Member Info for Colourbounce

If CC was an animal Tony, it would have been put down a while ago. In better hands, Cyan could have gone places, but we have been unlucky with personnel who have called it wrong at pretty much every stage.

Indeed Tedders, a born salesman always lets his customers know his mark up. We are lucky to have him.

Anyone remember when JC enthused about India not wanting accreditations and standards, that nonsense was only for USA and EU? Errr wrong once again JC.

Forget it, that's old now, and all meters were well tested prior to the reverse auction. If CC were not in the running, how could they possibly have missed it, they have been talking about just these contracts for years! EESL are happy with chosen hardware, and the solution method, it has all been tested done and finished. Cyan lost it, they must have been involved if they have any credible offer. To back that up, you and others here, cannot accept it is placed and progressing without us. Now tell me you weren't expecting CC to be involved.

Come on LTI, the first commercial rollout in India, our looooong term target market, and we didn't even enter the room? If that is correct, even you must be doubtful what our expensive team of experts are doing over there? More to the point, this is the start of EESL and 250 million, and we are possibly not at the races?

All very informative LTI, but CC lost the first round of a contract they have been nailed on to win. The CEA are just another toothless agency, that report what some here want to hear. EESL went through a long testing process in the field, with live results, and came out with a system that suits a 5 million rollout. They know CC very well, and are well aware of their offering. India love the product, awards tell us that, but they don't need it clearly.

While we are on answering questions Tony, I asked you how many techies CC employ a number of weeks ago. You seem to believe the R&D spend will fall dramatically or even disappear, as the product is good to go? As no answer came back, I assume you made it up.

Ok, the first 5 million contract, that sets the standard ( and they are very happy with so will not be turning back on ) does not have always on ability. They don't need it, and the contract is rolling out very well for them. Pre paid is the clue Tony, read your link and have a guess what % will be pre paid accounts. My guess, fwiw, is 100.

Work it out Tony. Only one question that needs an answer, does the chosen EESL method have an 'always on' ability? You can work it out I'm certain.

LTI,, I believe the floor may well be yours.

One thing JC can do is sell the 'we are on the cusp' dream. I suspect he has another one or two dilutions, to keep the obscene salary coming in for a while. There are a few on here that will happily run with it.

My guess woolie, funds are on the floor, no orders to generate meaningful income, and 2 or 3 placings before the company sinks or swims. The first of those will be being planned right now, the BoD probably have no words for the performance shown.

good to repeat yourself over and over on here, so here's my view on where this car crash sits. We have a BoD who dance to the tune of a time wasting nation who clearly don't have the funds to support themselves, let alone us lot. CC solution, in this first EESL example is not required. With the massive number (85%?) of pre paid accounts, why would you need an always on reporting system? This should have been identified years ago, do CC know the pre aid numbers going forward? Not a clue is suspect. HB, has no time for the UK rollout, 'you can't make money from it' apparently, and he is our COO remember, not the cleaner. How he hasn't openly retracted his words is puzzling. Unless of course he truly believes it, which proves Connode to be the White Elephant the sellers thought they were. They have been played with the box tick exercise of pilots everywhere, little cost and no commitment from the customer. Years ago our partner L&T tried to launch their own rip off version of software, this while pilots where running!! And JC was delighted when it failed. Maybe he should have done a little more than clap his hands and say 'you need us'. The weeks events in Delhi would have been jolly fun I am sure. Picking up another, obvious, award is frankly pathetic. History tells them, we will keep funding the circus if we get one. A worthwhile message would have been no staff rushing to the stage to accept it, and let it be known we cannot keep attending because we are as skint as they are. CC is worthless right now, wrong board with wrong market, means it may be for some time.

The denial here is incredible vas. This first real commercial rollout is the blueprint, it works because they don't need 'always on' CC board have called it wrong, again.

We are talking about EESL, I did tell ya. That's where the big contracts are right now and I know you don't like to hear it Tony, but they are not buying Cyan, deal with it.

I did tell ya.

Given their size, trading nation and specialist field, how do L&T get away with not having to part fund the ISGW circus ? CC should try it sometime, there is too much respect given to these non trading roadshows, and JC does like to follow them around the globe.

Lol, sorry woolie, how's that.

Shhh, that's an MM code.

IndiaSmartGridWeek‏ @ISGW2018 � 30m30 minutes ago  More Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation (CESC), Mysore wins Platinum Award in the category Best Smart Grid Project in India by Utility during ISGF Innovation Award. Kabooooom : )