RE: Shorts closing ..18 Jun 2023 13:19
The ‘simple maths’ (for the mf as below) then shows a small 10% error when using 2000 bopd & $50.4M revenue, as 2000 bopd will not occur until next month or perhaps August & at which point the $52.87 hedge will have kicked in. The loss of 10% / $5M for the quoted 2000 bopd, would hopefully be compensated by a corresponding increase in the sentiment.
That leaves the next 4 to 8 weeks period flow rates. A good starting point as per leew : ‘June = ? Say 1450 = $ 36.5m revenue’ but July still gets a wee bit crucial as the first 947 bopd are at $52.87/bbl & only 500+ bopd is c.$70/bbl. A wee bit tight but IF a 10% monthly increase can be maintained until GGS is online, then should hopefully scrape through without that massive dilution that Anavio’s offered $7M would bring.
The maths for the Fed Deep are more complicated:
‘.. An estimated 2 billion barrels or more worth of oil has been discovered deep under Natrona & Converse counties in Wyoming. .. Canadian Overseas Petroleum Limited (COPL), commissioned a consultant, Ryder Scott Company, to look at the feasibility of getting at that black gold… Their findings suggest that only a fraction of that oil is recoverable with current technology…”There’s really a misunderstanding between resources and reserves,” Arthur Millholland, COPL’s president, and CEO, said during a call with investors on Monday. It's not just about sucking the oil out of the ground. Pressure must be created to do this. The oil is located deep - deep down. The math on how to accomplish providing that much pressure for pumping at that depth is the issue. This is where it gets difficult with today's current drilling and extracting techniques..’
For the Pi’s hoping to extract some decent sp / mc value using a decent Profit-Earnings ratio, this then gets scuppered IF the Fed Deep maths then requires a significant chunk of the mf profit to initially fund it (be cautious of “3000 bopd horizontal wells”) & with any mf profit furthering expensive drills, the sp is again sliding horizontally across the floor. Would AM then be content with a mf producing 5000 to 7000 bopd and seeing the profit paying off the lenders & so then prop up the PE, or would it again just be full-on… ?
That brings a big question mark to leew’s thinking that the JV is ‘not a last throw’ ie. not necessarily required. The maths suggests otherwise. It shows that AM can do this alone but probably at further cost to the Pi. & that whilst he comfortably retains c.10% on any future options packages, the retail might yet again be funding it. A few more months then imo for (1) earning nice profit from mf & (2) finding out what the next stage of financial planning incurs..