RE: What is a 'win-win' agreement?23 Jul 2021 22:33
I agree that the government may not appreciate the risks and costs associated with mining, and based on that, they may be pushing for too bigger a slice. I also feel that, at some point RBW need to walk away and focus on S.A. They should set a dead line for a deal to be agreed or not, and go to plan B if no deal.
What I didnt know, until the read the latest news (which is old news really) was this:
Others companies whose operations have been suspended are involved in mining gold and coltan, which is used mainly in electronic devices.
So if other mines are also suspended, then we may be a bargaining chip, used by the government, and our fete may be less in our own hands than I first thought. The government must be losing quite a bit if various mines are stopped. They must have one mean poker face to lose 3 months worth of tax and see the 10% stake in the mine they have lose value. Almost sounds a bit unhinged and not someone you could trust to keep a deal.
To the point about using the income from Gakara to fund or even part fund Phal. I had initially hoped this would be the case, but even if exports starts soon, I bet we see a placing or deal done. One reason I wont buy any more here.
Finances aside, the indecision on Gakara appears to be crippling progress in Phalabora.
I think getting Phal online represents the best return for investors here, even if the mine life is short. 15 years is long enough to be on to some other opportunity, or sell the business. I bet the Brundii government will still be spiting their face over Gakara. They sound like a tough bunch to deal with IMO.
I note in all this time, no real explanation or acknowledgement from George. Another reason I wont buy more and disappointing.