Member Info for buried_treasure

"BTC Fear and Greed Index" LOL

Was waiting for fireworks.

All he got was a fire at a battery crushing shed in Wolverhampton.

Where's rylidan?

Disappeared, never to be seen again. I think he had an average about double where we are now.

He was warned this was a bubble, only waiting for the froth to come off before collapsing, but he wouldn't listen.

I wonder if he's worked out who has his money yet?

Yeah, whatever you say fellas. Mr Market clearly thinks that's complete and utter cobblers.

Ok, you asked for it.

This has no potential to go into orbit. None whatsoever.

It is a complete busted flush, in debt to the gunwales with nothing to show for it other than a shed in Wolverhampton crushing dead batteries and selling the resulting safe waste product. Director salaries of £50k a month still accrued last seen.

That article is just yada yada, and if the company paid someone to write it rather than copying and pasting from somewhere else, it should demand its money back.

A significant difference between Main Market and AIM is on AIM all announcements must be approved by an independent Nominated Adviser (NOMAD) who is supposedly on the hook for what is said, whereas Main Market announcements only need approval from directors (insiders).

On that basis alone you can see the attraction of the Main Market for grifters.

Brace yourself, Hamilton. You aren't going to know what hit you sometime in the next few weeks.

Tick tock.

That sounds really serious Bengot.

You'd better report that to the FCA.

The link is at the bottom of the "post message" page.

(Happy to stand by every post I've made on here. Especially the ones where I school mugs like you.)

Congratulations CHUMP. You've finally found the relevant part. You've misinterpreted it to suit your flawed assertions, but you're a complete mug riddled with rose tinted confirmation bias so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised.

We all find out in two short months when the annual report is published.

Sooner if the company were to comment because of the recent rise. But there may be a good reason why they can't do that. I think even you might be able to work out on your own what that might be.

"For anyone else reading this what Buried Treasure is saying is absolute tosh." - 3 recommendations.

In the red corner - a low IQ daddy's boy from the provinces who manages to download last year's rules from the internet and misinterpret them.

In the blue corner - someone who has been thumbing the Yellow Book since before big bang and has seen more grifters find more ways to circumvent the rules than his adversary has had hot dinners.

Whatever.

CHUMP

So you admit you got it wrong. And despite me leading you almost all the way to where you need to look, you STILL get it wrong!

I really am going to have to spell this out for you, aren't I?

Have a look at UKLR 7.1.6 (2) a.

Now, as a company which has as its stated business buying, developing on and selling exploration assets...... No, I simply can't be bothered with educating you for free any more. But please, tell whoever on the telegram group is making you look chumpish to pipe down.

CHUMP

I don’t know who is feeding you the guff you’re spouting as gospel in a doomed attempt to lend yourself a shred of credibility, but after you’ve finished the accounting course, the company law course and the corporate finance course (see exchanges passim) you may like to take yet another course (they’re queuing up, aren’t they?) on the FCA Handbook, making sure you turn up for the weeks when the Listing Rules are discussed – although you could also do with a lecture or two on the Prospectus and Disclosure side of things.

Sorry to have to hand you you’re a**e on a plate for the umpteenth time, but there is no such thing as a ‘class 2 transaction’ any more. You’re at least a year out of date on that old fruit.

So, looking at the CURRENT rules, you know, the ones like in force TODAY, thinking really hard (stick your tongue out or suck your crayon if you like), can you see which provision of those rules the company might be relying on NOT to disclose what it may have done?

Or would you like me to explain with pictures?

This lot have proved so many times with abuses of the Prospectus Rules and Listing Rules (all reported to the Regulator by yours truly) that they believe rules are for little people.

And what if they sold their CRML holding in tranches of 9%?

Hope springs eternal in Mugsville. The lifestyle grifters depend on it.

They wouldn't be lining you up for 33% dilution if there was anyone else to foot the salary bill.

"Priced to fail" according to one commentator formerly flavour of the month here. Still circling the plughole, and I suspect ran out of CRML shares to keep the show going a while ago, hence the need for placing headroom.

No prospectus, naturally. So another backdoor director issue no doubt.

Well well well. The email and phone has been red hot this afternoon. Seems we've got a right old stink blowing up here.

Pass the popcorn.

I gather for once the regulator is all over this.

Quite right too. The most blatant this year by a mile.

You can't short this junk. Nobody serious is into one way bets.

PompeyM is utterly shameless.

Anyone buying here is a complete mug who deserves all they get.

I don't think PompeyM will be back after this debacle. Pumped with a number of nothingburger RNSs, and as soon as the bid goes 20% above par... WHAMMO! Forward sold discounted placing at par.

The best bit is it still ain't funded to drill! £1m will pay some patient creditors and keep the lights on for a few more months, then rinse and repeat.

You can't say you weren't warned. Anyone continuing to hold is a total mug who deserves all they get.

For financial masochists only.

PKF Littlejohn... auditor to all sorts of merde up the stagnant end of the London market.

The only bigger red flag would be Johnsons who will literally act for anyone with the means to pay. And, as it sometimes turns out, a fair few who don't.