Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
I've got to say, the Q&A section is excellent investor communications. Arguably, it wouldn't be needed if everything always ran smoothly, but that's not realistic in the world of mining juniors anywhere! Well worth the effort for the company to provide considered and informative (albeit, obviously with a pro-Kefi agenda) answers to the constant stream of enquiries (and complaints!) of all flavours they must get.
He's clearly got a problem IMHO. No-one in their right mind would deramp so fervently if they owned any shares. But why waste the time and energy on a share they didn't own, when they could spend that effort on literally anything else? Too easy to imagine he just wants a lower entry. No, I fear, it's a manifestation of mental illness of some sort quite honestly. Sad, but when's all said and done, not the temperament of someone anyone should be listening to. Filter IMO.
Not all events in the present are known to all. Hypothetically, TK finance could already have been completely scuppered by this, but we just don't know it yet. Therein lies a risk. My position is, that situation is unlikely, but who knows what may happen in the future. Anyway, splitting hairs rather!
We will have to see what the market thinks on Monday, but I would have thought most here are already fairly risk-tolerant, or they wouldn't be here in the first place!
AquaeSulis01, as SB_1964 says, of course there is a risk. There's always been a risk. It never went away. This is Africa. But that's a future risk. My point is that, today, I don't see the state of emergency in Amhara unduly disrupting TK finance closure. That's just my opinion though. Everyone must make their own risk calculations for themselves.
Everyone has their own take of course, and I see the usual boring doom-mongers are out in force. Misery loves company so they say. Anyway, my thinking is that the security conditions and arrangements will be quite local to TK, so as long as things stay quiet there, I don't expect this to cause further problems, provided it doesn't spread of course. Also agree that the funding consortium will (if they haven't already) simply decide whether to go forward or not. Surely everyone involved must be getting tired of the endless delays by now.
Or the tone in which it is asked...
"Can see some folks still banging on about placing?
Looks like they did not even bother going through the full year accounts RNS just 4 weeks ago where Management stated we are FULLY funded for next 12 months including exploration work programme for this year."
No offence meant, but you gotta laugh - the post above really did not age well! All-in-all though, not a bad price to get it away at, considering the recent SP.
I imagine he means "irrelevant".
Just poking my nose in to see what's up. No-one knows it seems? On the one-hand, I don't like being spiked, on the other, we're still some way below the price I previously sold out at, so... yeah I dunno! Will see what happens tomorrow I guess.
Respectfully Bishop, you seem rather insecure to me. I appreciate it's not entirely one-sided (I have ajs on filter for starters), but I see that bragging about the size of your trades/profit is a theme in your posts, and it's not a good look in general. Don't forget, there will always be someone with more than you, and in any case, one's worth as a human being is not necessarily linked to one's bank account balance.
You speak as if it is all over. It isn't. It should be just beginning, although I do feel for those who have endured much pain just to get to this point.
HAA does have a point when he says you shouldn't be investing in junior miners if you havn't got the stomach for it. Focusing on getting rich quick, rather than on the very real risks, can be dangerous to your wealth. HAA didn't force anyone to buy shares, nor is he forcing anyone to continue to hold them.
That said, while it's taking it's sweet time coming, TK does look to be "nearly" there. The mood will change quickly once that RNS lands. Annnyyy day now... hopefully!
In your opinion TCM, is this "endless copy/paste trash" that's been "dumped on the boards"? If, in your opinion, it is not, can I assume you now perfectly happy with Rob's posts, as you've now taken to doing the same? If, in your opinion, it is, then why are you posting it?
I'm pretty sure I know the answer, and will filter you soon for being a petty and tiresome hypocrite, but I'd like to give you a chance to prove me wrong first.
The biggest irony is TCM moaning about constructive, relevent posts while contributing nothing of value, positive or negative (apart from generic, tedious, whinging) him/her self. Credit to you Rob for remaining polite with some of these numpties.
TCM - if you don't like Rob's posts, don't read them, or filter him even. I assure you, with or without moderation, others can and will ignore or filter you if you have nothing worthwhile to contribute.
https://xkcd.com/1357/
Lol. If that's the best offer, the company won't be sold, simple as that.
An78uts - check out dictumdedicto's posts: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/dictumdedicto/
Don't know how many here have been through this before. I haven't. My guess is that the best offer will be reccommended by the board to shareholders (essentially saying - this is the best offer we're going to get) and then shareholders would vote on it. It would probably be inadviseable to vote against the board's reccomendations, and in practice wouldn't succeed anyway since JM owns nearly a quarter. I'm uncertain what would happen in an asset sale situation, but I expect that this will be a full company sale in the end.
- Does Calibre still have spare capacity at their mills? If so, then they could delay (or conceivably never) build a mine at La India, saving both the construction time and money.
- Just because Calibre got a good deal buying B2's assets, doesn't mean that similarly great (ie. cheap, for them) deals are currently on the market...
- I agree though that Calibre must be looking at us closely, despite the inherent "eggs-in-a-basket" risk. There's too many synergies for them to discount the possibility entirely.
I am not here to brag about the size of my holding, throw tantrums and sling insults, or show off how clever I am. I merely pointed out that the article is worthless, which it is. If you disagree, by all means use that article and those like it in as part of your investment research. If so, I wish you good luck. I think you gonna need it.
Bragging about the size of your holding and belittling others for the size of theirs, says more about you than about them Bishop. That's all I'll say on the matter.
Computer-generated crap. You should know better than to post it honestly.