Member Info for elrico

Have a I missed a podcast? :)

If the research is accurate https://lemminginvestor.substack.com/p/skinbiotherapeutics-plc-004 then we start with a greater product portfolio from the SkinBiotix platform, NOT JUST the anti-ageing lysate.

IMHO, the timeline offers reasonable clues, especially when aligned with Croda/Sederma activities and what SBTX has said in regulatory news.

Caveats REMAIN IN PLAY! Not to be confused with the algo caveats, because I was dealing with speculative data, not publicly available data.

Hi Cliostock,

Yes, there’s much to digest.

You can lead a Shetland to water, but ...

Perhaps a few clues are in order. :)
https://lemminginvestor.substack.com/p/skinbiotherapeutics-plc-004

From the material I have read, AquaeSulis's daughter is an astute operator. I am sure she is well-tuned into events and likely will see her reward in due course. Likewise, her father is no lemming!

Have a fantastic weekend all.

Hi Aqua,

Passed to Stuart. I know he welcomes such feedback.

Successful Companies pool ideas and test to see what works best for them.

Wow, Nicola Sturgeon! That’s as cruel as can be! :)

Thanks, Farris.

TBH, I wasn't expecting this reaction to a spot of kite flying. :)

#EV #Lithium editorial featuring #ALL $AVZ #CATL $CXO $INR $MVST $LKE $LTHM $LICY
https://smallcompanychampion.substack.com/p/electric-vehicle-revolution-part/comments?justPublished=true&embeddedPostPublications=&autoSharedOnTwitter=false

https://twitter.com/LEMMINGINVESTOR/status/1577749943992963072
Table contents
Market Trends
Supply and Demand Issues
Lithium or Sodium Batteries?
Companies of Interest (Battery Supply-Chain)
Lithium Miners

As early as the 8 Feb, Biden said the quiet part out loud. Four mins in. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLb0QeCQF_I

Why would Putin destroy the only real asset he has, thus destroying the best leverage at a time when Germany is putting pressure on a resolution before winter bites?

I don't watch any legacy media anymore because I am tired of being mistaken for a mushroom. But, I wonder how many have reminded the public of Biden's threat?

So much for caring about "climate change."

Perhaps the better answers would be. You don't need to explain it with malevolence if you can explain it with stupidity! It's about your level, Phat.

There you go with the lies, Phat. I speak to Toyin more than I do my wife these days. I know the difference between a plastic scouser and a Geordie. Keep it factual, and perhaps a little less emotional would be helpful.

Phat,

You and the three that voted must be in your own little bubble.

Truss, and Biden-omics are in play, plus the USA sabotage of the Nordstream pipeline, all hinder all hopes of a market recovery this side of sanity. So, by all means, you crack on with your childish digs and threats. It is to be expected of people with a less mature attitude to life.

My offer still stands if you are man enough to step from behind your warrior keyboard.

Phat,

I am willing to meet you and discuss the situation with you. You have my details, just let me know 48 hours in advance, and I will do my best to accommodate a meeting with you. In addition, you have my phone number in one of those emails we have exchanged. Feel free to call me.

Now, on to your twisting the truth to suit your narrative.

You claim I have claimed, " special algo that was spot on."
Oh, really! Do you care to provide a reference to this effect, or is this another one of those..." too sensitive for a public forum, I'll show you when we meet! You know this allegation to be a lie. It is a Leftwaffe tactic we see playing out every day. It is no longer about the truth when you lie. You know, and everyone that has had an eye on the editorial will know you have lied. Do you not see this weakens your hand? Especially going forward because you make it difficult to believe you because you lie and do not address issues investors request you to clarify, issues which you brought into the public arena. Have some dignity and stick with the truth, please.

It is rather silly to call into question my research on SBTX. Given the historical multi-bag events. I have published editorials on the Company since its IPO. The only misstep I have made is the editorial on the algorithm possibilities, for which I had issued caveats, which I have already discussed.

I cannot speak to you or your friends and family who decided to sell other than to say if they have sold on your advice, then you may have an awkward future ahead as and when the Company delivers on its strategy. I know what that pressure is like, so I have some sympathy for you.

