RE: Trolls1 Jun 2020 01:56
I've said a few times now that I couldn't begin to defend directors' remuneration at rkh but this site is a discussion board for the shares of rkh. To serve that purpose it would have to be more forward looking than the therapy sessions that several damaged profiles treat it as.
Ok so uphimself , ralphski, godawfulski and others have been badly damaged but I'm afraid we're interested in the likely future share price and what will drive that. These guys are so trapped by their past they can't get a way from it and think its the only thing that matters. They only ever talk about current and past share prices. It would take more than me to release them from mental jail, and they sound like they're in for a life sentence anyway so lets leave them there
Meanwhile, on planet earth, we're looking at $37 oil as I write.
FIG likely to play ball on helping when the time comes - and the stated project breakeven cost of $40 a barrel includes costs that must provide some scope to come down a little in current conditions. In addition it includes at $10 or so of royalties to FIG.
Plus PMO are progressing with sorting their North Sea acquisition and associated financing which would move them further on with deleveraging.
And the politics around UKEF and FI oil have never been better.
O Mare is also there.
We're still in the game with 30% of a 250 million barrels phase 1, circa 500 million barrels including phase 2 and exploration potential.
Really, for those not jailed by their past, it is quite an intriguing few months to come.