Member Info for countingcards

Yes Chris

Nothing other than Try and see if you are able to still get your vote through if you have a nominee account. If you are unable to then please use the email address I provided and get in touch. I will try and guide you if you still want to go ahead. I have also missed the deadline with my own broker and now am trying to remedy the situation. Thanks to the people already who have emailed.

Jace thanks for the reply but was concerned about the HL nominees. Not sure how many missed out on Halifax so maybe some posters can show hands on here and if a few may be see what can be done.

Hi
If anyone is with Hargreave Lansdowne and was unable to vote due to cut off can you please get in touch with me on satoship12345@outlook.com and I will explain later tonight why I have requested. Thanks.

A_milli (it was for 62m done at 3.47pm 25th July 2019)

Caterham7

Posted in: BOU

Posts: 84

Price: 0.027

No Opinion

RE: ask ..25 Jul 2019 12:10
That was my top up. I have played similar RTO situations before, and done very well out of them - BOU has all the credentials I look for. Surprised my buy didn’t move the SP!

TRA

Thanks for that. Simple MA over 50 days did crossed over on the 15th July 2019? with the 200 day MA. Strange this is it then began moving down but despite that has not gone under the 200 day MA again (good sign but still need to move on upwards).

Last two days have been irritating TA wise as the buyers have backed off while we have one or two stray sellers taking us down in what is supposed to be a confident upward channel. MM also look fine to take the stray stock.

I used another site for its data which I will give a clue is going downhill quick and its data looks time lagged hence you were right and my earlier statement was incorrect. Nice one Tra thanks.

Applegarth

Thank you mate a lot of respect for you and your focused posting.

Tra

Correct me if I am wrong mate as you are good at figures. I have got the 50 day MA sitting at 0.029 and the 200 day MA at 0.03351. We swung above the 50 day MA a couple of days ago but a couple weak sellers dragged us below it again today . Do you see what I am seeing? and that the two are about to collide?

Micheal Caine time again "you're only suppose to blow the bloody doors off!"

Applegarth based on your post at 17.18hrs, it is clear to me what you are saying we need to focus on BOU and all the news related to BOU. Its a great contrarian play and if and when it delivers as Micheal Caine said "you're only suppose to blow the bloody doors off!"

Correct me if I am going off subject mate?

I believe its time to focus on the game in front of us, as we are close to kick off time, rather than 2 people in the crowd of thousands. If you are confident in your team it matters not what a couple of people say with opinions right now. If you are not confident then by all means keep listening and deciphering the named posters and not on the game. I am not singling out anyone in particular, but some are falling for the bait.

BOU could not be in a better position right now. Its gone quiet, and the volume is low. Confirmed news is all we have and all we are waiting on.

Do you think Antos was stupid enough to put in over £1m into the company which he could have easily taken for £400k? Agreed RTO has not been announced but that does not mean it will not be announced.

” The way I see it” as you put it, is merely your own interpretation and we need to respect that as this is what the bulletin board is for, “The way I see it” type of posts which make up around 90% of all posts (in my view). “I don’t believe” also falls into the same category. It’s all your own opinions based on how you interpreted the information.

Sadly I have read you have sold up your shares which is a shame as there was a ready made buyer for them who would have taken them off your hands for a sensible price. Now that is a non-event.

Ma?afir? amici o forse simili? smetti di giocare a gatto e topo con l'acqua ..

Really Jace? I thought it was a clearcut buy. Check the time. I am looking at another platform not at LSE for trades.

In September 2017, prior to the final Ivrea Court winding up petition hearing, the Company entered into a €500,000 loan agreement with a UK private company (the “Lender”) to enable Clear Leisure to purchase €4.3 million of debt at an 88% discount to face value from a creditor of Mediapolis Srl.

On 9 March 2018, it was announced that the Company had agreed with the Lender to settle €250,000 of the loan through the issue of 22,321,429 new ordinary shares of 0.25p in Clear Leisure each, at a price of 1p per share. In the first five months of 2019 the Company has repaid additional funds to the Lender.

The Board is pleased to announce that Eufingest SA, (“Eufingest”) has provided Clear Leisure with a further unsecured loan facility to settle the full outstanding debt owed by the Company to the Lender, including accrued interest, for €200,000.

Under the terms of the loan agreement, Eufingest has provided €200,000 at an interest rate of 2.5 per cent per annum. The loan is repayable on or before 31 December 2019.

Eufingest has also agreed to extend the repayment of the following loans from 30 June 2019 to 31 December 2019 (or such earlier date as may be agreed with the Company):

€50,000 and €250,000 as first announced on 07 December 2017 and 02 January 2018 respectively; and

€200,000 as first announced on 03 October 2018

(together “the Eufingest Loans”)

All other terms and conditions of the Eufingest Loans remain unchanged.

Eufingest is a substantial shareholder of the Company as defined by the AIM Rules for Companies. The new loan and the extension of the Eufingest Loans repayment dates are therefore related party transactions pursuant to AIM Rule 13 of the AIM Rules for Companies. The directors of Clear Leisure, having consulted with its nominated adviser, consider that the transactions are fair and reasonable insofar as its shareholders are concerned.

Larry

Appreciate the time you put in to reply to me. I also did notice the depth you went to in your research, but we all have a life so I did not go into the other 50 pages of your posts. I am not intending to either.

