Member Info for Daytradenovice

Nice swerve and a 6 out of 10 effort there spk, but you are always saying the 'trolls' are 7ninvested, several times today alone,, and as you consistently call me a 'troll' then the unnvested comment clearly applies to me, doesnt it. No deflecting from me.

Interesting news there level - they must be increasing their sales then if increasing their freight quantities. Great news for BooWho?

Let me know which word you specifically struggled to read Buffalo, i kept them all quite small on purpose so you could understand each one.

Was it 'deflect' or 'mo' or anything harder?

Bfd

Im not interested one bit how individual corporate deals are structured and you would have no odea of the specifics in that particular case either as you were not a party to it. No rns would detail all the specifics either before you try using that excuse to back your statement..

It makes no difference in reality how the Kumanis 'did the deal' too much money was paid for Plt by BOO. Father to son (and others), The amount paid is a seriously large % of the whole current mcap - are you seriously trying to say the 'price was right', when its blindingly clear it wasnt?

"The 'clown' knows you have a 41p investment it's been discussed in the past. If you're going to bend the truth or lie, keep up with your own posts."

Then why on earth o great one do you keep repeating the uninvested nonsense?

if youre going to bend the truth or lie keep up with your own posts eh.

Try to Deflect as much as you like old boy, your MO, as well as your postion, is transparent to all.

Perhaps better your not allowed to sail the words trouble spots with gear anymore.

Bfd, i take your initial point, however it is clear from the comments hurled back from the few individuals concerned that they are in fact underwater. Why would they be so agressive otherwise, to a perfectly polite and reasoned question?

There would in fact be no need at all and is quite clearly an overly emotional response to being questioned. The poster asked the polite question making such an obvious attempt to swerve rather than back his erroneous point up with facts.

I too would appreciate a 'share chat', im invested after all (despite the clowns protestations t9 the contrary), but as i view the company in a more negative stance that the out of control rampers any points made - even just a posted article for info, are shot down by the same pack of rampers with venom. Such is the way with those unable to control their emotions, sad but true im afraid.

One such loon even repeating words like "smash face in", such childish silly immature behaviour that im sure he couldnt back up either.

So thats a telling No then eh Spk.

You make silly statements that you just cannot justify and have no factual evidence to base them on, other than a straw pole of the same clique of also underwater abusive rampers.

Thought as much, but nice to have it confirmed.

Cant even manage to respond in a polite manner to a polite question.

Must be down an absolute pile like your chums

#roastedramper

A polite question for you spk.

How on earth do you know who is invested here for certain?

You have no way of knowing anybodys position, other than your own.

To suggest you are some sort of 'all seeing eye' is plain stupid.

So, how on earth can STATE people are UNINVESTED and yet have nothing at all to back those accusations up.

When answering perhaps consider the following firstly.

You can be invested, and mainly negative, it is permitted and perfectly reasonable.

People here have invested at far higher sp's than currently, are they all wildly positive?

Those 'in' at say £2, I would wager are not best pleased and feel hard done by, which are by default negative traits. Are they not permitted to be negative?

And i thank you immensly for letting me hold the title for a far shorter time than you. And yes you and your silly posts have already taken it back from the Putin fan. Hardly surprising.

Cant say i disgree with that viewpoint Voltaire one little bit.

What amazes me if people on here still sing those individuals praises after getting rinsed.

Wind you neck in Who.

Aernt you the poster that said he'd be "happy if putin invaded the whole of europe lol" if it helped the sp here?

Is that what you mean by "meaningful"?

Lovely fella.

Yeah i know Kachra, just thought it was an interesting article to show what that new interest was thats all.

Your turn now to play the fool then Who.

tut tut

I wouldnt disgree, of course the biggest money spinner was flogging his outfit to Boo, via his dad, for a silly overpriced figure, thanks dad. then there was that bit of nice sandy real estate.

Said it before, not daft that bloke, knows how to take peoples cash for sure

Wish him all the luck in the world.

I'll put my application in afteryou then Who, eh.

See old Umar branching out with a new venture, must be a bit tired of the cheap fashion game and fancies a change. All about the image with that one.

https://www.gg2.net/naomi-campbell-and-umar-kamani-to-launch-talent-management-firm/

Well,a little tickle up so far, see if that continues back to the break even

Dont forget all those 'revenue positive' returns adding to the appeal as well.

Wonder how much of a difference those will "manipulate" us by today?

You have absolutely no idea on what i hold, although i did confirm a few holdings and averages to you a while back after your last inaccurate baseless attack.

You should take more care of your own investments, fancy buying the turkey BOO lol

Dear oh dear mr Dung stalker, i have bought Glen over a far far longer period than your supposed trades. Right back to the 2015's, traded a few, held and built up a lot, and all the while received continous capital returns, which as well as purchasing lots very much lower than those prices you allege, all of which under taxation rules comes off the base purchase price resulting in a lowering each time a capital return is made.

Now, its not my fault a simpleton like you doesnt understand the taxation treatment of capital returns. Ive explained it to you plenty of times before, clearly you are too daft to understand.

So to make it easier for you, lets just suppose i bought a s8ngle share for £5 in 2017, for arguments sake. That share has received nice fat dividends twice a year for that period until the current date. Lets say 40p/year for 7 years. This would total up to a capital return of 7x40p= 280p.

What do you think the base cost price of that share is now for taxation purposes?

You'll probably say £5 because your dumb, but the answer is, and check with HMRC if you wish, £2.20.

It is very very easy to lower the base purchase cost of a share when recieving capital returns. In fact HMRC insist upon it!

Do you need any further lessons on this subject?

You did after all pay £3.78 for some BOO shares worth 36p, so demonstrating your lack of understanding.