Member Info for Digittt

Oooh, that's one mention for me from Boom. Just a short month of posts from you with my name it and I'll catch up to Haywain in no time.

Full disclosure Boom...I laughed at Tropic Thunder.

Alde - in terms of common ground, I expected nought from DCNY as well. I know it was DavieB who asked it, but you leapt on it and Simpson's style "I want answers".

And I think the language that was used on P1 and P2 was they were discharged. Yes you can be discharged post op the minute they can get you into a wheelchair and you've used the ablutions....but it certainly didn't come across in that way, and this is a trial where all data is relevant and it's unlikely in my head they would send a patient home like that unless they were comfortable they were OK.

Boom...you continually try your Haywain attack vector (is that for over a month now? an inordinate number of your posts include his name?). It's not going to work, he's a decent chap, a scientist and he's put his money where his mouth is and has answered questions pretty darn well. Or are you Michael Gove and have already said you are sick and tired of taking advice from academics and scientists (can't remember the quote but it was something like that).

Alde - you do put some intelligence and thought in, as do many of us. Perhaps it would help us if you classified us a little better...not sure if it's worth separating the super-ramp gang vs just the ramp gang. You at least made reference to knowing that some of us have Vlad's ear and attention at times. But then you spin out raising the question are P1 and P2 alive as if it's a real drop the mic question. It would have to be reported and quickly as suggested if they were not. We have said a number of times...MDA controls the data. Vlad doesn't ask P1 or P2 to turn their head to the left and cough. You can ask him your questions on quality of life etc and it would be interesting to see if he asks MDA. I suspect he won't and his answer will be - the patients are at home (not needing care - but that is the implication...filling that part in myself based on how messages were conveyed).

NotPosting...your limited posts say you're new to this....really you are....we believe you. From my side CheckRicky was filtered long ago...made the mistake of un-filtering a week ago, but he's gone back, suspect your experience will be better without him.

Tilly…I looked them up the other day. One time director of Hamilton Stuart is Barbara Kahan (who would have been in her 80s I think when appointed as director for one day). If you google her and learn about the binary options fraud stuff (she was named as a director of >20,000 companies) it tells you a lot about the Stuart behind Hamilton Stuart. Funny…TW doesn’t write articles about those frauds.

Boom, avoiding a Vengaboys reference....cry me a balanced river. Stop acting like you are being sage, balanced and wizened. Yesterday we had no idea that the company was pursuing something that could help expand patient numbers and generate revenue. We do know now. It is a very interesting approach being taken and yes, LOI are only LOI's...but the company has already referenced this as the first and seems clear to many that they wouldn't have RNS'ed this if they weren't pursuing properly. You can try paint yourself as being cautious and it not being a real opportunity but JHFH has called you out on that pretense.

I'm almost certain Stu said he was not posting for a while... desperate to try and turn a decent RNS into a nothing-burger as JHFH suggests. Does the RNS show intent of the company...it does...in a letter even. Is it good and new news with multiple positive angles (more patient data, revenue stream) yes it is. Is the agreement signed, no....but it's a sign of what Vlad can and is trying to do. Is it the result of DCNY...no - I'm on the fence of anything coming out of that personally, but would be another nice surprise. Oh yes, and hoping to hear about IRB on paediatrics and confirmation that cohort 1 is done and we are at higher dosing. Why don't you continue not posting NotPosting.

Stu - keep trying.

Stu, I mean NotPosting...still clamouring for the negative I see. Yes SP is not reacting much, but this is commercialization and definitely revenue...this is additional data on patients and this is larger than you're trying to pretend it's not. Many shareholders (who aren't actively trading) are here in the belief with Vlad that the treatment works. This accelerates the demonstration of that. Argue all you want about it being an LOI not a binding contract...get over yourself. The discussions are happening and real and we should hear about progress.

Agreed...Tilly how are the ships floating on L2?

Alde...can you wear a longer skirt, you're showing too much of yourself. This is not only for patients of Estonian origin...you know that, but keep playing your slant.

Alde..let’s make it clear. You kept half your pot meaning you traded out a chunk…that’s fine. But you guessed there was more upside potentially coming, and hence you held. You had zero idea of early revenue and exemptions from a nation state.

Vlad was extremely nervous prior to patient 1…sleepless nights, high stress…because the patient’s life was in his hands and there was the chance of it harming rather than helping someone in desperate need. I’d say his perspective has been updated based on what he’s seen. This is him going it works, he’s defo helping and let’s treat as soon as possible (while earning some money which doesn’t hurt).

No one I expects the Estonian Inquisition!

Go Vlad. Not something pursued when you are uncertain of your product.

Tim - how are your shorts doing? That's the same Tim who's prior HEMO posts are on "this raise is to keep the lights on"...What's wrong, are you sad that the science looks to be working? MDA are independent and so is the FDA and they are supporting expansion of the trials to paediatrics. And yet you try your pump and dump angle.

Mattrs - suspect Vlad has said what he can say on efficacy for now. MDA control the data and will present it if they are speaking on it at ASH (one of the academic conferences later this year...we hope they're speaking on it there, but don't think we know yet). That being said...Haywain has countless times chimed in on why the patients being alive this long + the paediatric expansion implies something significant on efficacy. Suspect that's what you will have to anchor off for now.

Saint....yes his flip flop was like a fish looking for water. But, if you can't tell, he likes the sound of his own voice - no need to repost it.

Alde - they're alive, your tone though is reminiscent of Stu. I applaud you though for dunking on that daft biscuit.

Dunk Biscuit bog off again with your BS rampiness. Celtic bog off with your stupidity and derampiness. Company funded until sometime next year.

Holy Ramper moley....can you guys just cut the cr@p.

F1 for the ramp. Just cut out the crap. We are in a decent position...we will have days of things going up and down...but momentum is in the right direction. If you believe in what the company is doing, you should be rewarded if you are prepared to wait a few months.