Member Info for Digittt

New HNW's...as opposed to the old, former HNW's that we are? Just stating for a laugh. Perhaps seasoned investors believe there will be sufficient buying opportunities on the way up and they're willing to give up some of the upside for a few more ticks in the right boxes on risk.

I use II and in the app around the voting there is an option to attend. II also set some letters on voting rights to be shown to the admin guys that does help and allow you to vote all your shares if they’re tied up in things like SIPPs and the like.

It’s a great event but is fancy dress…this years theme is come dressed as an antibody. See you there.

It’s not Vlad’s money. It’s just a little gap in the rules that allows him to get some additional money in from another investor. But hopefully it gets us through p3.

Dhub - you're trying the KingPing blaggy "I'm in the know" pose and it doesn't look good on you. He's FOS, may I suggest you don't go down that path.

Bobbyjack09...uhhh...no. It simply means they created the CAR-T, the patient survived the prep and they didn't miss the arm when they jabbed it with the needle.

Thinkin, and yet you're still here?

Mornington...uhh...no. We have not heard the company before say that in an actual human trial the early signs of efficacy of their potential cure for AML are encouraging. We are trying to cure cancer here...and it's wonderful news for the patient and us. Here's to hoping the efficacy data continues to be supportive in this patient and all future ones.

Solow, should our worst case assumption be that we are going to get your titbits of investing wisdom on an ongoing basis? Echo the comment on Saint by Jaytee.

I say it's a pure bet because the dice is rolling, nothing the company or anyone else does is going to influence the result and the result I believe dictates the future of the company. Do I think it's a >50% chance of success...yes...do I make statements that it's 100% certain the patient will come through with no adverse affects...no - I'm not a muppet.

It’s a straight forward pure bet. This will start to move when we get some news on the trial. Up or down, preferably for the patient and us, up.

Pensioninvestor, if you don’t mind I’ll ignore you and listen to Haywain who knows what he’s talking about and doesn’t make stupid statements like you.

I think that late RNS'es on funding might be more sensible. Some overnight pondering and sleep on the details of any funding seems more sensible than knee-jerk panicked trading from a quick read of an RNS on open.

No offence SocialistB, but I'll put plenty of credence on things Haywain says on AML Blasts, and zero on your opinion taken in the round.

Nah...Vlad wants the lab space to continue making his 8 foot tall mice that really are super..

Anyone here who pays for their data feed from LSE should ask their support the question.

Pingu...how do they go about deleting their posts? I think it's remarkable and genuinely could do with LSE telling us what the heck happened. ie if they weren't reported, do they just delete their account and their posts disappear?

Barbershop...I have a vague recollection on one of the chats with Vlad he said something like the fund in the end was more focussed on detection rather than cure and hence not relevant. Apologies, I can't remember exactly, but there was some differential I thought...or I'm blurring memories on another grant discussion. From my perspective we ought to give up dreaming of magic, free, grant money. Even MD money with their partners would come in as dilutive funding. Dilutive in ownership sure, but with the hope it comes with such a valuation increase that we are quids in.

JHFH....if you say his name 2 more times he come's back. Don't say it again.

Kingpin you are in full ramp mode (and I’m

not against it) but if they want us to get behind them let’s see them follow through on directors purchases. Does that mean all of us who have bought in the last week have more confidence than the directors?

Correct...I'm sure someone else has said this already, but you've got 400x less shares but they're worth 400x more...the value of your holdings won't change. The value of the company won't change. That's the theory, and I'm fine with it. But there must be a heckuva lot of misunderstanding for the share-price to tank like it has, or the real point is everyone is panicking at the suggested 50% dilution. They shouldn't be...I'd absolutely take the dilution at the right price.