RE: Truth of iit9 Jun 2019 09:12
Still absorbing everything and trying let it sunk in.
To date, I've not seemed to call any of it right (and am still of the view there is a very strong case against Hope on the matter of his breach of his fiduciary duties. Shows how much is open to interpretation of the presented evidence and arguments in the context of the law).
However, the declaration of solvency and all that that concretely entails - or that we believe it does - suggests we have effectively what we need now to move on. Doesn't mean that FRR can come out to issue a statement or release news. Everything remains sensitive and I'm personally not expecting such comms until they are proper ready. But if the declaration is accepted, and can't see how it can't be, then what we've been doing in the field, all that progress we've not heard about (or at least some material proportion of it), must have to be declared as evidence of solvency, I would've thought. What's left is whether we pursue further for damages - there seems to be that point about our posting for claims, which the judge mentions (can't remember the exact language and not sure if this has changed since, if anyone else can clarify?).
Not sure from this point if it's a case of we have nothing to lose by pursuing further in the courts or whether there now no point whatsoever. But if we've dealt with the supposed default, then we are possibly able to move on. Though what happens next over what time frame, not sure. But a relist following some reorganisation and comms when they are ready in the coming months seems reasonable.
Thanks to the regulars here. They know who they are. Ruddy good people.