RE: Dividend policy is flawed5 Jan 2026 12:13
Morning, and happy new year TW investors. Good luck for the year ahead. Stt1, while I agree with a lot of what you are saying, I think you’re being a bit unfair to TW. After all, they are taking a large amount of cash out of the business to return to shareholders each year, while Vistry, well, are not. Yes a small buyback, but no dividend, and nothing close to the £331m TW will be taking away if they stick to their current policy, this year, if payments match last year. That is why I believe, you need to look at total returns. These are the figures for the calendar year just gone, that include dividend payments etc..
PSN 20.2%
BWY 15.88%
VTY 13.52%
BKG 1.02%
TW - 4.01%
BTRW - 8.31%
CRST - 12.76%
FTSE 22.28%
For 2026, what path for Taylor Wimpey? I was quite shocked at the lack of content in their Q3 update. When you read the last few years (Q3 updates that is) they were full of figures, this year, nothing. Hope that’s not an omen, for things to come. H1, 5210 homes delivered, for a profit of £161m and margins of 9.7%, that £161m is after the £20m hit. Total UK average selling price (ASP) on completions decreased by 1.3% to £313k (H1 2024: £317k). If they hit the top end of units expected (10800, excluding JV), that would generate 5590 units for H2. TW are expecting their UK average selling price to vastly increase in H2 to £340k. That would generate £1.9b in sales (H1 £1.654b) They’d need the profit margin in H2 to greatly improve over H1, to get to that magic figure of £424m for the full year, which Wimps are claiming, mainly achieved by that increase in ASP, and pushing margins up. As I’ve stated before, I don’t believe TW are replacing their land as quickly as they are building on it. -3750 plots average per year, over the last four years. That needs rectifying. When you look at the performance figures above for the calendar year 2025, PSN and BWY are the two that are actually increasing their land bank holdings, through investing in the business.
TW’s dividend policy….
Our capital allocation priorities remain unchanged. The first priority is always maintaining a strong balance sheet. The next priority is to invest in the business in work in progress (WIP) and in land to drive growth. After this, the priority is the ordinary dividend payment before evaluating special dividends or buybacks of shares with any surplus cash.
Our Ordinary Dividend Policy is to pay out 7.5% of net assets or at least £250 million annually throughout the cycle.
It appears TW have started to drift away from their priorities and where dividend payments sit in the order of those priorities, and personally, I don’t think it would do TW any harm, or their share price performance, to initiate the £250m payout option. That would still generate a dividend payment of 7p and a sector leading return of 6.58% (based on a SP of £1.063) and leave an extra £81m to start to replenish that lost land, while still sticking to their policies