RE: Debates20 Dec 2022 14:34
Ragsrob; it might just be me but I’d like to see them give clear, easy to understand details in the RNS and for the BOD to keep the same wording, not change it every time they mention it. We’ve supposedly got the best of the best working for us yet they can’t do simple clear communication, things like that don’t sit right with me. What’s your thoughts on it?
29 June 2022;
1. MT Definitive Feasibility study on schedule for submission in 2022.
2. The Company continues to progress discussions with regard to the potential sale of its assets, appointing KPMG Russia as agent in May 2022, and has set aside sufficient funds to complete and submit a Definitive Feasibility Study for the Monchetundra project in November 2022.
3. The Group has spent £682,419 on a development programme for the Monchetundra asset during 2021 and has budgeted a further £527,000 for statutory reporting on this asset to November 2022, keeping the asset in good standing while strategic options for the project's development are considered.
30 Sept 2022
1. At Monchetundra the ongoing DFS study for the Loipishnune and West Nittis open pits represents an important reporting milestone for the project's development and is on schedule for submission before the end of 2022.
2. The Definitive Feasibility Study for the Monchetundra (West Nittis and Loipishnune) open pits is well advanced and on schedule for completion this year. Details of this report will be provided when a response is received from the relevant authorities. The Company has previously released a report commissioned by Wardell Armstrong International covering the adjacent NKT deposit, a deposit which the Company has title to through its Monchetundra Flanks license. Reporting on other Kola deposits, including Nyud and Moroshkovoe will be provided when Eurasia holds title to the relevant licenses. Operational highlights include:
3. Monchetundra Definitive Feasibility Study being progressed for completion by the end of 2022