Member Info for CrustyPete

That may be true bb but it also conveniently forgets to mention that in between times the sp has been up and down like a yo-yo; even recently sinking into the 0.30's before then rising to 1.0p - so it has not been a perpetual downward slide and some people have benefitted significantly from those movements. No doubt some of the "naysayers" who have been trading it all the time.

Yarmy, with the exception of our "condensate" and any surplus over our commitments to the TPDC which we can sell to industry, all of ARA/AEX gas is sold at Well head to the TPDC. It will be quite some time before we are producing sufficient to exceed our TPDC commitments and, indeed, commitments that thev are entitled to increase when they choose to.

That in my view more closer reflects and explains the movement we saw at that time rather than the idea that there was a single whale creating a fall to allow them to mop up on the way down.

Sorry McNol my fault I did not fully explain myself - I am suggesting that they managed to get out by Wednesday/ or early Thursday, I am not commenting on today's activity but that of earlier in the week.

McNol, you say "If this were simply a broker redistributing shares, we would see a decaying trend."

is this not precisely what we were seeing on Monday through to Wednesday? From 1.0p down to 0.55p? With very temporary, manufactured (illusory) floors?

As McNol stated yesterday, I believe, SINT trades are those that take place with Systematic Internalisers and that is anyone licensed to trade shares between "clients" internally rather than on an official market places. Those trades may include Institutional Clients but they also categorically include Retail Clients too, not least (as McNol suggested) Hargreaves Landsdowne and many other "retail platforms" such as Interactive Investor, IG and the Banks but not only for its own internal funds. At times such as we have seen in recent days, there will have been huge volumes of retail clients buying and selling simultaneously over these platforms and at these times the platforms can "match" these buyers with sellers, compressing the spread and providing better prices to the end clients. These trades then get batched up and reported to the market thereafter.

So many of those SINT trades could be accounted for due to the above because of the huge liquidity and the volumes of transactions. This is far less likely in a "normal" trading day when the volumes are much lower and the opportunity for matching simultaneous buyers and sellers is much lower.

"Back 2 back" possibly.... ? Looks like one of each.

Must run.

That said roses, if EE's analysis and observations were correct (as they appeared to be), the last time the MM's posted the Ask at 14.0p it was designed to trigger sales and the sp fell shortly thereafter as part of that process, Hopefully, those duped by their "ruse" into selling won't be similarly influenced this time.

Though frankly the day to day sp movement of any great relevance? Not really I suspect as we are all in for the long haul methinks.

I wish you all a wonderful weekend. GLA.

Okay RJ, if you say so; I cannot claim to have much knowledge on the subject, other than the anecdotal refences made here and there , so am happy to accept your analysis. So, taking that on board let me therefore say that nothing I post here is designed to influence anything or anybody - just a place to vent my opinions, comments and observations.

And that may be true RJ for a concert party making a consistent and substantial effort but not, as I do, post once in a blue moon.

Yes RJ, that is no longer true of AEX but the "principle" remains true for small cap shares at least.

So may worries?! Where have I expressed any worries? I have been holding this share for over 15 years for feck sake - as RJ states, had I ever had serious doubts do you think I would still be here? No.

Oh and Element? You say "Crusty is the simply biggest AEX trader on here"..... that is pure and utter speculation and with zero knowledge or evidence. And FWIW "no" I haven't sold any AEX since Q2 last year, indeed only bought them back in December. Am contemplating buying a few more as discussed here only the other day..... Even if it were true as Wryape states, who in their right mind would trade this on the currents spread?!

Anyway do you seriously think anything that gets posted on these boards by the likes of you or me makes any difference whatsoever? Ha, if only.

Wouldn't be surprised to see one or more delayed trades later.....

Buying shares in He1 ahead of a deal of various descriptions would make them a "connected" party and would therefore require shareholder approval and a vote that they themselves would not be able to participate in - so whilst perhaps desirable for multiple reasons would create further complication and delay.

blimey now back to 0.65p bid, as up and down as your proverbial *****s drawers!

That I am afraid is the effect of uncertainty and delay (Rig news).

Congrats McNol, people ought to be thanking you for attempting to keep them involved and not selling. A great rise today; I was expecting a slow and gradual rise having reached that 0.60p floor but nothing as pronounced as we have seen. And with good news still to come - albeit, it seems, no TR1 ;0)

Me too. Just bought 20,000 at 82.0p

A busy week coming up for SCLP then with plenty of exposure.

Https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/veevabasics/posts/?feedView=all

As your trial volume grows, losing control of your data isn't an option.

The team at Scancell is doing incredible work developing treatments for significant unmet needs in cancer. To protect their focus on innovation and speed, Joe Thornton shares why they chose eTMF Basics as their foundation: 👇

hashtag#ClinicalTrials hashtag#ClinicalOperations hashtag#VeevaBasics hashtag#eTMF

The average successful bid for an AIM listed company is between 130% - 150% of the MC at the time of offer.