It’s the same story everywhere. It doesn’t matter which BB you pick it’s the same woes. I stick to my first words that no one hears has to worry about your posting, they need to be on the ball with the management directors etc. I site the example that I have been involved in another investment which was on its last legs, and attended a GM which has now found a new path. The greed that goes on is unbelievable if it goes unchecked. This particular one was challenged and now the brave holders have been rewarded for sticking to the truth. It’s your right to challenge the management here, until they deliver.

Pmac

I have been quiet for a number of personal reasons and don't feel the need to post everyday, as its not where the money is made my friend. In regards to "they" and "their", the post was purely regarding Rusty.

Well Larry your second ever post told me everything I needed to know about your mindset and thinking patterns. Its also more than likely you use other handles or would not hesitate from it to get your agenda across. Don't believe me? The post is dated 4th April 2018, and has the sentence “you’re still insisting on trying to second guess me. I’m not pretending to know anything.” Your very first EVER post was on taxation and ISAs and rather helpful. Did you forget who you were posting under? “you’re still insisting on trying to second guess me."? Seems very odd for a second EVER post.

If anything I think you are your own enemy and any losses you incurred are due to your own bad judgements, but you also do not wish anyone else to be able to think clearly or that there should be continuation on this BB.

Honestly I don't think anyone here has anything to be worried about especially when you post.

I can see your cards.

Wow! I promised myself to try and limit the posting but amazed at the behaviour of some towards others and I knew this will begin when the food levels get low. Hunger can make anyone’s blood sugar levels get the better of them.

For a start many may not know Rusty but I do personally and I know they do not have an ounce of ‘deramp’ in them. I know this as they have had meetings with CEOs and also been kind enough to share only what they able to share. That’s an asset to have on your side.

If they decide to sell up that’s their business and only their business and based on their findings. Maybe the mistake was not to post they sold because only knowing that someone buys is allowed!

Have we had the RTO? No, Have we any further proof Antos has bought again? No, Has he been made a director? No. Those are critical questions, and individuals have their own sensible deadlines. Fail to meet those deadlines and one has to remain disciplined and not EMOTIONAL, and decide the correct route. Rusty did based on their own criteria.

I may be siding with Rusty but I know their intentions are honest. A_Milli your posts have always been a credit to read and hopefully they will continue and I am going to excuse the fact you do not know Rusty and posted your reply.

I removed myself from external twitter group recently because of one individual who I know was talking BS, and was acting as the speaker because he had spoken to Antos.How do I know? Take a guess what I do? I reported that back and thankfully they have been blocked because half the stuff they reported was their own take. Sorry guys in the twitter group for bursting a bubble but I thought best to remove myself than get into an argument with the individual.

There is a lot I can say but I would rather keep that in confidence. Good luck Rusty and good luck who may have read Rusty wrong.

So my take is that further stock was needed and still is. The price moved backed over the last few sessions to weed out weak holders. Give them enough pain and if that is not enough we will send down on the BBs enough soldiers to mess with the holders mindset. Make them question why they hold and hey! you never they may sell up.

Keep the price dropping and keep the spread wide, that will be enough to keep Joe Public out, and meanwhile someone keeps accumulating. Maybe the people being negative. Oh and one last thing - just now 14m got bought in 13 minutes, and the offer headline price jump from 0.06p to 0.07p. Spread is massive right now to deter any traders, and if you are smart you will know why. Someone WANTS stock. Well that's how I read it.

Good luck guys was looking in and helping a friend who told me to look at this.

Sausage

So you are basing your conclusion on an event that happened a lot earlier than the 5 minutes I outlined. You think the day it rose 500% was a ramp as the price went from 0.02p to 0.15p and then settled at a new level where we are now. That's fine, but this is the first time someone has used that period to justify a ramp. What about those all weekend and since who are not using that time but rather the period AFTER 13th June? I want to hear their argument as to why this has been ramped? what set of criteria are they using?

Can anyone accusing this of being ramped kindly explain that the price moved from 0.05-0.06p to 0.055-0.07p just now on ONE SINGLE BUY of 3.8m.

Is that a ramp or an attempt at a pump?

Can you explain to me at what point was there a ramp on this? Was it prior to June 13th? I ask for the following reason.

To class this as a ramp or pump it would have had to be sustained over a period of time. Since the price lay flat at 0.06-0.065p, or roughly around where it is now, then where is the pump?

On the 13th when the last RNS hit, the price moved rapidly in 5 minutes from 0.06-0.065p at 14:11:06 hours to 0.09-0.095p by 14:16:05, OK 1 second short of 5 minutes exactly.

This is such a short time to conclude this was ramped or pumped, as prior to this the price was static and hardly anyone was posting. In that 5 minutes 49.5m shares were bought in whatever denominations. That is a massive amount to be going through the books in such a small time, and hardly enough time to draw breath.

So those accusing this of being ramped or pumped? Are you basing your findings on the current pullback from the 0.09-0.095p area back to exactly or almost where the price was just prior to the RNS. Can you give good reason why you believe it was ramped, since I find it hard to see any cause for a ramp prior to price moving or rampers to have enough time to have acted.

I am looking but not buying just yet.