Member Info for Digittt

Let-it-roll…uhh. No. Not at all.

Thanks Tilly...nice.

Tilly...can you post the Level2?

Ridiculous spread?

I can't tell Aldebaran, what side of the mouth are you talking out of...or does that change depending on what board you're posting on?

Aldebaran - it's the final internal board at MDA that has to give final approval for the trials to start. We went through this on the first cohort...with the extension to paediatrics they go through it again....but not expecting any surprises.

Would you rather he say he's "sorry they have their pants down"?

The warrants are known about and will always be hanging over us. I'd rather the warrant holders hold the shares, but these look to always have been in it to sell the shares on the prior issuance and then wait on the warrants to sell them when they saw decent profit. That they have done. They're not LTH'ers...so good riddance in some respects.

Subject says it all...not new dilution, but extra runway. Nice.

Bline...your maths sucks

I have a cunning plan sir....

BBB I said on a chat elsewhere that if it got to £2 and held there then I’d start to think something might be in play. That matches enough to your 15%, so yes.

Bline, I’m just as interested in good news coming as the next LTH and I’d happily be wrong…but some of the buying was me and at least one other I know who added. But that’s because I saw what was happening as it artificially got marched down and bet on a) the bounce back b) it truly being a daft entry price (BBBs risk reward suggestion about covers it). That was done on the same info from the company as you have…ie nothing else.

Bline….you’re right these movements don’t happen for nothing. But it’s simply the unwinding of the shenanigans with the block sells that took us down to 130 over the last week or so. We find ourself back where we were. You can tell yourself that this is some major leak, but you need more sense if you realistically believe that or the hype train that’s suddenly kicking in. Or perhaps you’re simply just one of the coaches on the train.

Yes we want good news. But we can’t pretend something isn’t as obvious as what’s played out.

So Stu...nothing has changed...no further information has been released. But suddenly your research suggests an "announcement sooner or later confirming, definitive early efficacy within those treated." You have been attacking Haywain consistently for his view that that is what has been strongly suggested by the early paediatric expansion approval by the FDA amongst other things. Haywain who has demonstrated consistently that he is as close as a scientist can be to being in this industry, in this sector, in this type of drug development program. He has explained clearly multiple times of why he has the view that HEMO's CAR-T could be successful.

That's compared to you, the fork tongued trader who has done his bit to drag down the share price and is now buying back in? You have bent yourself in knots trying to pretend you're sincere and to shift focus away from educated views. I'm sure you'll try again now...that is your nature.

The difference between the rampers and you is that you are collectively trying to manipulate views to achieve your trading goals and don't give a jot about the cost to anyone else or the actual outcome for HEMO. You can't even pretend to care about the patients.

The rampers believe the science, have believed the science for a while...have been naive on the finances and timescales...but collectively they are willing HEMO to do well for the benefit of everyone, including patients. You can pretend to dress up cynicism as a counter-voice amongst the rampers but you have zero credibility - your motives are clear to anyone who looks at this page for more than a minute. You're betting people have shorter attention spans and you can get away with it, but that's been figured out and why many of the rampers will push you down the page again and again

Don't disagree - more money is needed, just don't know when it is needed. The timeline for when cash hits the company bank accounts following a raise though was longer than I had imagined. Can't recall exactly which raise was but it took something like a month or so for the cash to hit the company accounts. It left me with two thoughts - it was good in that it meant the company had more runway than expected (as they hadn't spent that money as it hadn't arrived yet)...but it also highlighted that there is a decent time-lag to getting access to funds raised. Perhaps it was that particular raise that was slow, I don't know...but if not, then when you are raising "month to month" you presumably need something like another month of cash buffer.

Micky...I think there was a period that we were nearing the end of on the paediatric stuff...ie with the FDA. Then it has to go back to the same committee at MD that we went through before. Vlad suggested that it's still going to be a bit of time before we get to paediatric patients...my guess was 2-3 months.

Ribbit...I was there and have a different memory of the grant discussions. I understood Vlad was saying to forget grants for now...they take too long...and Trump had wrecked any chance of the one grant they were chasing with the FDA. But happy to be told I remember wrong.

Haywain would suggest the mice testing indicated that it has efficacy…I think…he’s confident and is about the most expertised person we know. Efficacy commentary I suspect is all Vlad will say for a while (but what he says is good).

Micky drag your head a little bit out of your a$$ when you try type. There's also a reason why your wine tastes the way it does. I voted as I was there. Your app from your broker should also allow you to vote...if I didn't attend, I would have voted through that.

The RNS indicates less than 20% of the shares were voted...unless I misread. He got 75% or so support but that was only 600k votes. There is no moaning, he was supported by those who voted. If you didn't vote and didn't want to support, it's your own fault. I supported, and yes I was there.