You claim, "anyone that has a different opinion to yourself you try and attack from different angles and never hit the nail on the head."

Where is my attack on you? I thought we were having a discussion!
Do you mean questioning you? (SA's lie).
correcting your misinformation? (Croda/Sederma).
Or do you mean me plugging the gaps in your research, the same research you likely advise F&M to sell on?

In my world, a CEO is responsible for a poor investment if said CEO has provided the market with incorrect information and data, has deliberately misinformed the market, committed fraud, or lied, and the market acted in good faith and lost money on the investment. IMHO, you are culpable, not Stuart. You need to own your timings and decisions and stop looking to blame other people for your decisions.

You're an intelligent man; I know this much because of your job. But, your mistakes litter these forums, as do your tactics to sully people you deem responsible for "your" actions. This is why I am confident in my only crime against you when I argue you are being emotionally driven. I know I am not alone in this opinion.

You may view this as another attack from another angle. It is about truth seeking and debate, nothing more.

Phat,

Are you having another emotional outburst? Are you really resorting to threats now! Tut, tut! This investmenting malarkey really isn’t for you, is it!

So we all understand the rules.

A: Is it the case that if anyone challenger you to provide evidence to support your allegations.

B: Anyone provides or reminds you of your poor memory.

C: poor research

D: Corrections

You threaten to provide personal details such as where I live on LSE?

My address is a matter of public record. Feel free. I’m not so fragile, or emotional.

You realise you have unwittingly shown your hand. As fools often do.

There no Specsavers in Blackley, or Hilldale. The nearest in a mile up Rochdale Rd. However, I prefer the quality and service of Vision Express over Specsavers.

Feel free to pop around for a brew.

Mol,

SlimBiome is likely produced by Zeon for the India market.

https://youtu.be/rdH8IQq45JQ

Croda/Sederma I guess you missed this, Phat!
You need a visit to specsavers! :)

Remind us what SA said about Croda revenues landing by H1 again!

If you insist on investing on emotional turmoil and poor memory you are doomed to fail.

We are still waiting for the lies you claim SA has committed! Was this another emotional outburst, Phat!!

Phat,

Constantly looking through the rear view mirror often results in a crash. You miss the bleeding obvious, even though the backseat driver has already offered detailed of the road ahead.

As Toyin says. You need to make a decision to believe Stuart’s detailed explanation or not and act accordingly. Stuart will stand or fall on his and the boards punt not to take the easy win, for greater riches. We will know soon enough.

Belgrano,

Thanks for your support and understanding.

Oleric is a typical inexperienced PI. Unwilling to take ownership of his mistakes and seeks to blame anyone but himself.

Before I had the sense to filter him, I counted the use of my name in his posts no fewer than nine times in seven posts, not including the title where my name appears repeatedly. If you venture to his post history, I would be shocked if my name does not appear at least half a dozen times and/or make reference to something I have said. Is anyone brave enough to venture? :)

He previously argued I ramped two shares he owned, which were disasters. I am guessing they were SBTX and OPTI.
I have no idea of his entry, but I am sure I first wrote about OPTI at around 55p; after that, it peaked at 133p. The rest, as they say, is history. I lost faith at around a similar level and was clear of my intentions before I sold and offered my reasons for doing so.

SBTX has been a feature since the IPO at 9p. Yup, it tanked to 5p when COVID struck a hammer blow. However, it recovered, and some, all the way to 78p.

Since I set up the sites, I have had one wipeout. Most, if not all, featured Companies have made gains. There are two or three stragglers that are frustrating, but even so, one of them, ORPH, had more than doubled from 21p to 48p. POLB is the only one that is c50% down, but even so, if you got the shares via an in-specie, they are a free carry if you have the patience to see the play, play out.

I am proud of my record for uncovering early-stage Companies and Zulu-Esq and have a good description of success. Yes, of course, I get it wrong from time to time. But, it comes with the territory, just as resident trolls seeking to take potshots and throw mud, hoping it sticks.

It is a sad period in which we live, where miserable souls like oleric seek to cancel people. It is a measure of the miserable life they lead.

If any of the data provided below I am sure someone will take aim! :)

https://www.smallcompanychampion.uk/