Member Info for Cong

Though now I think I've confused myself on what they are so just ignore me .

Hey OSG, yea sorry didn't mean that you said that specifically, I was referring to what you just quoted, but summarized in my own way

Isn't the problem though that MA fecks around with the companies he invests in, like OSG pointed out. I wouldn't be surprised if he's had a big hand in fing the SP since he invested

To be fair if every rise on positive news wasn't utterly decimated then we'd be doing alright.APN doesn't seem to have that problem. Lucky bastardos

Looks like lse agreed with your assessment and deleted everything.

@rob who knows. what's ****'o'clock?

Alright old man steve, calm down. Congrats on the beer, honestly surprised you're able to drink anything with your colostomy bag stuck in reverse mode.

Hey davffed.

This share is just crazy in so many ways inc people.

Very much hope he will!

Matt slater the shortest about darktrace and was very vocal about it. Maybe they have grudges they don't wish to let go of?

Who knows.

davffd doesn't make sense..it's just **** talkers.

looks like monimanz stanley b has created another account. who else would reference stanley b.

as for the vague accusations

why change the name from but group? because it was a separate trading subsidiary and they used it to move ingen off and wanted to have it completely separate from the hut group.....

how has ingen bought back 181 million thg shares? they didn't, matt moulding moved his shares from his gurnsey holding into uk holding?

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/thg/pdmrpca-shareholdings-u1bdmys1lkr3f1n.html

alistair crane - not on companies house. is t there rules about exec chairman's / non voting roles.not needing to be listed? i think so.

I'm very tempted to try milkshake on next order

Lol sj74. True dat. Fing city spy 😂

There coffee and walnut is really good the Jimmy's one though is very very good, you can have it like a latte or short drink. It's amazing as iced latte.

Mars one was damn nice, didn't like Snickers though the peanut flavour was very strong, but I admit it def tasted like the bars

Whats up with the constant messages trying to make this Winnie poo guy and what he's saying be constantly in the chat board

I asked @100 who he thought was accumulating and that got removed as well lol

OSG my recollection, was that the decision not to pay hmrc vat stemmed directly from the result. It's a bit hazy as I believe the actual result was known about quite a bit before we were informed. But it's really hard to say wether it was 21 days after. Regardless he was very clear about paying hmrc until the result was known.

Also hmrc applied directly to appeal to lower and it was refused this mean they had to apply to higher, from my understanding as the appeal was denied there isn't anything after, unless they made a significant error of fact there would have been no need or reason for 21 days to apply after the denial , it was pretty much dead. All imo,.not legally trained

Got a few tops for gym, quality was decent vs price. I bought one then some more so guess it was good enough. If I wanted more gym stuff that's where I would look first ATM, I also got a gym shark but the MP is better

The general indication** from multiple people on the other forums and chat that have a lot better understanding of the situation than I do. And on actually looking at what's being said. It has been specifically stated by some that the FRC picked it up, which seems the most logical scenario in the absence of more information. Obviously it's still just people, but that's all we got ATM. Hopefully this is all that it is

The indication is that the FRC picked up on a missed procedural step. That's all. Nothing more .

There's no chess here

It's exactly what they set out to do, it's the same as what was passed before. They simply missed some kind of administrative step which was picked up and now they have to correct it.

If it personally affects you then no agm vote can remove your rights or force you to agree any kind of indemnity against you personally. there doesn't seem to be a thing to be furious about.

It simply puts it in a place / parties where it should have been if done correctly.

Or so it appears, without any other kind of information.

No new money, most likely just an account of money that can't be used for xyz and they need to move the money into the account that can, in very basic terms. Financials havnt changed .