Fingers crossed for a Haverion style discvery3 Oct 2025 10:31
GEO has compared the Juno targets to an intrusion-related gold system and benchmarked the opportunity against Havieron in public commentary — the company is explicitly targeting an IRGS-style system.
Geophysics/modeling indicates primary targets start at depth (~~600 m) and a historic deep hole (PHD001) ended short but showed proximal alteration and sulphides — i.e., there is geological reason to expect system-type pathfinder signatures at depth.
Realistic assay outcomes (what labs typically report and what each would mean)
Best case — “Havieron-style” discovery
What assays would show: coherent, multi-metre intervals returning multi-gram gold (e.g. several g/t Au) with associated significant copper (tens of 0.1% up to >0.5–1% Cu in some intervals), plus elevated pathfinder elements (As, Bi, Sb, Te) and sulphur/sulphide abundance.
Middle case — encouraging but not blockbuster
What assays would show: anomalous to modest gold (e.g. 0.5–3 g/t Au in places, narrow high-grade shoots), with spotty copper and pathfinder enrichment; intermittent sulphide zones and alteration but limited continuous width.
Negative / null case
What assays would show: mostly background/trace gold (