RE: Times article8 Jun 2024 15:11
it comes across as a biographical, because it is a bio piece? i don't see much there that's egotistical at all.
tbh you r recent negativity simply comes across that your ****ed a buyout didn't happen in your time frame, which is understandable, i completely get it but does seem jaded. though it was the same way when you were positive.
1-3 just seem non issues and kinda nitpicking, 1-2 are about his maybe adhd, autism and whatever. your then just making leaping statements about what he doesn't do at thg, we have no idea what he's been doing with the city and not what it's really about.
4, just a market statement, hardly putting a spotlight on it at all, is kinda well known no?
the more interesting comment i found to be when he's asked about the hyper processed food fad that's somewhat around. this is something that is like more insight into than was stated in his reply.
5.
not really interested in people.who want to flog nutrition or beauty when it's worth a fraction of its value just to make a quick buck as they wanted it gone already. yes thg could have done things to push up sp by now. fact kelso have stated majority stake as well shows they aren't here to realise true values. ingen i view as different, as it's immature, kinda, but again, why would you want to give away majority?
kelso clearly are ****y they aren't getting what they want, which is understandable, but i don't want them making decisions on business as they seem to have short term goals. there trying to cause discord as much as possible, they are only here for their interests , not thg or long term investors.
#no thanks
Sign In
Follow the stocks
