Member Info for CrustyPete

And what is that meant to be "evidence" of - My talking my own book? My changing with the wind? Suiting my own trading agenda?

How is that evidence of my talking my own book when I have many more shares than you have? How is that changing with the wind when I have been making similar comments consistently since the AGM? How is that suiting my own trading agenda when I have not traded Aminex since 2009?

It is evidence that you have totally lost the plot Drewky and have a vivid imagination, nothing more...

Fantasy Drewky, fantasy and libellous fantasy at that.

Anyway I have far more pleasant and useful things to be doing with my evening than arguing the toss with a paranoiac fantasist. So for now goodnight all....

Idiot is hardly a term that compares to "cheat" and "liar", which is what your accusations would make me if they were true. THAT is why I will not cede to you Drewky...

The fact that you can make such accusations without proof or even substantive evidence just goes to prove what a fool you are and should make everyone reading question your judgement.

It is easy to make such allegations from the safety of your own key pad - when you come to the AGM make sure you have your evidence....

And until and unless we do get that "production license" -(PSA or Development) they may very well not do....

Well that is your one-eyed interpretation of it Drewky - confirmation bias all over again.....

"instead of trying to defect it would've been far better to put your hands up, man up and accept a mistake" I did Drewky regarding the $500k. I still stand by my assertion that by suggesting the TPDC's claim was for $5.93 m is neither inappropriate nor incorrect and certainly not deliberately misleading; If that is your reading of it is only because that is the way you choose to do so...

Moreover that totally overlooks yours and CP's unfounded and deliberately malicious accusation that all of this was in an attempt to manipulate a lower entry point. Total fabrication, unfounded and, as you have written it down, libellous. Show me your reference for that Drewky?

Come to the EGM and make that accusation to my face.

The figures you refer to on p37 of the recent circular do not come close to supporting your resources figures unless you want to use P10 figures!! If so you have underestimated it should be circa 5.2 TCF. However as you well know (but have conveniently forgotten) the usual quoted measure is P50 and that figure is 2.2 TCF - Oh bugger me what a surprise!! As for the 2017 figures I would not contest them but simply state that they are totally out of date as is evident to all; would it not have been more sensible to use figures from this year? After all we have had a license lapse since then and these figures manifestly related to a point before the Lindi License lapsed. Are you telling me that you had forgotten about that? How convenient... selective memory then Drewky? Or only looking for the evidence that backs up your version of reality?

So how is it that when you misquote figures it is a simple mistake but when I do so it has malicious intent Drewky explain that please? Perhaps if I used statistics from 2017 there would not have been a spurious TPDC Claim for $5.93 m to argue over and we would have been getting paid for the last 12 months.

But to your first paragraph - firstly and most poignantly I not once claimed that Aminex actually OWED any sums whatsoever to the TPDC. I simply stated that the TPDC were claiming it and , as we have each agreed during subsequent conversation and as I have stated many times previously, I do not think we will ever end up paying it... So NO Drewky I did NOT say that we owed anything! Simply that the TPDC were claiming it. I think that would be obvious to any one without an axe to grind.

"That said, since Q1 when the TPDC clobbered us with the $5.93 million "claim" we haven't had any money to do anything"

You could assert that by using the term "us" I implied that this was against Aminex (I certainly did not specifically say so) but again to anyone without a malicious agenda to peddle this could easily have been taken to mean the JV partners. But as if self evident to anyone you will use anything to attempt to undermine anyone or anything that doesn't sing from the Drewky hymn sheet....

Oh dear oh dear, here we go again - $5.93 was actually the figure I quoted as the TPDC "claim" Drewky not $5.94. And this figure is totally correct - as is the fact that only $2.73 of this figure is attributable to AEX. I did not point this out because it was NOT relevant to the original conversation taking place at the time, which was that because of the claim (irrespective of the amount) AEX were NOT being paid their invoices by the TPDC. ALL of which is true....But you simply latched on to the $5.93 vs $2.73 and again accused me of "exaggerating the figures" well, firstly there is NO exaggeration, $5.93 m is the outstanding claim for the JV partners from the TPDC fact! Was it necessary, or even relevant to point out that only $2.73 related to AEX? No is the answer but you could not see that could you Drewky

Please tell me that the TPDC claim against the Kiliwani partners is NOT for $5.93 million....

The figure that I got wrong was the figure for the cost of Compression ($500k versus $250,000) for which I happily held up my hands and apologised at the time.

Which is something that I am sure you are now going to do for the false assertion that the TCF for Ruvuma is 5TCF? :0))

YOU did CP but Drewky still maintains that he has been right all along!! (Idiot)

And yet still that I am the one trying to deceive "readers".... Evidently still doesn't see the hypocrisy in this.

But then I suppose we ought to make allowances for the afflicted.

Yes actually I do know what I am talking about Drewky - it is just a pity that YOU don't...

October 2018 Corporate Presentation (created after the "loss" of the Lindi license).

Page 3.

