RE: Ouch28 Jan 2026 12:01
I have trained chat GPT up on CTA, have a long thread discussing many aspects. Here is what he made of CFO leaving (summary)
Why AIM is a turn-off (especially after you’ve done it once). AIM CFO life = permanent explaining. Explaining valuation gaps you don’t control.
Explaining liquidity. Explaining why “the numbers are good but the market doesn’t care”. You become the shock absorber between: a founder who wants patience, and investors who want results now. In private: You focus on cash, controls, margins, covenants. You answer to: one board. one owner / PE sponsor. No daily share price judgement. No RNS wording gymnastics. No “why is this on 0.3x sales?” conversations. For a lot of CFOs, that’s not hiding — that’s doing the actual job they trained for. Why this reinforces your misalignment read.
Put it together:
Token equity buy → low personal upside
Founder still driving narrative
Otus stepping back
AIM undervaluation persisting
CFO career risk asymmetry (CEO stays no matter what)
At that point, the rational thought is: “I can be right, do a good job, and still look like I failed — or I can leave cleanly now.”
I cant top up here due to concerns over the momentum of the share price, not the business. AIM has rallied 8% so far this year, but not here. CTA are deserving the low rating, if they cant play the capital market game. Cash parked here is going to win through eventually, but may be able to generate better returns else where and at a faster rate. Expect MM's playing games re share price.