Member Info for ChirpyCheep

Nice touch.

https://x.com/search?q=%2380m&src=typed_query&f=live

Thanks Ashton, just waiting for a certain incumbent to post Road to Hell aa a more appropriate song. !

Https://uk.news.yahoo.com/trump-names-jeff-landry-special-035257276.html

I wonder if there are links from PELI to Louisiana to Landry or just coincidence.

Exactly, you use the word "significant."

That's my point they won't have a "significant " exposure to 80M.

Surely 80M are too small a company to hedge/short- and too risky. ?

I have no firm view on the TR1, it's not significant.

My best guess and it's a guess is that it's simply reflects primarily clients who took part in the recent raise.Spreadex are an irrelevance.

PS, you keep referring me to being an ex IFA. To me that's irrelevant. I don't purport to have the knowledge of people like yourself , Ashton and IvR for instance.

However, with your point about the role of an IFA can I poiitely point out that I was also IMC qualified-a sufficient enough title to trade as a Stockbroker

Spreadex, pull the other one.

What's the chances they've many clients with positions in 80M.Zilch.

Little piece of news.

https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/874557922/rubenstein-public-relations-announces-new-client-partnership-with-greenland-energy-company

Thanks Ashton.

More pertinently, perhaps ,your post is a gentle reminder of RM's skin in the game.

Sorry, prove that I am genuine.

I don't have as much time as you!

It's easy to post under the cloak of anonymity.

I am willing to post my personal details via platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn etc.

I am willing to do this because I believe it will that I am genuine.

It will confirm that I am ex IFA , as stated before, but a retail investor with no link to 80M.

Are you happy to do the same ?

I expect a gutless reply; happy to be proven wrong.

Https://theenergyrepublic.com/greenland-holds-13-billion-barrels-proven-oil-reserves-with-genetic-link-to-north-sea-robert-price-president-march-gl-company/

We'all pick out different bits but for me the most salient point is that they are spending $70m on the two wells. RM quoted $30m.

Seems confident they will get the IPO away.

Cf Met1 !!

Anyone know what RM said to the FT ?

https://x.com/80milePLC/status/1995793838443499904

Thanks for your reply IvR- your posts are always well laid out. As regards another incumbents note about Placings absolute drivel IMO a couple of reasons .Management don't have the normal ability to trade so it's only reasonable that they should have a discount to compensate and more importantly the share price almost always fails to the Placing price so that anybody else can buy at the same terms. Most people want Management to put capital into a business even at a discount except a certain incumbent on here.

All a bit confusing to me

Perhaps a few of you can enlighten me please; IvR as I've always said you tend to have a good handle on these things so your views especially would be appreciated.

A few questions:

Robert Price; is he the main man now. He's got a finger in the three main pies and his association with RM goes back to the original tender with JL. He lost that tender and looks like he had his eyes on it for a long time.

I know Ashton thinks a merger is on the cards but if RP is so keen to get his hands on 80M's assets why hasn't he tried before. ?He could have picked it up for a song and nobody would/ could have stopped him. This is especially pertinent as 80M is also listed in the US, where RP is based.Just seems a circuitous route ?

RM, did he need to join the board of GE.?JL is just one project, he's got his finger in at least a dozen other pies.What's he up to. ?

A merger with GE, is it on the cards and would it be beneficial to 80M.? I guess we need to see how the listing of GE goes.If it goes well one would think it would become more likely and more beneficial. One would also think they woukd need to offer a sizeable premium if the value of 80M's JL is a lot lower then GE's.

I am completely bamboozled by the last paragraph of the Nov 13th RNS; Lastly, the Company also advises Pelican, March or USFM in future raise additional capital investments by employees shareholders conteactors and directors of 80M may or may not occur should the opportunity arise. What on earth does that mean? Why put it in ?

I don't think Rach understands the word notional in a financial context.Its notional because no money is exchanged.

Ashton, your perogative of course to reply to Rach about Olga.

Not sure, personally, that it deserved a response; is it really that important ?

However, I am glad you added that slide because it shows the deadwood that RM has eradicated; that's a weightier point.

Cerain incumbents may disagree but the organisation is much more fit for purpose since RM's re-entrance.

Looking at that slide it's hardly surprising that the make up of this BB, is as it is.

Ashton

Couldn't agree more.

I thought your earlier posts on a merger/takeover fanciful; happy to now accept your view. You look more right than I was.

RP seems to be the main man now as he is the guy who can raise the finance.

I can see why ES went; HV JL & Disko are all sorted for now, what does he have left ? Does some credence though to the Disko JV

"writing on the wall " appears pejorative to me, or have I misinterpreted the tone of your post ?

RM has recognised and even stated that there is no appetite for Greenland mining in the UK, so lets vicariously get the US involved where we think there will be an appetite.

If GE get the IPO away this debate will only intensify and that to me will be a good thing

SHE is not invested

Https://x.com/search?q=%2380m&src=typed_query&f=live

Simple salient point.

Thank you Ashton.

I am not sure why that text was included in the article, So what if 80M are talking to the US governement; they have given backing to the CML project and have underpinned their share price.

For me the most salient point is that it backs up RM's contention that it is Greenlands most imortant project, not only because of the scale but because of the speed it can deliver benefits.