Member Info for Discodave4561

Down to 78p

Thought someone next door said it was going to 150p!

Apparently up to about 2 million UK businesses have been mis-sold energy via energy brokers.

Now given the recent landmark case the litigation claims floodgates have poured open.And Sparky reckons that YU has zero risks!, on another planet

https://bmmagazine.co.uk/news/court-of-appeal-ruling-empowers-businesses-to-reclaim-hidden-energy-broker-fees/

Gas back down to 82p, thought the self proclaimed world expert here said it was going to 150p!.

Can’t argue with that I suppose.

Treven

Thanks for your reply.

As you can see from the chart source I posted (stockcharts) that there is clearly a gap as I stated.

However, I’ve also checked trader view (link below) and a few other charting sites and they don’t show the same gap, so my sincere apologies. I won’t use stockcharts from now on (it’s easier on their app to look at charts when using a phone).

When on my PC I tend to use tradingview so should have double checked, thanks.

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=LSE%3AYU.

Sparky Pal

Why do you keep posting about doing “test” trades and saying buys are posted as sells when it’s only myself that’s challenged your has mentioned about this, and that it’s all utter lies.

You posted ages ago I was filtered then started to reply to things I’d posted. Then you posted you wasn’t going to post again and within days you carried on posting, your history is all there for folks to see.

You are clearly just an habitual liar IMO.

Sparky Pal

Copying my use of headers now I see, not very imaginative are you, we’ll apart from posting up lies .

This is getting very boring now.

Post up relevant stuff or go play somewhere else :)

Sparky Pal

PMSL

I’m going nowhere.

Anyway, back to Yu, what’s this big news that’s coming?, post up what you think, why and evidence it if you can.

Everytime a TU approached you have previously posted they will be doing a £10m buyback, an acquisition, a move to Ftse etc etc. but so far sweet fa despite their cash.

That said I agree they could do a small buyback, but don’t forget the more income they achieve the more pressure on working capital requirements and their liquidity covenant (yes I’m repeating myself but it’s factual and can’t be ignored - even though you do ignore it because you don’t understand what liquidity means).

Bored of you thinking this should be rated like TEP, not happening anytime soon IMO.

Sorry that Treven, not Tree now, bloody phone.

Tree now

Believe it was 14th/15th April, didn’t quite fill it in its attempt in May.

Is that how you see it? happy to be corrected but that’s an unfilled gap IMO

Sparky Pal

PMSL

You are so clueless it’s frightening

Go think up some more lies to post up, what’s this big news that’s coming up?, still waiting for you to take up my bet about peace in Ukraine!.

You must hate it when someone sees you for what you really are :)

Https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=yu.l

Sparky Pal

It’s obvious that I’m not filtered, you’ve posted before I was filtered and you weren’t posting again, yet clearly it was all lies too.

You always return to form, whenever I catch you with your trousers down posting false or incorrect info you resort to personal insults and false accusations.

You are now posting that something big is on the way, so post up what you think is big…….its all cheap ramping. Yes they may declare some buyback next month, an acquisition of some kind, but then again they may not. Put up what you are implying instead of making very cheap comments with absolutely nowt to support them.

Shall I challenge you again about why aren’t you topping up if so cheap!. Folks can check for themselves, you’ve never topped up, well correction you posted you’d topped up immediately after I’d challenged you on this before, but for years and years not a word about any purchase or any sale. I fervently believe that you don’t hold anymore, yes you did buy ages ago and made decent money when you sold, but now it’s all about ego feeding, just like your boast that you know more about the Middle East, Ukraine and Asia than anyone on this planet!.

You don’t post on ADVFN or here on any other of your holdings, just incessantly ramping YU, does make one wonder why?

Sparky Pal

You do make me laugh, whenever I catch you with your trousers down you start with the personal insults and false accusations.

I’ve never invested or posted on the CNA thread, I’ve only one account here and ADVFN, I’ve never worked for YU or JPM, and I’ve never been threatened by any solicitors. I’m not a stalker I just hate and detest liars like you and will always call out the utter garbage you say.

Rattled are we!

Blade

Not disputing what you’ve said, agree that dummy trade prices are usually always what the executed trade is priced at, but that can vary slightly between platforms. Plus it’s still not the point I’m trying to make.

“You are obviously usng the wrong platform, T212? Try a more reputable platform, you will need to factor in the trading fees which I appreciate may be difficult for you with you £50 trades.”

Not using the wrong platform either (IGG, H&L, mostly but do have T212 account as well), oh how I wish I could afford £50 trades!

So many cheap rampers like Sparky will always say things like buy trades are going through as sells, or mm’s are manipulating the price, it’s all rubbish.

Now he’s saying it’s BOTS, there’s absolutely no way he’d know that, from my experience it’s highly unlikely that BOTS would be trading an illiquid low volume stock like YU.

Little pip boy posts regularly that he’s topping up, another cheap ramp too, but he was caught out with his 125 trade that never happened and now doesn’t mention a volume, time, or price of his alleged top-ups. You see it all the time on bulletin boards, folks that just want to try and ramp their stocks and try to get others to follow suit - that’s Sparky all over, a liar.

Sparky Pal

You are so full of it.

You cannot prove buys are being posted as sells unless you physically execute a trade. Getting dummy offer / bid prices does not prove anything.

You are posting false and misleading information. You are a blatant liar.

Not missing the point, I know how buy and sells when executed are determined based on the mid price.

But the point I’m making is it doesn’t matter what the offer price is to buy on a dummy trade, to prove an executed trade has been posted incorrectly would need it to go through an order book then the note posted. There is no other way of proving if an actual trade has been posted incorrectly unless the trade doesn’t gone through at the time it was executed and the mid has moved so it gets posted up incorrectly.

If you look at the trades yesterday when Sparky said he’d done some test trades the bid / offer had been 1580-1600 (from memory) for quite some hours and the trades looked to be allocated correctly based on the trade prices and the mid price. No trades appeared to have been posted up incorrectly. And as I said, the only way to prove buys were posted as sells would be to physically execute a trade, you can’t assume that the dummy offer price would be above the mid price when the trade physically went through the books and posted up.

Blade

Sparky clearly stated he’d done test trades and his buy showed as a sell.

So you tell me how th heck he managed to do that without executing a trade and also why don’t you ask Sparky (because apparently I’m filtered - Not) which were his test trades that hat to be executed and posted up yesterday at the time he said, or even hours later.

Bet you won’t would be my guess, no prob if you don’t but others can hopefully see that he is a bare faced liar.

All the best

You can do dummy buys and sells to get prices but the only way you can test if a buy is posted as a sell is to actually execute the chuffing trade, you defo are missing something, something quite basic.

Have a good day chap