Member Info for Crocqman

Edit to my post from Fri 18:04
It should have read tat I expected a delay until 'sometime in Q1' from the Feb first gas date, and not Q3 as posted.
A simple typo, not intended to rile the likes of DrAim

No TR1's were issued and the names of participants in placings are not released, so no known holder(s) came out from the placing

It's a very good question, will look forward to their answer.
They still have more than 2 weeks for updates to put a positive spin on this if they leave answering until the end of the month.
Disappointed that we have not seen a transparent and detailed plan already, tbh.
Hadn't seen the apparent slip from Feb 2022 to Mar 2022 in the timeline, although I did say that I fully expected a delay until 'sometime in Q3' before the year is out though, so would not be remotely surprised if this is the case.
Standard Angus handling of expectation vs reality, sadly
Good weekend all

I still don't get this continued obsession with posting gas futures prices.
Absolutely pointless until we start producing, and a long way to go to get there yet

Give it a rest.
Stop trying to control this board and the narrative you want
You are relentless and your posts are now repetitive and boring.
Filtered

They are not allowed to hold back price sensitive news.
What is it about this listing requirement that folk don't seem to understand?
They will not be holding anything back 'for maximum impact'
DYOR

Plenty going on here to be excited about for the growth of the company, assuming investors are happy to hold for longer than they may have expected for the SP returns.
Although underwater personally, not expecting great things for the SP until the latter part of 2022 with the various projects on the go.
Not concerned, and will look to add further when funds become available, especially around these current levels.
gla

MoD order for £££billions incoming!!!

EchDelta,
That twitter link, and yourself lost all credibility immediately with the suggestion (yet again) of anyone being short here.
A new poster here and a twitter user 1 month old with a handful of followers is no benchmark to take a view from either way, but all posts show a clear ramper trying to take on the 'other side'.
Good luck with that
It's a pathetic and boring argument (shorters) that has been disproved so many times on so many boards with ZERO evidence that any PI can short any AIM share with ease, and if (IF) it is possible, with ZERO tangible impact on the SP.
I am still waiting for any single shred of evidence that a PI can short this share. 4 years and waiting
So little DYOR from many on these boards, and so many ready to believe any conspiracy to justify their position
Filtered

Hopefully.
Congrats to the MODE team on the accelerated and completed THG rollout.
gla

But you would expect Man City to win at least one game out of 38 in the league this year.
A better use of 'expect' in the case of number of enquiries vs sales by year end?

Having 60m in the bank maybe a good thing for the balance sheet and company security, but it is important for the company (and shareholders) to be seen to be making progress which means continued development and sales.

Are saying that slowly burning through the cash for 10 years, or however long without making any sales at all wouldn't be a bad thing?
And then what, a placing and more of the same?
No wonder posters here find it easy to make attacks on other posters and question their motives/credibility with comments like this.

Agree on the EU launch, Goolang, but they may want to go down the regulatory route (like with the FCA) before they can launch into the EU. I believe AMDLV is an EU directive, so perhaps this already covers any required regulatory requirements there and not too much additional work needed.
Same with Ethereum. Their FCA approval may cover crypto assets, but they may want to do further research here first. Their website is very Bitcoin-centric, as you would expect, with the white paper, focus on millennials vs Boomers, Gen-X, etc. Perhaps they are looking for investment volumes to reach a certain level first (not seen comparative figure, tbh).

Scope too limited for now for me to see huge growth that many are expecting, but merchant growth is happening and will continue as still very early days here.
Much to be positive about here, despite the SP performance of late which although important, is not the only factor to consider when reviewing this company.
gla

Ninetails,
It is the same on many boards.
Everything is either black or white, yes or no.
The polar opposite view is seen as a reality, and there is little to no consideration of any middle ground for the majority.
It is impossible to be pro-UJO (in this instance), but voice concerns over some aspects without being called out as a deramper, non-invested, shorter, etc.
It is the norm.
An us vs them mentality, with posters trying desperately to discredit the 'other side' by any means possible (often foul)
Just like it is the other way around for those who see issues here and little to be positive about.
I see both sides as dangerous, and have recently filtered the majority of the most frequent posters who seem very myopic in their views/opinions. The loudest voices are often the ones to avoid listening to the most and several post far too frequently here to be truly genuine, despite their loud protestations about supporting their investment, or protecting other investors' interests.
One (probably more) is clearly trading this, and has been all this time, despite claims of being a LTH and holding long and adding regularly. Nothing wrong with trading, but it is disingenuous and when caught out as they always are, they always say 'well everyone is a trader as they sell eventually'.
It is to be expected after all. Folks want to protect their investment, but too much emotion involved from many on here.
Much of what is posted here is speculation, manipulation or selective interpretation of figures to extrapolate to a favoured conclusion, outright lies, etc.
There are some good posters though, it must be said
DYOR is always key
gla

So, it was round 11 then for Fury.
Prediction for a few was for round 8 (early in 2nd half of fight) but actual delivery was towards the end of the fight.

A bit like AFC and their aim for delivery by end of H2, rather than expectation for some that this statement would mean in the first part of H2?
A certain symmetry between the two, or is this analogy just stretching the reality?
Patience will be rewarded here (imo), despite a couple of early knock-downs some see as having occurred here this year.
Keep going until the final bell, and don't throw in the towel early.
gla

I have 16/1 on a round 8 Fury win.
Just a bit of fun whilst awaiting news here (still close to 3 months oh H2).
Good weekend all

"It's almost like they're deliberately withholding information either that or their plans have gone awry"

Withholding information is simply NOT allowed and will NOT be happening.
They are also obliged to advise the market of any significant change to ongoing plans, especially if anything has gone awry.

Please stop scaremongering just because you are too nervous about your investment and need constant reassurance. The daily protesting about so-called non-comms, etc is just false speculation and tiresome.

AIM is clearly not for the many on these boards.
DYOR
Take some responsibility for your investment decisions and if you are not happy, take action that will change that by reviewing the reasons for investing, and taking the appropriate decision based on your findings.
gla

Yanis, this will have zero effect and is pointless going on about it all the time.
Just let it go, the obsession on this (non) issue is just not worth it.

Tangible progress and delivery (hopefully on-time) on SFB is the ONLY thing that will shift the SP significantly upwards (imo)

There are NO shorters here.
How many more times?
Clueless/ignorant post

Should give MODE some more visibility.
Can't be a bad thing being further associated with promoting the positives within this space, although not the news most will have been hoping for.