Member Info for CitizenTS

Gawd Shaun, certainly the trolls on here have no hope for the future. Dead as can be.
They're ex-shareholders who want the company to go bust because they don't have the b*lls to get back in.
The uphimself, godawful and getpoo profiles are zombies, defeated by their own past.
Intriguing few months to come. But no use to this lot as they don't hold any of these.
Dead on the inside but still posting.
You should recognise zombies when you see them.
Yours to take Shaun!
Seen the film - Shaun of the Dead?

Talking of dead horses, ralphski, funny how it's actually the ex-shareholder trolls who endlessly repeat their own dead history.
Dead as dodos. No enlightenment to offer toanyone, or even to themselves.

I mean, Ralphsky, wonder why would that concern you!

Ralphsky, a bit touchy are we that our friend Finley who doesn't hold any has simply said so!

Findlay, at least you've been honest enough to say you no longer hold any of these.
Better than some.others on here!

I couldn't begin to defend directors' remuneration here, and it would be very wrong to try! But we do need to have the facts straight.
Uphimself refers for at least the second time to 12 million shares but as I understand it rkh state clearly that the changes are for two amounts.
Firstly, 18 million shares that the directors are ALREADY entitled to under LTIPS at 1p or zero are replaced by shares at 6.25p.
Secondly, circa 3 million new share options instead of salary at zero cost I think.
Better alignment but yes, no real reduction in remuneration.
So the extra shares are the 3 million instead of salary.

Well you haven't held any of these for a while Godders so a bit of 'retro-fit' justification is all we expect from you.
And if the ducks should line up then politics have never been better for UKEF and rkh.
As for cost, the UKEF cash is a mere drop in the ocean in terms of government spending. Getpoo and others may miss the point of what UKEF does, but its cash creates work in the UK, and with massive leverage/efficiency compared to the furlough scheme!
None o'these guys hold any shares in rkh, none of their crap mentions the share price, and none of them stand to get ha'pence if this happens - all they'd get is grief that they're not in, so let's see.

I don't think some of our regular posters are 'here', in the sense of owning shares, and they will fade away even more than they already have from this site over the coming months.
The prospects of O Mare coming to life, PoO moving up a bit more, and FIG making at least some move towards reality to get this going will pass these guys by. But those prospects make for an intriguing next few months to say the least, especially starting from here share price-wise.
Fwiw my take on what remains of the trolls chorus is that, unlike Gozziesky, these are profiles that used to hold shares, but have been shaken out more recently and no longer do. That's how, for example, the ridiculous Godders can so easily say he hopes Rkh goes bust!
None of them have the b*lls to get back in. Upside all ours if the 'ducks line up' over next few months.

Yes, I now concur!

Slightly too loosely stated to believe methinks.
Too soon I'd say, though give it a few weeks.

Paul Drayton - Signs of early progress in these contacts?
Would be stupendous but can you tell us any grounds to think so?

Am with the efforts on remuneration but, for me, its all about maximising the likelihood of getting SL done and bringing home the highly concentrated upside to shareholders.
So I won't killing us off by voting to dismantle the board leaving us wide open to every conceivable vulture.
The non-execs need to stay there so that we have a company.
I will just be voting against on resolutions 4 and 5 (CFO and CEO) and would advise others to do the same.

Waiting game Cynuski?
Here"s news for you - public company shareholders don't manage the company day to day.
An announcement yesterday and basically you say to us you're disappointed no news today!
Just a troll

Surfit, well yes FULL detail would be everything, if everything was ever possible.
However what Cynuski serves up is pretty selective.
After dropping a pebble in the water about needing $55 PoO for SL (where's that gone now), a narrative that manages to actually ignore the share price in assessing risk and return (well we already know he doesn't hold any of these) and bleating endlessly that nothing is being done about pay and costs, he's now telling us someone, somewhere, elsewhere, said something that is wrong.
Okaaaayyyy, does that advance us any?
What it does do is mean Cynuski runs his copypasty drivel on here wasting our time.
He trespasses on our goodwill in the service of who knows what.
He doesn't hold any of these.
As they say Surfit, use a long spoon if you sup with these guys!

Blimey off Copypasty goes again.
Struggling to say anything
Hiding a few of his own comments hidden between the quotation marks.
Seems like decent news is the last thing this paid up trolls chorus member want to hear.

Fuddstone ?? somehow you seem to miss the bigger numbers (think I did say 'mostly', really to avoid this).
Fwiw, and to give a reality check on the bigger numbers, here's the para on the LTIPS
"In place of the LTIP scheme, executive directors will receive options to subscribe for an aggregate 18.0 million Ordinary Shares, exercisable at a price of 6.25 pence per new Ordinary Share (the "Market Price Options"), being the same quantum as the aggregate LTIP awarded over the past five years. The Market Price Options will vest in equal tranches after three, four and five years' further continuous employment. Previous LTIP awards were for nil cost options but subject to relative performance criteria."




Director

Number of options

Exercise price (pence)

Vesting date

Sam Moody, CEO

1,691,048

1.0

19 May 2021

3,166,666

6.25

19 May 2023

3,166,667

6.25

19 May 2024

3,166,667

6.25

19 May 2025

Stewart MacDonald, CFO

1,388,762

1.0

19 May 2021

2,833,333

6.25

19 May 2023

2,833,333

6.25

19 May 2024

2,833,334

6.25

19 May 2025

Fuddstone, how did you manage to get that so wrong!
The new options ARE precisely at 6.25p.
They mostly replace options at 1p or nil cost.
Are you seeing in some perverted sense what you want to see?
Not a recipe for grasping reality mate.

Surfit, think about it just a little, boards absolutely must take advice on these things. Have to. No other way. Maintains independence, objectivity etc. Not quite a legal requirement but that would always, absolutely always, be the advice.
You'd be first to complain otherwise. Sure you don't really want to box yourself into that position but that's where you'll find yourself!

Very pleased to see replacement of the LTIPs with a new schemes that has a 6.25p subscribe price instead of 1p.
Alignment with shareholders is what this is all about.
Also, fwiw, restating expectation of OM award.
FIG is now the only person at the party, or indeed any party, with a completely unchanged current position ... for now!
Let's see, all to at for.

... that was 'all to play for'