Summary

- 7.0 TCF** across the portfolio (PMean GIIP)

Page 6.

Nyuni PSA.

- 4.8 TCF (gross unrisked Mean GIIP)

Net result Drewky? Ruvuma net 2.2 TCF.....

Now I know that to work this out Drewky would require some grasp of rudimentary maths, which might be beyond you, but that means that your figure of 5TCF from earlier today is more than double the current figure, post Lindi License .

As you say Drewky " ...like all stock bashers they rely on their knowledge credibility to bullshit & baffle brains knowing full well most people will not bother to check what they say is factual."

It seems that it isn't only "stock bashers" and includes the rampers like you too Drewky.

As Shakespeare would probably say at this point Drewky has been "hoist with his own petard"....

And yes Tanzania you are quite right but I cannot abide these censorious hypocrites.

" Didn't stop him deflecting the issue three times implying it didn't matter when he more than doubled the amount in question." And nor did you admit that the figure itself was not the point of the argument... but then you probably did not see that.

"He knows full well where all the information can be found and just like all stock bashers they rely on their knowledge credibility to bullshit & baffle brains knowing full well most people will not bother to check what they say is factual."

"He knows full well where all the information can be found " Okay then Drewky show me....

So just for clarity Drewky (and CP) are you (both) still claiming that the TCF for Ruvuma is 5TCF? Because if you are wrong you are going to look bloody stupid after spouting off as you have just done. :0)

Oh really and what would you call yours and Drewky's self serving, unsubstantiated, unfounded and knowingly malicious accusations of my "trying to manipulate a lower entry point"? Rather than rebutt any counter opinion or argument that doesn't reflect your own you just try to undermine it by suggesting that it is only being offered as a "trading strategy".

You both accused me of deliberately exaggerating figures to undermine the share price the other day but then, lo and behold, coincidentally both quote the same overblown figure for Ruvuma TCF this morning... but of course when you do it, it is only a mistake.

My first mail of the morning was totally innocuous CP. Drewky started repeating his accusations.... and then starts bleating about it.

It's easy to sit behind the computer making accusations isn't CP? And rather pathetic to then whinge and whine about Crusty being "nasty" when he responds in kind. Oh diddums..

I can hear the violins playing in the background. :0)

Yes BG, possibly... Or maybe "squeal" ;0)

Enough said Drewky.

BUT you still haven't answered my question; So where does the 5TCF for Ruvuma come from? Please substantiate the figure.

Perhaps you ought to remember it CP the next time you accuse me of "exaggerating" figures in the pursuance of some nefarious, self serving scheme...

Otherwise it would be yet another shameless demonstration of crass hypocrisy wouldn't it CP?

I suggest you search again CP.

So, it is possible to make a mistake on "remembered " figures without having some "hidden" agenda then CP....?

Nasty Drewky?

I posted one post and you respond with....

"Balance my arse, are you sure you don't mean balance when the trading wind changes?

I think you ought to look in the mirror Drewky. As soon as anyone posts anything that contradicts your own "self serving" opinion you respond with personal attacks and accusations. Then bleat like a stuck pig when they respond in kind...

So where does the 5TCF for Ruvuma come from. Remember what you accused me of the other day?

Grow a pair, you hypocrite.

Oh CP I am perfectly calm thank you. I have already answered that question before CP. Please refer to my previous answer.

Where did you get that 5TCF figure for Ruvuma CP?

Oh and by the way Drewky no "buts" just facts; surely someone like you who puts so much store in "facts" must acknowledge that?

Pity about the 5TCF for Ruvuma? But as you said the other day Drewky when do you ever let reality get in the way of a good "hype" eh?

Yes you are an arse Drewky and certainly not balanced...Lol!

Please tell me how you arrive at a figure of 5TCF for Ruvuma Drewky? I don't mean because you copied it from CP on the Solo BB by the way.

"It HAS entered into a rig sharing agreement with Heritage Oil...." And your point is what exactly? Is this supposed to get all the shareholders salivating? Fantastic....

"Trading wind changes...."? More unfounded accusations Drewky? So I have been trading since the AGM then eh?! You are a total fantasist.

Coming to the EGM?

"If so, then on issue of that extension licence then the £15.8 million would be reflected."

That assumes that $20 million is the actual valuation and as I have said several times $35 million of credit is NOT worth $15 of cash.... Moreover when oh when has the book value of any assets ever been 100% reflected in the MC CP? Not even cash is reflected at full value these days...

Dear oh dear oversimplified, one-eyed hyperbole.

So you might not question CP's figures caddy but I will. CP how do you arrive at the 5TCF figure for Ruvuma PSA? Is this the Mtwara extension? Don't forget that the Lindi Exploration License has lapsed and we no longer have any claim to that currently....

Maybe you are adding in some element for the Jurassic? Even then I cannot see how that comes to 5TCF.... Moreover to add that in to the Mtwara license would be premature in my view; it may (I stress "may") need a separate license....