Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
I spend 95% of my checking in on investments time on Hemogenyx, which probably represents 8% of what I have tied up. However, that's because the Hemogenyx decision rests squarely with me. It's my choice and responsibility for the outcome rests with me. I would not be here if I thought it was a bad decision - it's just that risk / reward thing that is far too hairy at times. However, if it comes off, this 8% will become the 95% + and the pot will have grown exponentially.
What keeps me going is the science, the posters and the belief that if Dr Sandler wishes to get ample financial reward then, likewise, so will I. So for me it's a stay! GLA & keep the faith and the resolve & hurry up Hemo for f.....s....
I would not surprise me if Prevail upped their investment. Rather like a director buy but in this case a partner purchase. Certainly if they are seeing more potential applications and the prospective investor base widening. GLA
With these significant new RNS announcements of CBR's wider applications this ought to generate much broader investor appeal. Good also to see that this has all been brought to the attention of the market firmly under the banner of Hemogenyx. A great Monday. GLA
An investor in Hemo is like a marriage:
"I take you, Hemo ,to be my investment, to have and to hold from this day forward, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer , in sickness and in health, to love and to cherish, until death do us part. This is my solemn vow"
Although when we hit double figure SP I'm divorcing the effer!
GLA
Err, I am not. Read responses fully. However, there is more than just Car T that could be RNS'd before Car T IND. Eg: investment deals, don't forget Prevail went public BEFORE Lentviral success; licensing deals; CBR and so on. Many poster have commented on the many opportunities already. Your presence here is somewhat flawed in that if you are dealing with Hemo "truth" you cannot do anything on here except scathe everyone else's thoughts, ideas, speculations etc to the detriment of the share itself. Truth, unlike belief, is about what we know has happened and that is the easy call. Can you offer comment on anything like the company prospects that haven't already happened. Is it not what speculators do!
HT No but I definitely could have predicted you commenting on it today just surprised it took so long. For the "truth"of it, I did not actually state it as a prediction but that it was a good day statistically to get one. However, using your rigid yardstick for RNS announcements, news could come today and be announced today. Perhaps a brand name change to Hemoliteral, from Hemotruth, might be better since you take everything so literally. Sincerely good luck to you and all.
Https://www.statnews.com/2023/11/20/fda-cell-gene-therapies-biologics-evaluation-accelerated-approval/
Interesting article from Monday regarding accelerated approvals by the FDA. Last section particularly positive but clear the FDA have a lot on. However it seems that oncology therapies fair much better in terms of accelerated approvals. Note that Hemo have an agreed plan with FDA lentivirus splitting is resolved so the FDA, in my humble view are unlikely to let Car T, an approach they know, to sit on their to do list for long. GLA
Appreciate that HT. But, with Monday being the highest RNS date (for rough and ready arguments sake) I do not think that means that news came on Monday but perhaps Thursday or Friday the previous week. Therefore, it is reasonable to posture that an RNS prepared on a Monday could reasonably land a day later, or two depending on when the prior event takes place.
RNS's are invariably early AM, so must be from news a day or event two from event occurring. Your assumption about how news is managed is just too rigid and I am sure companies string the preparation of an RNS at least a little to maximise market and trading impact. But really HT, I am just passing a little time here. GLA
Of the last 22 product-related RNS's these are the stats:
Monday x 8
Tues x 1
Wed x 7
Thu x 4
Fri x 3
Wednesday quickly catching up with Monday as the chosen RNS date by virtue of 11/10/23 RNS. A CBR update perhaps; A Prevail type deal on the back of lentivirus success; FDA submission news; FDA good to go message. Just taking the FOMO heat off Dhub GLA
JHFH glad no locus about...we don't want the environmental health poster back on here. I agree with you I think the FDA will expedite the resubmission swiftly. They have seen the plan and know exactly what they want implemented to satisfy them. They won't linger ..30 days is a limit not a specific requirement that they take 30 days. They simply could not function as an administration sitting on approvals for 30 days in every case. Furthermore, if they get a resubmission and conversations rake place and they get indications of a swift response..why do an RNS ..just wait the extra days and wait for CH lift. My opinion only. GLA
If people cannot recognise a myrthful interpretation of some of the arguments that ensue on this board then I despair. I guess some people don't get satire. JHFH I am surprised you felt the need to explain your 3 days, did you really think I didn't know that. You should not feel the need to come back on "everything"...least of all obvious fantasy. Thought you would have recognised the Stu character challenging the 3 day proposition.
Micky you might look up satire before explaining the origins of earth and deitys...seriously! I won't be thinking on that for sure.
I guess there are people who could find an argument in an empty room.
Oh dear oh dear.
JHFH - can you indicate what facts have led you to the assumption that there are 3 non-trading days. We deal with fact on here and none of us know exactly when trading days are likely to land. You don't know any more than the rest of us. For balance there could be a plague of locus at the weekend and there may be no trading days next week. Only God knows what will happen and he or she (for balance) is not telling anyone. God has been very quiet on X (formerly Twitter) so, stop ramping 3 days it's just guess work on your part. Trading days will come when they come - speculation about trading days is meaningless. In the end God will decide when and he will punish the shorters and traders of this life-saving company. Is it life-saving (don't start on that one!!? Only God knows that and what will be. Whatever God delivers, whether it's in 2 or 3 weeks or in 2024 it does not matter, he will deliver, his plan has been accepted.
A slightly satirical look at this week's debate. Roll on next week! Is it roll on or might it be roll off (don't start on that one! GLA