Member Info for cperkin

https://twitter.com/**********/status/1465948041958014978

https://tinyurl.com/5feew2d8

I see your new company has about as many names as you have had on LSE Dan ;0) Hydrogen One changed to Hydrogen future industries now, hope you did not change the name to try and hide after the SP article..................... pmsl.

Changed name on the 19th November, 9 days after the SP article.

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13508782

That is the plan, although I think there is growing resistance from large long term holders the closer we get to the spud date.

Thanks Dan, the first piece of research you have contributed I think so gave it the thumbs up.

I don't think it applies to the Ruvuma asset development by the way as it is 75% funded to production by the Omanis and the gas is currently ear marked for Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda which fits exactly with the last paragraph in the article.

I expect this will be exactly the point that the BOD will make on any recommended offer for Ruvuma in terms of long term ability for SCIR to fund through FFD, a gift maybe.

Oh it's your own internal estimate, not based on the actual numbers published for the CH1 drill then.

Well as already concluded, it all depends on if they sell the asset before any money is needed for the Q3 2022 drilling, so plenty of time. As I remember it the old BOD put in place the funding for NT2 via a placing 3 months prior to the spud date, so that would be about June/July 2022 for CH1.

Still comes down to sell or set up the funding for Q2 2022 with the drill Q3

Folks, please don't be suggesting that the BOD are holding back price sensitive information due to internal political reasons, this would only tarnish an already very bruised and tarnished image of the Board.

Oh Dan, the latest public info for the drilling costs is around $4 to $5 million, that's USD and not £ so £3 to £3.75 million and currently scheduled for Q3 2022.

Morning all.

Well nice to see we all agree on something, that the drilling of CH1 due in 7 to 9 months time is not funded. The BOD have of course repeatedly made it clear that they will fund the drill if the asset is not sold before hand. According to the BOD there are multiple interested parties.

So we are back to sell Ruvuma or fund for Q3 2022.

" It is a FACT that SCIR do not have funding for this years work programme."

More fantasy Dan, there is a little more than a month of the year to go....

Take a break m8.

"looking at your portfolio"... are you now claiming to have hacked my trading account and have some idea of my holdings Dan, or is this just your next out of your depth feeling/ fantasy in a what seems to be a long continuous line?

Like I said yesterday Dan, if you can provide some evidence that backs up your opinion/feelings, then I am all ears, Alas & after asking at least 5 times now, you fail to produce anything meaningful that provides any foundation to your feelings/opinions and thus as concluded they are just that.

There you go again, squealed like a stuck pig about personal insults on this bb today and what do you do when we try to have a grown up conversation? resort to personal insults on the very same thread.

You can't provide any evidence to back up your "opinion" and thus one must conclude it is based on uneducated feelings alone.

Dan, you were squealing like a pig earlier about personal insults whilst posting and now we try to have a grown up conversation and one you clearly can't handle you immediately resorting to personal insults.

When you present some relevant evidence maybe your opinion (feelings) might have some validity, unfortunately you appear to be incapable.

Dan we used to use straw men in the mid 90's in management, well in proper companies that is, not AIM & never mind the most unregulated listings that you currently frequent ;0)

Back to the question and the 3rd or 4th attempt today Dan. So no evidence to provide then as to why the Government are not interested in developing their gas assets whilst they have the window of opportunity?

The question shareholders should be asking and talking about is if it's the right time to sell, accepting the development costs required to reach EPS.

Thanks for the response Dan.
So clearly you can not present anything evidence based even after several requests to back up your feelings but would rather refer to some outdated mid 90's management speak about strawmen.

Thanks for the confirmation.

Dan, I presented you with links regarding the current Government attitude to developing gas in Tanzania, you keep referring to the previous Government, Cabinet and Energy Minister. Old experience is old experience. I invite you again and for the final time to present some evidence that backs up your opinion that the Government are not interested in developing their gas assets whilst they have the window of opportunity.

Like I have posted many times, it looks like a good time for a buyer based on the current Governments intent to develop their gas assets whilst they can for the benefit of their people. The question shareholders should be asking and talking about is if it's the right time to sell, accepting the development costs required to reach EPS.

Your welcome Dan.

So you don't have any "Recent" evidence as in post new President, Cabinet and Energy minister then Dan?

Thanks

Chris

Dan,

I have even presented evidence (which no doubt you did not bother to read) So prey, now provide some "recent evidence" post the new president, cabinet and Energy minister appointments, oh and of course the publication including "A window of opportunity" for Tanzanian to monetise their gas that backs up your claims.

I understand your opinion is personal, but please provide any recent evidence that you can point to that would suggest as you say that the Government will not swiftly back a no risk route to monetisation of the country's gas assets?

Thanks Dan.

I see Dan, so if they sell it at around £15 million ($20 million) then all your current theories and posts will have all been completely wrong, including the Gov approval, who by the way seem to be fast tracking and approving Gas projects since coming to power.

Dan you not going to tell us about your extensive African and Tanzanian experience in the O&G sector that you posted yesterday?
I was wondering if this is what you used to create your $0 valuation for 25% he Ntorya accumulation of 3,024 Bcf (8,236 Bcf unrisked), with a mean risked recoverable gas resource of 1,990 Bcf (5,419 Bcf unrisked).

I don't think the BOD or shareholders could accept anything less than the $20 million deal that AEX accepted for 25% myself.

Voices in your head again Dan? the Sherriff must be coming ;0)