Member Info for ChirpyCheep

I think I might drop the BOD a line to ask them to increase their communications , which incidentally cost money, for the sole reason of assuaging your hatred.

It might provide relief to shareholders who read this BB.

Rach, thank you for your reply.

Has made me laugh.

I've got my answer.

A few trades from 15.39 onwards.

Rach is back in

Rach

You have stated on a number of occasions that you have made money trading this share. So do you have a price target that will trigger your trading ? You espouse honesty and transparency so will you be happy to advise us if you do invest again, obviously without disclosing your holding which you seem are loathe to do.

I don't think it unfair to say you are a regular poster on here and moreover a lot of those posts are lengthy; your motives, you have advised is to help prevent fellow investors losing money. In this context are you able to advise of any other companies that may be worth considering.

Just google North Pole 20 degrees hotter, all over the news.

As I said general chit chat.

Provides a following headwind for 80M but no more than that.

Ben, can't argue with a lot with ehat you are saying............ but things can change quickly.

Bit of chit chat........ I did say the Green Revolution might not come quick enough for 80M.......... but this has been on the news today, astonishing.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38417198#:~:text=Temperatures%20at%20the%20North%20Pole%20could%20be%20up,region%20are%20directly%20linked%20to%20man-made%20climate%20change.

Ashton, do you know why this hasn't moved forward ?

The last RNS on it was pretty positive.

One could argue that pre Greenswitch this was the quickest route to cash, assuming Dundas is uneconomic.

RE certainly believed it was the quickest route to a mine.

Totally understand your points.

Buying Greenswitch is a brave move but they are trying to think outside the box. Looks to me they don't see value in selling much of their asset base and see it a way to ride out the crisis. I agree the green revolution isn't going to come quick enough for 80M but I do think the BOD know this.

I'll ask Ashton this; is their any chance that Thunderstone or Kanga will come alive as they are backed up by here and now commodities like Au, Ag, Zn

Its the same as the two shoe salesman who goes to China.

One is down because they don't wear shoes. one is ecstatic because they don't.

Correct me if I am wrong but the emphasis from Greenswitch early doors is on Biofuels, ESO & Glycerine,

How much of the overall portfolio and share price is driven by Hydrogen, I'd suggest zilch.

So therefore , sorry, I m not sure how relevant your post is, save your point that you want to exit which is your perogative.

Ouch

Makes 80M recent acquisitions look more attractive as the discount was significantally less.

Ashton, it maybe noteworthy that Howard Lutnik is the nominee for Secretary of State.

His firm Cantor Fitzgerald has a direct interest in Greenland through Critical Metals Corp.

LWHL, not me although I readily admit I don't knw as much as some of you on here.

I think it could be argued that it's one of the least attractive propsitions simply because of the market for Nickel and therefiore the cost of capital

80M also have projects more advanced eg Hammashalati, quite why they are not advancing that anyone ? Wouldn't take much for it to become a mine.

JL is my favourite , and I've said that for a bit so probably wrong, and this press release from PuIsar Helium I think is positive news for 80M

https://www.sharesmagazine.co.uk/news/market/LSE20250130070004_5519326/pulsar-provides-update-on-tunu-project-greenland.

Ashton, can 80M " piggy back" this information ? and does the positive noises from PH about Tunu help the JL cause ?

Https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9d5jwvw9nlo

That was a purely arbitrary figures; my ego is not big enough to even hazard a guess.

Ashton

Would it not be logical to assume that the reason that we are awaiting the new JV is that one of the partners won't stump up the cash ?

If say the drilling costs say $5m and both partners agree 50%, which was intimated in that RNS why would you require a new JV ?

PS, thank you for your posts again.

This is another one, quite a balanced one methinks.

https://mine.nridigital.com/mine_feb25/greenlands-promise-is-it-the-mineral-haven-trump-believes

Simples; am error. Probably manually entered. A sell that's helped bring the price down.

Agreed, it's hard to work it all out out eg Thunderstone is right on the doorstep of AMRQ and Gold is up 35% over the year. The average layman like me must think it has some realisable value.

If we are being optimistic we can hope that ES and RM are simply holding their nerve until the market for such assets improve.

Ashton, just a further point on this.

I had an email conversation with ES sometome ago , I don't have many with him and I am not pretending I have his ear

However, he did make the point that a very common criticism of 80M of having too many assets will be less visible if they become cash generative.

Ashton, in theory sounds like a good idea.

However, didn't RM say on one of the TMS interviews that Finland is generous on what a company commitments need to be to retain licenses. ie doesn't cost that much to hold

Would KoBold pay a decent enough price in a depressed market. ?

I don't know the answer but the long game would be get Greenswitch up and running and hold on to as many assets as possible.