of comfortable undisturbed rest. Big hugs xx

well I consider it "naughty" when a new site does not contain all of the historical RNS's on a multitude of stocks - certainly not on the AiM stocks. LSE wanted feedback historically, I raised this point of issue and was told my comments would be passed to the correct department ... 3 months later ... So maybe instead of employing moderators, the LSE should go back to the drawing board in getting their own house in order. Let's not forget the fundamentals LSE.

So if the share chat logo depicts 26 posts, yet only 13 are showing, have 13 been removed? Nurseries aren't allowed to use the word "naughty" when talking to children, by all accounts ... yet it's fine to deploy the equivalent on a forum for adults.... Sign of the times or what?

Boomer, thanks for sharing the links and your knowledge on the subject, much appreciated.

Boomer, so calculating your carbon footprint and doing your best to off-set by various methods - am I wasting my time with the tree planting over many years? Geology related never got my attention, so I'll admit that I'm ignorant and clearly you aren't, however your posts have increased my interest in learning to understand more. What, if anything, should we all be doing?

does the planting of 1000's of trees cover your carbon footprint when you are a frequent flyer? Without being a tree-hugging nutcase, if one does everything within ones power to contribute to a better environment, then for the majority I guess it becomes "what else can we do?" Reading some of your historical posts I sought to establish whether we as a family do enough and was surprised to learn that our emissions would have been significantly higher when we were working - work miles on the road, years ago, far outweighed our air miles in current times.

for the purpose of equality, why not report everybody who dares to mention anything that annoys or upsets you?

Start with the one who peddles communism ...

laughing is where it's at, otherwise we'd all be carted off - surely?

or even "say" not "said" if we're going down that road ...