Member Info for ChirpyCheep

Rach

White Elephant is my interpretation of your posts on Disko.......... and lets be honest there has been quite a few for me to make my judgement.

Thank you for your reply though.

Rach

I owe you an apology. When I asked Ashton if he knew why USFM could move where K feared to tread I should have asked the other heavyweight on here or put it to the whole board. Ashton, my apologies I've set you up like a kipper because some on here think you are a troll- I don;t incidentally.

So to undo my wrong do you mind answering a question.

You have repeatedly expressed the opinion that K binned Disko purely on economic terms. You've never used the term but you've consistentlt said it's a White Elephant.

If K walked away from Disko solely on the grounds of economics it stands to reason that USFM are moving forward if not solely but primarily economic reasons.

You like the word balance, so in the interesrs of balance can you please provide your thoughts to why USFM think Disko is economically viable wheras K didn't.

Thank you.

STN, thank you for your reply.

I was aware that K are African focused, Zambia, but the simple fact is that nobody knows why K binned Disko.

As the commentator said it could have been a question of economics, but as you say it may have been strategy.

I was just asking Ashton if he had any meat on the bones re why USFM were prepared to make such a commitment wheras K weren't.

Rach

You've twisted that one, which therefore undermines your whole post.

I did not question Aston's bullish assertions; I do not have the knowledge to do so.

Moreover, it wasn't Ashton who said Disko was uneconomic; it was one of the commentators on the podcast who said so.

Peronally I would guess that commentator was making a rash judgement because as far as I'm aware I haven't seen any figures to suggest either way.

There could be a whole host of reasons why USFM want to tread where K don't. I was just asking Ashton if he knew of any.

I asked a question. I did not question. Same word but very different meanings.

Ashton, the podcast stated that Kobold walked away because the numbers didn't stack up.

Any ideas why USFM think they do ?

Oops, my apologies.

Thank you for correcting.

.................and 80M is actually listed in the US. AMRQ aren't.

Am I missing something here.

I'm a great big 80M bull.

However, what on earth does Rare Earths have to do with 80M

I appreciate 80M does have some exposure but if you're looking to invest in those metals 80M will hardly come top of that list.

Moreover, I was listening to Tony Sage recently and he said that market is going to go pop. As per the Litium there will soon be too many players for that market.

Perhaps somebpdy can enlighten me.

Perhaps

Rach

Nobody can query the quality of your posts.

Your last one gives me great confidence brcause you have said that judging by the price of PELI you expect the listing to vomplete.

If it completes with a price anywhere near the current NAV I will be delighted because I think this will add meaningful value to 80M

So thank you.

Banz- the last point has some validity.

Not sure everbody on here wants 80M to do well though.

Rach

Fair point re the Warrants.

We both have posted about Met1 and we both have been proven conclusively correct.

However, I don't think Met1 are a fair comparison. We can both remember that they had an unblelievable amout of warrants , far more than 80M

I make the point that it's not a fair comparison because of the quality of assets.

Met1 is built on sand, what have they got ?

I don't think one can say that about 80M , the assets are world class.

All IMHO, as you say.

First post of Rach's I've ever recommended.

TP, I thought it was only a partial shutdown and most of the government is still running ?

Ashton

Personally, I don't think this is a good stock for that strategy.

Far too volatile and the risk is that one ends up with too great exposure and a stomach that doesn't match that exposure.-and a panic sell

One is also exposed to risk factors that are hard to predict eg fraud, legislation etc.

It may look like a traders dream but IMO just trade on the longer term fundamentals.

If you like the averaging down/ averaging strategy choose a Collective.

Rach

Nobody has doubted you are smart.

Price goes down and it's well I did point out the red flags, price goes up and it's a spike, Heads I win, tails I win too.

I can't remember the exact details but I did seem to remember you predicting a Placing at 0.2 p ish.

So my question to you please, is what price does 80M have to rise to for you and for how long for you to see real progress than a spike.

Please don't.

Just de-bases the BB.

Increases the traffic, making it harder to find a decent post.

Ashton, I'm with Rach on this one.

I noticed it in the presentation and thought about making the same point; however my incredulity took over.

Why on earth would they not release an RNS about this ?

Ashton

You haven't mentioned Finland ?

Looking at the new Presentation it doesn't look like the BOD regard them as insignificant.

The presentation says the licenses are in good standing............ does this imply they want to move the projects forward themselves ?

Last trade is a UT of £25.k

Anybody know why such a large UT would happen, please usually miniscule ?

Thank you, that would be good to find out about Thunderstone.

One small point; projects do have value without licenses.