Master - the photo on its own I was not so sure about. But reading the additional comments/research and also ninesandytoes post, I do think it’s an interesting development. I still maintain we need the LP, and I’m not sure this is anything to do with that. But I do see it as a positive.
Would be nice for MB to keep us shareholders (owners of MATD) updated better.
master - I agree this is an interesting development. I’m just trying to work out why such influential people would go over to see MATD at their registered home of IOM.
There was some interesting debate on here earlier. Would be keen to hear further considered views on why they might have travelled over there… MB simply schmoozing them to hope they hand over the LP, or something more? You’d surely think it was the latter.
“It's a BB for everyone doc. You should have realised that way before posting anything. As long as you follow the rules.”
Sorry, Roxy. Don’t quite understand what you mean? Are the rules that you can stalk another member, go over to another board they frequent and disrupt it?
“It’s kiddies hour again on here, " final warning" you will be sent on the "naughty step" if you dont do as i say PMSL, hilarious.”
The warning was more for WOS to stop ruining another board so it doesn’t spread here. I’m not the one who has gone over to another board disrupting but it seems none of you are too bothered. Feedback taken and glad you to hear you wouldn’t be too bothered if other posters now come over to the MATD board and clog it up.
My tenth message on LSE today. Probably about 5 minutes worth of time to write them. Had a lovely weekend with a big family celebration and didn’t feel the need to stalk someone on here once!
Ps, looking forward to this amazing additional news. Long and strong MATD and can’t wait to become a millionaire.
WOS back again on the SNG board disrupting because I’m there.
WOS - you are not spoiling anything for me over there. You are ruining a board for other investors. Really poor form. Do you really want members from other boards to come on here and disrupt?
Remember, all is fair in love and war. But it’s our war, not theirs.
RE: BOOOOM For Q2 2003 - Mr Master Research Update1 May 2023 16:41
ID78: “I’d suggest that Master might be more selective now in what is shared after (admitting) a mistake last time”
Well hang on a minute, when you say admit, the info was wrong so he couldn’t not admit it!?
And to be clear, my issue has never been that master was wrong. We all make mistakes. The problem was that he shot people down severely for doubting what he was saying, calling people stupid. Even those that were asking honest questions were also made to feel stupid. That’s why he should have apologised.
To answer your question, if he has something worthwhile and categorically true, I’ll be thankful. Although I still think it’s very odd to withhold this supposed important information.
RE: BOOOOM For Q2 2003 - Mr Master Research Update1 May 2023 16:12
“And I'm sorry for lowering myself to the levels of curious and doc,”
You went to a much lower level, whether it be the foul mouth or posting on another board.
“…we can see they are negative and don't like info sharing…”
No information has been shared. Master on a power trip and wanting people to wait. He lost a lot of credibility last time. Brave to once again claim to have game changing info. If it’s a damp squib or wrong again, he’ll have none left at all.
Fingers crossed he’s on the money this time and this goes to 15p soon. I can’t wait to get out of this share.