Member Info for CrustyPete

Thanks Cleaner, very interesting article.

Roses, what on earth are you talking about?

Oh and I also meant to say that I would rather we do not choose to "sell off" assets prematurely - by which I mean before they have been optimised and close to monetisation - simply to fund the next round of SCIB trials. That would risk the loss of considerable potential future shareholder value and so maybe a "false economy".

So, yes, I can see why our advisers would advise us to "go it alone" so I hope that they have are solution to solving our current "market cap" issue - 13.50p versus our own Advisers valuation of a NPV of 37p. I am sure they would love to be involved in another "fund raise" with the earnings attached to it but they do not have to consider "shareholder value" - that is the BoD's responsibility.

I personally, would be all up for "going it alone" as long as we manage to get our Market Capitalisation up significantly before any further issue of shares. Otherwise surely the dilution would be far less efficient than finding a JV or partnership arrangement? Ultimately any or all of those options involves dilution in one form or another and will surely have an impact upon timescales for commercialisation / monetisation of assets - the bigger question for me is which will offer shareholders the biggest uplift in shareholder value? A premature and significant share issue at a low value Market Cap is surely not the best of those options - unless it is we, the shareholders, that get an opportunity to fund that dilution and not some third party II.

However I question how, without some third party capital injection for a JV or Partnership we get that Market Cap up sufficiently to avoid a heavy dilution?

Trading accounts? Having a wide spread is surely more likely to have the opposite effect and, indeed how does having a bid way below the real market price induce sellers to think they will get back in later and, even more relevant, at a lower price? With a spread at the current levels the sp would have to fall over 7.5% for the current Offer to descend below the current Bid.

Oh and for your information EE, I have "made a market" - in REPO.

Anyway, no matter. I am sure that the MM's wont be able to keep it up for much longer.

That might work moonparty but for the fact that they haven't paid less than 13.15p all day and all but one are at above 13.25. So, if your theory is true, it ain't working!! Perhaps, just perhaps, they ought to try a different strategy? Just stop the "games" and offer the "real" price...... you never know it just may work.

So why simply not make it clear to all, including the mug punters, that you are willing to pay 13.25+p - more people would be more likely to see it and prompted to take the price.

Why do MM's persist in maintaining this ridiculous spread? 12.75 - 13.75p when you can get above the mid price 13.25p for up to 400,000 (quoted 13.275p).

Quite bizarre.

We may get an RNS informing us that the testing has been completed but I suspect that test results will be sent away for third party corroboration before being released as they will be the basis of CPR and Resource estimates. So that is likely to be a few weeks beyond the completion of testing.

Lol. What a fantasist you are C11. I suspect you must enjoy pulling people's pants down.... But sorry, you are yhe one naked from the waist down.

Bye bye.

Oh dear me C11, selective quotes now? Why not finish the sentence, I said that they are not "beginning" to turn but tat they have been "ticking over" for some time! The operative word being "beginning"....

Got it now? Fool.

And no roses, you won't....

Did you actually read what I wrote earlier, or simply choose to ignore it? I did NOT suggest that yhe wheels of commercialisation had not begun, indeed tgat for Modi they had long been ticking over. My pint was that it would not be Modi that moved the dial in the short / medium term. For that we would need to look elsewhere - i.e. SCIB.

I have not had the chance to listen to the webcast, so maybe my opinion will change.

We will see.

Ciaskin you say "product developed and commercialised, " exactly. And none of the products currently in development / trials are yet remotely close to that.

Anyway have to dash.

"The commercialisation wheels" for Glymab A/S are not "beginning to turn" - they have been ticking over for quite a while and are simply continuing to do so.

The real progress is being made elsewhere.

Anyway I have to travel up to London shortly and will not be able to tune in to the 2:00 webcast unfortunately. I hope it goes well and will catch up again this evening.

GLA.

"super negative"?! Lol. No C11 - realistic.

But C11 £6mn every now and then is not going to move the dial - at least it has never done in the past. A lot of water to flow under the bridge before that figure ramps up methinks.

You are absolutely right moonparty, indeed a sizeable Buy rather than a Sell...... the first of several to appear methinks.

Here's hoping.

Yes but there are also some taking the price. Some sells going through below the bid. Anyway, it is of little significance - its the big news we are all waiting for.

I fully expect to see some delayed trades again today BUT this time they will be Buys - yes some of the larger trades of then last couple of days have been difficult to "classify" one way or the other but the price to me has been the barometer of that. The price rise seen after the RNS could not be maintained and yet today the Bid is back up again on not a lot of buying volume.

Ultimately though a partnership, JV and, or some other form of non dilutive funding will be what moves the dial here - daily trading volumes do not appear to do much as there would appear to be a never ending supply of stock available whenever the sp rises even modestly. So we need material news or that "supply" to dry up and ideally BOTH.

Having a fund raise as an option and pulling the trigger are two very different things.