Member Info for Daytradenovice

I was just going to post something along those exact lines Spidey, hardly got many investors champing at the bit to buy this pile of *****, only have to look at that sp for a dose of reality.

See Ldld'post got a few tickups too lol, calling out our very own bathing beauty for his garbage.

Https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/boohoo-best-near-penny-stock-061010212.html

All paid for with a gold plated civil servant pension. . . . . of course. yawn

Evening Pedro, hope you keeping well?

Best just report each of his posts untill lse enforce their permament ban, they are normally pretty good with that sort of thing from what ive learned on here.

The more decent folk that report him the sooner his ban will be upheld with his new Id

Transparent as glass isnt he. We all knew he couldnt keep away - just have to keep reporting him i suppose, maybe Smalley should too after the abuse he also had last time.

tut tu tradey. Go and play golf or something.

Tradey Attacking the same people again over there too it seems Spidey.

Quite the little bully eh

Not seen tradeys letter to Fashion Utd as yet?

the firm he falsely accused of telling 'half truths' within their article.

Beings as he 'knows how to write letters" and all, he told us ll that last time when writing to IR.

Anyone being 'balls deep' and underwater by so much here needs all the 'holidays' they can muster to counter the sinking feeling.

Think we should have R Kelly automatically playing in the background when clicking on the Boo tab. . . . . .

Not shaping up to well today so far, at this rate Michael Murray will be forced to find some more change lost in his sofa for another 'saviour' buy.

Ostrich mentality confirmed on here Crawshaw :)

Do you think im daft enough to play such nonsense deflecting games with you two clowns, your clearly experts at it so why would i bother wasting my time?

Have another read. Looking forward to the letter with the 'untruths and ommisions' bfd - dont forget eh!

https://fashionunited.com/news/business/timeline-behind-boohoo-s-boulevard-of-broken-promises/2024022358566

Have a good weekend boys, sunny here in Cornwall.

Oh i will, pleased to recieve your approval, not required of course, but nice non the less.

Let us know when you have pointed out to Fashion Utd all their 'half truths' in your email/letter - perhaps just pop a copy of your missive on here for us to read afterwards, im sure they dont bother reading forums like this, so not point regurgitating your same rebutals on here, is there.

Send them direct to the horses mouth as it were - after all you are accusing them of telling 'half truths' and then not providing a means to respond, so would be rather silly and hypocritical to do to them exactly what you claim they do to BOO.

Let us know and pop a copy up on here, a few others may then just take your lead and challenge the 'half truths and omissions' that you allege they propogate.

I of course, cannot possibly comment on fashion Utds thoughts behind their article, strange you should ask me their reasonings. Im sure you could ask them in your corrspondance directly, not for me to justify really is it.

Dont forget the posted copy, thank you in advance.

Sorry spk, prior to this post (im one up now as i had to comment on yours) you have posted as many times as i have today.

May i politely suggest you follow your own advice?

"So sad that the trolls feel they need to be here day by length, even double posting the same article. The markets closed get a life"

"Both you and daytrade posted the link to the article, so it was in fact posted twice as SPK said."

Its three times now bfd, but no real issue as can appreciate posts crossing. I may however add the post to each of mine for a few days, just to ensure that interested folk get the chance to see it, as i consider it, as others do, to paint a full picture of the history here all in a single place. I would say concise but with that long list. . . . well you know..

Wouldnt want anybody to not get the chance to form their own view.

"This article is a classic example, some actual real issues highlighted but totally padded out with a load of half truths and omissions."

So i suppose you do the right and proper thing and will spend a bit of time this afternoon kindly drafting out a letter/email to Fashion Utd pointing out the 'half truths', you allege they have stated, and asking for them to rewrite the article to only provide 'full truths' instead? Im sure you will agree this would be a good use of time and serve a commendable social outcome in the pursuit of 'full truths". Im sure such contact would be more than welcomed by fashion Utd, and upon examination they would indeed remove any 'half truths' inadvertanly published.

"Interestingly enough there is no right of reply quoted which any half decent journalist would do."

Oh im sure it wont be too hard to find out the contact details necasary if one felt strongly about correcting the record. Google may help you with that.

"Maybe not enough shares are being freed up for Frasers and this sort of journalism is supposed to help!"

Not suggesting that fashion utd are one of the "manipulators" of this stock im assuming here, that would be rather presumptuous i feel, so, would such an article really, in the real world of course, enable Micheal murray to 'top up' his holding from all those sellers now rushing to dump stock. Somehow i doubt that very much, but would be happy to see evidence to the contrary

Reardon, would love to, but if im attacked merely for posting an article. . . . well.

Maybe you should say the same to those individuals?

Why do you want to deny this article exisits and keep it quiet rampers?

https://fashionunited.com/news/business/timeline-behind-boohoo-s-boulevard-of-broken-promises/2024022358566

Just seems the 'hear no evil speak no evil see no evil' three wise monkeys only want to see articles backing up their confirmation bias.

What a great way for an 'investor' to be.

So stuck in their destryoed viewpoints with this blundering dinosaur that all those multiple points, and there are MANY, are cast adrift as wrong. Really! How blinkered can somebody be.

This share has quite clearly been a walking disaster zone for some time, a languishing sp that has gone NOWHERE in 16 months, is loss making, has zero good pr, closes a 'model factory', break point of origin rules and lies about it, gets rid of its own execs, etc etc etc and plenty more listed in the article the rampers are trying to cover up with their usual MO of attacking the posters of the information with hostility, rather than challenging the article itself.

The level of denial they show is just unreal.

Likely as not they'd deny night follows day if it suited the nonsense they pedal, which lets be clear is all done to try and mitigate their own losses, by suckering yet more people into buying these. It wont change a thing though in reality.

Only genuine positive news - of which there isnt any - will do that, and boy will it need to be stunning to counter all the continual negative stories around this blunder8ng dinosaur of a non-growth company.

All down to the clear and undeniable fact that they picked a pup, and are so emotionally affected by it they lash out in all directions. Criticising people have posted on a weekend - and then doing it thenselves in response lol. You really couldnt make it up.

That Directors "Growth plan" is working brilliantly lads, SP's off on its way to the £6.50 moon by next tuesday.

I think its clear its not, and i think its clear the roasted rampers dont actually have a single clue between them.

No problem Kachra, it doesnt make for good reading seeing all those points in one big long long list, and the daft fo pahs the company has continually dropped, such as blabbing about 'a model factory' then using it to change destination of origin labels to intentionally mislead people.

Shocking behaviour, they claim was an 'accident'. Yeah and im the pope!

Agree totally on the ESG point, particularly for serial offenders like Boowho. And some folk on here say Shien is upto no good. Glasshouses and all that.

Maybe you teo other fanboys will be making representations to Fashion Utd calling them out for the 'untruths' in their article then?

Thought not.

Because there are none are there. Its just a huge long long list of the companies indiscretions and poor pr, and given the amount of them in such a continual stream , its no surprise the sp is right down here.

Micheal Murray is most certainly 'bottom fishing' in every sense of the words

Thought exactly then same Bon, such a big long list you almost need a coffee break in the middle. Obviously its all just "clickbait" etc etc, but as you say mud sticks, and boy has this business had enough of that chucked at it, going from that very very long list.

Hardly a wonder its where it is at all really. No doubt the boards 'marketing expert' will pop up soon chanting 'no such thing as bad press'.