Member Info for Ella10

Evrima announcement
https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/market-news/update-on-investee-company/15469573

Hi BCB,
Interesting find. I haven't digested it all but there is a possible extra $200m payment. Part of the possible additional payments relate to the price of copper which is interesting.
https://www.havilah-resources-projects.com/_files/ugd/6c8cd0_8702ddfa9c734a5eae90a04f9c86471d.pdf

I thought NVS made a remarkably good villain :-). However, anyone buying at these prices may end up with a misguided case of hero worship! WTS.

Missing me already Manx? Nice to hear but I'm not too far away. I've heard Alby is finding retirement a tad boring so you may hear more from him in the near future. He's also got a few mates that are finding retirement boring. They've all got sparkling new electronic devices with some fancy IP addresses. Alby has given them a copy of The Rime of the Ancient Mariner which is keeping them occupied for the moment.

Does anyone know if this was made public?
https://www.invest-botswana.co/seminar/solo-targeting-world-class-base-metal-deposits-in-botswana/

Cattleman,
I think the big selling pressure will be gone in 2 months. FQM drilled over 100,000m in the first year they had Sentinel. A lot of this will have been infill drilling so a bit different to what will initially be required on ARC's Zambian licences. Assuming the deal gets signed, if there is any indication that AA have sufficient motivation to approach the drilling with the same vigour as FQM did, then in my opinion the SP will benefit.

Hi PhilTerd,
I wouldn't stress too much about your English. My English is far from perfect but this board tends to be fairly tolerant. I came across someone recently whose written English was perfect but they seemed to struggle to perform a simple subtraction. Funnily enough they had a background in finance.

The RNS from the 21st Sept 2020 and 23rd Feb 2021 give the details of the two block listings.

Hi Keith,
I totally agree with your comment about outside chance speculation. It may well be just POW moving into line. It would be interesting to see an update on the following summary table for Ditau.
https://www.powermetalresources.com/key-projects-summary/

Hi MH,
Yes, it is interesting. As far as I can tell it is the first time precious metals has been mentioned in this way. I had read the POW RNS but after reading Keith's post I went back and read it again and picked up this little nugget. If I'm mistaken about it being the first mention I hope someone will correct me. I wonder what the turnaround for assays is at the moment.

Is today's RNS the first time POW have mentioned precious metals in relation to Ditau?
'Power Metal Resources plc (LON:POW), the London listed exploration company seeking large-scale metal discoveries across its global project portfolio, announces an update from the Ditau Camp Project ("Ditau" or the "Project") located in southwest Botswana. Ditau is considered prospective for carbonatite hosted rare-earth element ("REE"), base-metal and possible precious-metal mineralisation.'

I can't improve on Keith's fantasy but is this the first time POW have mentioned precious metals in relation to Ditau?
'Power Metal Resources plc (LON:POW), the London listed exploration company seeking large-scale metal discoveries across its global project portfolio, announces an update from the Ditau Camp Project ("Ditau" or the "Project") located in southwest Botswana. Ditau is considered prospective for carbonatite hosted rare-earth element ("REE"), base-metal and possible precious-metal mineralisation.'

They hit the target so that is one positive. If the outcome of the first hole into i10 didn't change the target for the second hole then they were aiming for the edge of the negative magnetic response. From the 19th April RNS
'The first hole will target the core of the magnetic high, while the second hole is designed to test the edge of the negative magnetic response.'
Does this mean that they probably weren't expecting the core to contain carbonatite?

Hi Iky,
To me the RNS doesn't contain any bad news. There are no definitive numbers and no very near term news being promised which may mean folk exiting. I see the access to the historic cores being confirmed as definite good news together with as, analytical says, more zones of copper.

I think that Nyambwezu may have been historically seen as a uranium target.

Thanks FKC,
Sorry for the confusion, I meant DITDD004 which I believe is the second hole in this year's campaign? Yeah, I'm assuming it will complete sometime this week. Do you know if they mentioned what comms they expect to put out on the next holes?

I haven't listen to all the interviews but do we expect to get an RNS when hole 2 at Ditau is completed.

Perhaps we will get a little more info on Manica tomorrow
https://mobile.twitter.com/EmpressRoyalty_/status/1525152655340863488?cxt=HHwWgICwnc2Qt6oqAAAA

Kully - you may wish to repost your thread. I will try to refrain from replying .

I would rather this board was dedicated to discussions about ARCM than about me.
I am going to answer the accusations just this once.
Let me start by saying it is never wise to trust what ANYONE says on a BB. They are very useful sources of info but any info used in your investment case should be fact checked. I have NEVER posted on LSE under another ID ( I realise I cannot prove this to many posters here). I would expect NVS to Know what I have been unimpressed with. I have an email. I realise NVS was in a difficult situation with regard to court cases but...
GLR was the first junior mining/ exploration company that I took an interest in. That is my first link to CB. I had no real prior knowledge of exploration or mining and I have found the subject fascinating. I have also invested in XTR. Anyone who has followed GLR for more than 18months will be aware that I have pulled up CB about certain things in the past. I am still invested in both GLR and XTR but this is AIM and scepticism is a requirement (in my view). I have absolutely no links to MM but having read around the subject and was aware how much the court cases could affect the investment case for ARCM.
My reason for replying specifically to Kully is that I thought the post was great. I have disagreed with many of their posts in the past. I also realise what a tough year it must have been. They were understandably very keen to see the small plant up and producing revenue and the settlement news with regard to this must have been a knock (as there was no news on a deal at that point). Snow White I am not! I tend not to feel a need to defend criticism so don't expect a response on every criticism posted and yes I may receive one or two ;-).
DYOR.