Member Info for Digittt

Notposting...again you spin your yarns. So...you'll take the share price being where it is now being a dramatic improvement on where we were not so long ago. You'll take the funding position we're in which is a lot better than we were, not so long ago. You'll take Vlad not being pressured to make lousy financial decisions because of all of these improvements. But you'll attack JHFH and try and create some commercial personal only motives...you'll ignore the efforts he and Haywain made to get in new HNW investors which drove all of this . Yes it was a significant effort. And yes, we know what HNW's actually are...even UHNW's. Your attempts to be condescending mostly result in you looking like an idiot. Perhaps you deserve the pity you were desperate to garner with some of your prior posts.

Alde, credit where credit is due, your post made me chuckle. And I don’t disagree with much of the sentiment, despite being all in on HEMO

NCTrade - did you mean a FLT3+ epileptic fit? If so...I think we have a cure for that.

Alde... a little under an hour ago that you posted "Cya for now 👋" there were many of us here who I'd hazard were hoping that you meant a much longer time frame.

MrI, I'm happy with your thinking - saying you're excited that it could be as soon as next week, great. Saying your math suggests it's next week...all good. But saying it's likely wihout suggesting it's your view is my issue. Those are the sorts of statements that us LTH's get dinged for. We've also had plenty of trauma with HEMO over the years, and the one thing I've learnt is that timelines have always been too ambitious. But yes, agree, we're both in on the share. If the price drops much further I may even contemplate buying more.

MrI, you'd have to pull off some David Copperfield untold magic to get respect based on the long history. Making statements like the one I quoted causes folks to ignore you as it's daft. It's possible news come next week...that is fair. Saying it's likely is stupid.

Not trying to dampen spirits at all, still here for the same reasons as before...still hugely excited by the prospects and leveraged for it, just can't see how you see merit in making statements like that.

MrI...the criticisms you receive are not for your optimism, it's for the stupid statements like "This is likely to happen again starting next week." Yes I'd like Hemo to Go...but don't be daft with statements like that.

Alde…I was typing a response engaging on your bad omen and my phone glitched and lost it, and only didn’t get thrown across the room as my cup of coffee was there to save the day. In short though…from my side I’m not particularly interested in hearing timelines from Vlad as they’ve always been wildly ambitious. The bottleneck I’m concerned about is Made. Cohort approval will come through…processes take longer than we’d like but in this instance I attach annoyance rather than caution of a potential bad omen. Made I’d say the same…annoyance. We will get there but principally we need to keep adding to the patient data…and until we are manufacturing again to inject it doesn’t matter what approvals we have. Also remember the P3 story. We started getting nervous as it was taking so long….there were valid reasons…one annoying reason in there as well…but P3 was injected and the result was no trace of the bad cells (need another coffee to remember how it was phrased).

Notposting…you’re talking layers onion boy? Why not parfait, everyone likes parfait. You’re making your own grand leaps.

Notposting...you mean like your fake ADHD drivel? Get a life, stop your made up BS...really. That's not ADHD, it's an attention deficit only because you're looking for attention.

JHFH has plenty of backing, brought HNW investors into the company...the LTH's know him - there's no one you can influence with your tripe.

If you were going to cast a stone at people professing to be LT investors but who before sold down most if not all of their holdings, your aim is off.

Thanks Haywain.

Oh wait, think I misread your post...you were saying that. I've heard Vlad say twice on separate occasions (a few months apart) that the first time he expects efficacy data to be presented is at ASH. So suspect that's the first time it's available.

Moors...I'm open to correction, but I thought it would actually be MDA who would present at ASH. That being said, someone somewhere mentioned Vlad has presented there before, so perhaps I'm wrong.

Pumpky....you keep with your sniping, to no end. Muppet.

HFH…did you just say there is little to believe in your mind? Your words. Yes it’s good to be excited, yes I am a bull on the share…but come on, just describe that as an everything goes right scenario…not something you plausibly think is almost certain to play out.

Pumpky - putting words in JHFH's mouth, but since I've heard them effectively from him...they will hold. Their reason for the CLN was because they wanted in and the only way in was the CLN with no equity headroom until later.

Vander - I'll leave Haywain to answer on what might be needed. You'll have noticed he was thanked earlier...he's an expert in the field who volunteers information from a position of relevant knowledge and experience. This question was asked a while back (perhaps on another board, so apologies if it was) - my concerns were somewhat allayed, at the time, although I can't remember the detail of the answer. Would I instinctively expect some form of a requalification ...yes I would. But that's not known it's a guess...and the level of work or time required can be anything.

Thanks Haywain, useful to know.

Vander - you're mixing what was in the RNS with your own opinions. You also miss the part where

1. DSMB review and dose escalation; submit the combined data from the first three patients to the DSMB and, subject to its approval, advance into the next dose cohort."

This is over the same period...they are aiming to advance into the next dose cohort. They can only do that if Made is operational. So you are adding your opinion amongst fact, and blurring the lines a lot. Suggest you stick to the facts. I am also focussed on Made, I don't think you're wrong for thinking about it....but you are portraying information as fact when you have zero credentials in this space as far as I am aware.

Stevey to quote yourself from another board today:

"Report dodgy tactics to:

Financial Conduct Authority warning: Insider dealing, unlawful disclosure, market manipulation, and attempted manipulation are offences punishable by an unlimited fine and up to ten years in prison.

For more information visit the FCA website"

Where would you position your BS post on "death spiral" in your tactics book above? We all know about the CLN's...they were only CLNs (with no interest at an appropriate pricing at the time) as there was no headroom to issue equity until November.