RE: 4th leaked placing coming?24 Sep 2021 21:06
Agree, DB should be taking action after the first placing, and let shareholders know he is on the case.
He has suggested he is, but nothing visible has changed, so no wonder shareholders are questioning his management of this very serious matter.
I'm sure he is pi**ed off, but not being seen to do anything about it, after the 2nd leak, let alone the 3rd leak is weak.
The SP has slumped, what, 40% on each occasion, meaning even more shares need to be issued at a much lower price than it could have been, resulting in a lack of trust by the market and months, or in this case years, before the SP even gets close to previous mcap values before it happens all over again.
In turn this means that any success only sees a muted response (as we have seen), rather than the good run that should follow.
Sentiment is shot, trust is gone, investors look elsewhere as one of their main requirements is trust in management, especially for II's.
The absolute very minimum he should have done after the 2nd leaked placing is to sack the broker.
DB is slowly destroying this company by sticking with untrustworthy partners, regardless of how good the assets are.
Old school, nice guy management style just does not cut it in this day and age, sadly.
It is the shareholders that are suffering again and again, and DB seems oblivious to their wrath on this issue.
The FCA will do little to nothing. Even if they do look into it, it will be at least 2 years before we hear anything, if at all, given how long they take to review and investigate issues such as this (by past experience).
Many PI's supposedly reported UJO to the FCA after the 2nd leak, and I suspect many more will do so again this time around.
Unless the FCA see any anomalies in SP movements through their own monitoring tools, they will not be in the slightest bit interested in looking further here.