Member Info for CRK22

Erm based on 15 trades 13 of which are sells? Have you been hacked trillsg

Me? The pun? KOD? or AIM?

MLL down 13% overnight on ASX, expect KOD to take a battering today. Pun intended even though it’s tragic

Yes strangely quite BB. I took a bite 15 June. Datt Capital are very keen on ADT1 , there's a blog here: https://www.datt.com.au/blog

Budget - none without further dilution
Timescales - I don't believe they have any idea
Honesty - Not much
Shareholder engagement - zero

Bougouni or bust it seems to me DYOR

Seems odd commenting on a share you're not invested in or not looking to invest in.

This is 40 minutes well spent to provide a framework for some critical thinking on the hurdles for EMH to navigate over the next few years

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj_LhpSxAYM

Quality is king. The right partner , vertical integration and tier 1 battery quality product is everything.

Key questions for me re: EMH is who is the team taking the ore to Carbonate or Hydroxide going to be and what are there credentials and track record?

Any insights into this much appreciated.

GLALTH DYOR

jinxed it colin ;)

Well, time heals all wounds mate. lol

I seem to remember there was a thread on this a while back and tried to find it and bump it so we could look at what we were all thinking at the time regarding what we thought a takeover value of KOD would be.

Anyway, whatever I said at the time I would snap the hand off anyone offering 10m quid for KOD and if put to the vote would probably take less as long as they promised to not give BA a job afterwards. There - I said it. I feel better now.

Been away from the board for a while ARahim.

So - SC now no longer in a position to support to production it would seem. This has been the cornerstone of confidence in BA and SC partnership here and as you have arguably been the biggest proponent of that original assumption it is interesting to see you are now looking at DFS to unlock the way forward.

Talks for finance with banks or normal financing routes wont take place IMO until a DFS is produced.

DFS will require lots of cash for drilling to move inferred to indicated nd expand JORC to something sellable. SC have not looked like providing funding for this and SP is so low that unpalatable dilution awaits this route.

Caution re: spending on gold. I'm in a quandry about this as the quickest way to value in a gold bull market is via expansion of gold resources in cote d'ivoire JV surely? I cant see the return on a dilutive spend on Li JORC expansion having a payback before Li prices improve.

BA speeding tickets boil my proverbial. I don't care about his motivation for doing so but unless there is a specific AIM rule that says he must respond to a request for info (as I believe happens on ASX listed shares in relation to spurious SP bursts) then I'd prefer he kept his mouth shut and afforded long suffering holders the luxury of reducing capital exposure.

Mali political position I make no comment about.

I am becoming increasingly disillusioned with KOD. Their engagement with shareholder questions is non existent and the twitter account is one way traffic only and tweets non value add rubbish in the main and that infrequently.

GLALTH, DYOR and for lurkers with this share on a watchlist beware for here there be dragons.

@Goldenbull, do they fasten round back of head as opposed to behind ears which was the major failing point of the previous millions of pounds worth of masks our government spaffed money at? NR should give Boris a call direct imo.

Daz I think it should have said “Produces Lithium Spodumene tweets”........

From interactive investor candlestick for June 5th

LSE:KOD
05 Jun 2020
Open: 0.035p
High: 0.112p
Low: 0.032p
Close: 0.08p
Volume: 864,769,303

Sold a chunk at 0.0951 to reduce my exposure to the monotony of this share.

Still heavily exposed so in many ways I hope the 120% hubris proves correct.

Sorry INI my mistake clearly my response to the bold I researched assertion that the last time the sp went up by 5.26% it went in to 120% of current share price was well wide of the mark.

Oh no wait between that spurious spike day (during which BA put the brakes on and SORB subsequently sold up a week later) and today it has been my observation that any number of times we have gone up by say 5.26% only to NOT go on to 120% of current sp.

The semantics are meaningless and reality is clear to see in the candlestick charts.

On that spike day I actually reduced my position so I know full well where the sp blipped to and it really doesn’t matter.

I do however find it taxing when someone suggests an upward blip is more meaningful than it is.

One day the prediction will be right but let’s not lose count of the 47 and more times it is wrong.

Enjoy the sunshine folks

No it didn’t. The last time and previous 47 times it went straight back town to opening price either same day or following day.

One day in June it went up to 120% of that price then halved then trickled down to its current price.

That’s actually what happened

Anyone who’s interested can see it on a candlestick chart.

Momentum I guess you wish you'd 5 bagged in 2017 and checked out. I've been in coming up to 2 years in october and that's been painful enough.

Losing patience with this investment even though I believe in the Lithium story.

I suspect there's a couple more years left to run and even if the Lithium rising tide lifts all boats it will only lift those boats not holed below the waterline.

News needed soon re OTA MLA and Funding and I feel like I've been saying that a while now.

Interesting question Matt re: weight comfort. The masks generally in use are currently not heavy at all but not comfortable from what I have seen but that's the cheap and nasty end of the equation. Shifting volumes of these things relies on public buy in in to investing money which effectively cuts their risk to others and generally not the other way round. Its risk mitigation not risk elimination with any of these masks so this is why I ask the question about what graphene brings to the table. Its welcome news sure but its not going to catapult SP back to a quid without follow up applications which could build on the improved public awareness of graphene that this particular application could improve.

Facemasks effectiveness are only as good as the filtration bypass which occurs. While its nice to see a product and some orders, this IMO can't be considered a gamechanger. Furthermore I would ask the question as to what graphene brings to the facemask party that is not already provided by any other facemask which meets the same specification.

2024 feels a looong way off