Member Info for CaptainSwag

How much cash will be spaffed before profitability ?

Thing is that it is primer design who has the monkey pox test.

Is lr really interested in primer design or just as useless as the others ?

Saint - i don't think ncyt reputation in a scientific sense is tarnished. he products still look good

they have just been run so badly.

you had a company holding almost £100m in cash with someone (Salad man) who never had been a CEO - for a year. when they needed to move forward post covid

LR seemed a good choice as knows ygen or should know. i don't understand why there is not a coherent tangible plan now that he has all the cash he needs.

i really believed monkey pox should have been a gift for ncyt. however the sales team seems to be another just spending all day on linkedin rather than getting out there.

going to be interesting to watch the presentation and how they fudge things

This was the killer

"We are working on a comprehensive growth strategy for the combined Group and look forward to further updating the market with more details in H1 2025."

LR has been in charge for 5 months now...still no plan?

SP just going to drift down from here.

very disappointed but i guess to be expected from another aim lifestyle company with poor management, poor sales team, too high a head count etc etc

No indication of being able to cash in on monkey pox..ffs

Tbh it just sounds like the usual linkedin kind of comments.

You are amazing...blah ..blah

And let's be honest the bar has hardly been set high....

I wonder if "abracadabra" is still buying cnsl shares..lol

Cnsl claimed at one stage to be supplying over 100 countries. If that were the case then they are generally very small contracts or amounts.

They will be getting new contracts..just as they will probably lose some.

Last year was yet another loss making year.

The prediction for this year was not great.

So until we see an rns with substantial contract a

...I won't be getting too excited.

The issue as always is that the science is against the product.

Caveat emptor

I said all along that I believed they would have to pay back hard earned tax payer money that they were not entitled to.

Faye...it will go down in cnsl history along with such other classic porkers

" Busy busy busy"

" Big things coming"

When it turns out the machines were the equivalent of a cycle machine in most homes

And " we don't need to place" followed by an rns 2 days later " we can confirm speculation in the press that we are approaching parties for a placing"

I am afraid the ferry is just down to one man's ego.

I thought at the time..wtf..was bizarre and risky.

Little did I know that it would be the straw that broke the camels back

How to tell everyone you were sacked without telling them you were sacked?

Faye...don't worry you will get used to suggestions ( often in the form of questions) that have nothing to do with cnsl and making any money from their contentious product

The bickering only comes from one side . I believe it is because a) they want to spam the board to hide any critical posts and b) want to engage on the board through loneliness and therefore getting into an argument is the easiest way.

Faye...they could release unlimited tests

Tests to tell you that you are tired?

Tests to tell you that you are hungry?

As you said tests to tell you that you are stupid ?

I am sure people can tell if they are stressed without the need to pay a ton for a test

Thanks.

Crazy that you can vote electronically but not be "seen" for an egm

Egm - if the requestors did not have paper certs then surely you would just need a screenshot of any holdings account or letter confirming holding?

I do blame JW ...the ferry was the straw that broke the camels back ...and he said he had alternative financial packages possible which was clearly a lie.

Hard to know whats what with aussie billonaire - it was in newspaper but then he did go very quiet.

Yes downs is experienced at what he does....he was called in to do a specific job and he has done it.

Doesn't mean it was handled right ...or the best option.

It was the option that best suited riverstone

Broomtree - the suspicion arises because there has been no transparency since he came on board.

i understand JW goin.as part of the extra finance deal - but the other directors going meant that there was no accountability - he was in control of a company not voted in by share holders.

he didnt communicate anything to us - we had to hear about things in the press - when we should have had an RNS

he avoided answering about the aussie billionaire and it seems an EGM was actually requested

surely that should have been RNS? and shareholders allowed to vote on it?

Stokey - i noted that

i think that it was clear that he came in with only intention - to sell off assets either as a whole or break up.

that is what he does and why he was brought in

he didnt answer satisfactorily on convertible loans..possible shareholder equity or why assets not sold to keep belfast going and maintain navy contract

i suspect they will sell at a price to get riverstone debt back and no more.

meanwhile someone picks up £700m navy contract and IM for cheap