Member Info for Crocqman

So much for the 1p floor that has been mooted for a few weeks.
Wasn't convinced personally, but not because of another potential raise, and still can't see 1st gas before Q2.

For me, I will take this as a potential opportunity to add one last time before 1st gas despite more than 2 years of disappointments over the whole process. Will await the right time though.

A sale of SFB will be best all round for shareholders, imo, especially the long-suffering ones from pre-Brockham.
I gave GL and team a new slate, a chance to move ANGS in a new direction, but the negatives far outweigh the positives with management now, and have done increasingly of late.
They are looking for a quick exit now, take the cash and run.
The placing price is criminal really given the potential bids expected to materialise, a 20% discount to the current SP, but circa 75% lower than the mooted offer that was rejected?
It may at least give an indicator of potential bidders with any TR1's that may result though.

The SFB project will deliver for shareholders with the right people behind it (not to the levels some are expecting, I fear), but I just do not trust the bod to be the people to do this now.

This was all predicted in the charts, or course ;-)

And posting articles almost 10 years old as 'proof' that the markets are rigged/crooked?
Conveniently forgetting MiFID, MiFID II, MAR regulation, amongst several other sets of regulation that have all come into force since then.

But this is AIM, etc etc

The MM's are not holding this back, there are no games being played, and there is no conspiracy.
More than 75% of posts here yesterday were filtered for me, and this was the level of what I could see.
Pointless checking into this now, as it has been for a long time.
Will await news, but the market expects delivery, not talk and delays, whether the reasons are valid, or not.
UJO is well placed to deliver more than currently, but this is what the market is expecting, and so the SP reflects that (ignoring the current economic situation, general market melee, and other outside factors).

Agree jolly.
A quick scan suggests an excellent update, and progress on many fronts.
Hopefully, this will calm some nerves for some, other than the current SP levels which will recover in time, for those with patience.
Good work all at EQT

To be fair, some company websites are very bad, and do not update required information such as director positions, large shareholder details, etc that should be kept up to date, or even any news and presentations.
And navigation is poor too.

TGR communicate well with their shareholders, and it is refreshing to see that they do respond to contact, many do not even acknowledge communication, let alone reply to specific queries.
It is good that they are engaging with shareholders and are willing to take on board comments and suggestions with regard to their website, and hopefully this will be reflected in due course with a better, more professional look that is reflective of a growing company with an excellent range of products in an exciting space.
gl

An interesting set of questions, all on a similar vein, but coming from a different perspective.
Given the timing of their submission, I wonder if these will be answered today, although there is probably little that they can say with the processes in place other than the standard response that they will always act in the shareholders best interest and will provide updates when suitable to do so, as well as reiterating what they have said previously on similar Q's.

Well done ringworm.
A profit never to be sniffed at.
I did similar due to requiring some short term funds, but will be taking a decent position again in due course as one for the longer term, imo.

Average of 8.5 currently, and happy for this to be higher for a larger position
Good luck

Not only can I not believe the incorrect post yet again on this subject (no director buys for a month following a trade), but the number of recommends it still receives.
This has been proved incorrect multiple times on this board alone in the last year.
It really is quite simple to research these types of things to understand what is actually correct in terms of Director buys vs news flow.

Not a big trade, but a trade nonetheless.
Will await further news
gl

Good to see your level-headed posting here as always, aandi.
I, for one, will be adding here in due course (awaiting funds from a property sale)
gla

Say no more, say no more. Nudge, nudge. A nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat!

Welcome Griffy.
The buys showing as sells and vice versa is an age old thing, not any kind of trick or game, just a flaw in the way trades get reported, despite what many will say.
If you think this board is a happy place to be, I would hate to see the other boards you have been on in recent times!
good luck to you

itsawrap.
Correct.
And the FCA take an inordinately long time to investigate, including looking at their own trading tools for irregular activity, etc.
Do not expect a quick response, or, in fact, anything meaningful to come of this, sadly.

swazers filterred.
Have come across him before, and as expected, resorts to abuse himself whilst calling out others for the same.
Just count the number of put-downs towards others in that last 2 paragraph post while claiming to be a victim for being a truth-teller
Disgusting individual too to claim 'mental instability' to describe other posters' views. Says it all.

Post reported for abuse and advertising

DFM,
I have been invested since well before the Brockham fiasco, so delays are very important for long term holders here, and are NOT just an issue for the non-invested (what a tiresome 'go to' argument that is for the board experts).

There are tremendous delays with all onshore O&G companies' activities, due to the nature of the requirements and the (sadly) opposition seen from many who do not see the bigger picture (see UKOG< UJO, etc), but, what investors do not want is the constant stream of timeline slippages and cost over-runs, whether they are due to outside factors, covid, or whatever.

Investors, and the markets, want timelines to be fulfilled, expectations to be managed, delivery to create/enhance a reputation and to generate trust in the company and profits to shareholders.

Whatever your camp, surely a more than 15 month delay to first estimate of first gas, regardless of the circumstances, is a disappointment, no?
And that is without including the even earlier timeframe for Summer 2020 that some still use as the first gas target.
It is not quite the 'turning on the tap' from the previous regime of Vonk, but we were led to believe SFB was a relatively quick and straightforward delivery.

For the record, I made good profits here pre-Brockham (through ignoring the rampers' incessant talk at the time), and am sat comfortably here ahead of first gas/sale, whichever comes first.
And, as I have been saying for 2 years now, I am only interested in SFB, nothing else of the ANGS assets.
gla

VHB,
I certainly read that bit, and it didn't change my view on 1st gas one bit.
Carefully chosen words by the bod.
Some will say what does it matter if a few days into April, but seeing as the initial (realistic) target date was December 2020 (yes, 2020!), and has been creeping back further and further ever since, then a 'few days' past the latest (for now) target date is quite important, especially with potential bidders and funding partners looking on.

I will hold my hands up if Q1 is achieved, but with these golden geese in the background, it is likely immaterial at this stage.
All imo

So, if the markets are acting irrationally, doesn't that then mean that any chart is pointless.
Wouldn't trust any chart on any small cap, or AIM stock anyway as they are generally unpredictable company's anyway.
Each to their own, but the 'trend' this past 15 months or so has been fairly self explanatory and a chart will not predict future with any accuracy with so many variables.
Nice to brag about having so many 'followers' though - hints at some credibility, if nothing else

Q2 for first gas then, as I have been expecting since around September.
Good that the update was not left until the last minute as is the norm here.
Regular updates to come more to satisfy potential buyers, imo, than shareholders, but no complaint on that front.
Which potential buyer will show their hand next?

Yes, haggis did (does?) often write plausible things.
Unfortunately, a lot of his plausible things were proved to be incorrect (or a real stretch of the truth), which he never once admitted.
Just because your comments sound plausible, doesn't make them true, and I am more than happy that a self-proclaimed 'know-it-all' gets called out when false claims are presented as factual, especially when they become aggressive and abusive over it.
Posters can be easily taken in otherwise, accepting comments from a 'respected' poster as being gospel, although I do not subscribe to a view seen earlier that haggis has cost a lot of posters hard-earned money with his posting - if posters make their investment decisions based on comments on here, then they really should not be investing in AIM.

He's probably out hunting a fresh haggis ahead of Burns night tomorrow.
They're pesky blighters to catch