Member Info for Colourbounce

The next 5 million tender is for GPRS. It works. The CC tale you are hooked on is the signal needs to be a constant, it doesn't.

First thing you need to do is forget UK, India isn't a county like say Suffolk lol. They have gone, and are still going, GPRS. They don't need 'always on' Tony, one of your Notspots will get a signal at some point, which will be perfectly adequate for the customer base so far.

Given JC and Boris have had 'some very nice deals' out there in the past, you would think they could get round such obstacles. And with MD Anil born and bred into it, even more so. But hey, with all the experience and knowing so much about this space, none of them saw GPRS coming, hence the silence.

Morning Tedders, can you give a brief idea on the TNEB fiasco? Looks like they are ready to waste a load more time with someone else soon.

Morning LTI, I have far from run out of things to say, as you possibly know. If you are referring to CC working orders, they clearly haven't been delivered? I am trying to stick to what we know, and what we know right now is CC will be missing massive numbers if EESL carry on this path. A company statement is way overdue, on this alone, but that is for another day.

That is a JC , keep the game going , response LTI. You've either had those lines from them, or have been here too long.

Hello LTI, we all know the difference between RF and GPRS, even Tony. EESL have control of the lions share of CC target business. I am beginning to really think you are not getting this. CC business model relies on huge numbers, take away EESL and you lose massive scale in one hit. That, as it stands, is what is happening. I cannot believe you are struggling to see it?

Talking of giving credit, and realism, EESL are clearly far enough into the first contract to know GPRS was the way to go, hence this 2nd tender. So, as I told you at the time, the system was tested, it works to a level they want, and they, at least, are happy. All of my last line, when posted before, was contested by most 'realists' on here, fancy another go? Lol

We assume CC know who EESL are, I wouldn't put it past them. EE who?

Anyone with sense will just get involved when it goes reverse auction woolie,

Harrys new product, I have on good authority, is a machine that takes telephonic transmission of scanned-in printed material (text or images), usually to a telephone number associated with a printer or other output device.

Tony, you prove yet again that you don't understand a tech stock. CC are pulled through an ever changing cycle, and R&D spend needs to keep up with that cycle, or they are dead in the water. It doesn't end, it will never end, just change and generally change upwards. Whatever the tech spend is now, will likely be as small as it gets. Stick to your FTSE screen.

Not sure what that is reporting vas, but looks interesting, thanks.

But wouldn't each buy trigger a declaration?

Tedders has a very good point Tony, I feel you may well be trophy laden soon : )

Hi 2cv, despite my intention to dump and run a while ago, I haven't sold a share. I did add not long ago, purely for the obvious, it's as simple as that. Whilst I will not be going anywhere, I do doubt CC have the clout or knowhow to land the project. As the market has evolved so slowly, I am fully expecting a big name to be in place with product price and timing that will take out large contracts globally. It's what they do, and often even the market don't see them coming. Time will tell.

Here goes. I actually enjoy it here, most of us must do, or we wouldn't do it. I'm not talking down my investment, that's a myth peddled by some who don't like hearing negatives. It is often more a case that the posters with absolute refusal to believe this could go wonky, will post almost anything to try spinning CC into any and all tenders in motion. I genuinely don't get that, it annoys me more than CC saying nothing. So my motivation is here, to enjoy this banter, hope it comes good, but keep questioning the desperate. If that makes me, and a few others, Trolls, you should re evaluate your own methods here.

LTI, if I had said this in the negative, you and others would have been all over it asking who had given me the information. dwall just comes out with it and, because it's what you want to hear, there is no question it must be correct. It really is laughable, and more than desperate.

Yeah, well done dwall, you've contributed nowt to our knowledge base, which puts you up there with JC, Tony and Wino lol.

Until you give something relevant, your FWIW is worth stuff all Dwall. FWIW I have had confirmation of the SI involved in the huge Smart Lighting rollout with EESL.