Member Info for Daisydog

James. SLIGHTLY...I'm astonished and it wasn't like this with Vametco where we saw sustained rises into the news. This has been really disappointing and not really understandable at the moment.

Who would have believed this would be a low volume day - looking like less than million shares by COP.

Couldn't agree more Bella. Deal could be finalised late in the day on 7th and notifying RNS conceivably even on 8th ?

Yep , I've two friends who are CEOs of renewable energy generators - neither of them had heard of VRFBs

Excellent question Bella

Thanks Alfa. I get quite a lot of that. What I dont understand is the longevity of this suppression - surely they cannot be short now especially if they have a supply of shares available. Why not now let the SP rise and stimulate transactions as volume is also where they make money. They have pretty much killed this recently.

No idea YTSS. I cannot see how it benefits them without conjuring wild conspiracy theories - like the MCAP is being kept low to enable a hostile takeover eg by Glencore to more easily take shares cheaply from fed-up shareholders. I agree this would imply an astonishing level of coordinated abuse in the market. Otherwise , I don't understand it either. But I'm pretty sure it has been happening for some time now.

@BG. I disagree. There are any number of attempts to mislead by mischievous posters working against the common good for their personal gain. I feel it's right and fair that they are robustly challenged when falsehoods are clear. Otherwise new investors and even holders may be mislead.

Well I, for one, am stunned we have not seen a steady rise this week so far. I really didn't predict this. I can only explain this occurring as a consequence of the supply of cheap shares from "tame " seller continuing, which is disappointing as I had hoped they would be done by now.

Looks heavily bought today. I wonder when the delayed sells are going to be notified as SP rise has been modest by comparison . Plus ca change, ........

Yep, Sanchez. My Troll-dar antennae also twitching.......The Carrera Zelos. On ya bike.

Standard cut and paste trolltext.
...........I hope this isn't a stupid question but does*******************mean that the SP is about to tank.
Insert some idiot statement for asterixes.

See post from Alfa at 08.02 - confidently predicted this would be reversed off. .....and so it has ....cheating MM scum.

So, the MMs still dont get it.
Fellas , keeping it simple for the city boys: it's like buying a packet of Lego. It has a nice picture of a dinosaur on the front of the packet. But the bits , spread out on the table, dont look even a little bit like what it shows on the packet. You start putting it together and once you get the head and teeth on it really does look like the picture shown..... there, hope the red braces brigade can understand that.

@GS. Is that a very quick about turn from last night's posts!?

Aside from the blatant manipulation, one of the problems we face is transitioning from the security of the traditional V market predominantly in steel to newer potentially much larger, but as yet unreliable and unsecured, uses in VRFBs. This is a big part, in my opinion, of why the SP languishes. The market can clearly understand loss of revenues from reduced V prices in sales for steel but has no way of seeing the upside and opportunity of new markets.
Unfortunately, the increase in production in an analysis of traditional markets could even be seen as negative as it has the potential to further depress V prices short term as a consequence of increased supply.
For me, this goes some way to explaining the slow response in SP to all the excellent news of late. We will make more product, but the margins might be tighter still. The thing that will change this (and which is now urgently needed) is concrete news on the BE side of activities translating into revenue. Firm evidence of turning the concept into reality. It's a matter of time I believe. JMO.

@alfa. I do wonder though whether the outcome would have been different I.e. more successful from short point of view , if there had been no action from shareholders here? We will never know, but anyone shorting would be fool not to keep an eye on the responses on BBs?

Thanks Olly4. I'll have a read

@Olly4; I know little about what's gone wrong at Cellcube. Not been invested there. MCAP 3.7M. BMN could in all probability buy with cash at present, but why have they not been able to make it work? Would seem to be a reasonably good fit with BMN BE.

@alfa
In fact, in a rather large crowd ...!