Member Info for buried_treasure

You are priceless Dusty.

CRML up : this is it!

Indeed Buster.

There's a reason why Private Eye calls it the Fundamentally Complicit Authority.

As with all single share telegram groups, they died of confirmation bias and were buried up their own a**es.

"Beware of who you trust"

Indeed, but to be fair it was done in plain sight. There's nothing playing out that wasn't in the Prospectus, and entirely predictable.

The only mystery to me was why some big clever people bought newly minted shares at a multiple of NAV.

And how anyone buying for the first time today is still doing the same.

It's an investment company. It should trade at a slight discount to NAV. That's it.

Dvh

I know. And with his track record, you utter mug.

"Echo chamber secure, Cap'n!"

Dvh

TEN YEARS of delays and you "assume no delays"?

Mate, that is the definition of mug.

Trougher can't be doing another smash and grab, can he?

Can he?

That chart over the last few days, and especially hours, is tingling all the spidey senses...

Well well, isn't that an interesting development?

That takes the "not the RNS we were hoping for" count to 857.

Even money the fat troughing Aussie grifter gets it to 1,000 before he toddles off to his dotage in Cyprus.

If he drops a raise at 0.8p on you off the back of this froth I don't think I'd ever stop laughing.

Patxaran

I think you need to join a single share telegram group if all you want is bullish confirmation bias posting.

This is a bulletin board, for both bull and bear discussion. Some of us here have memories that go back a lot longer than St Sath's involvement, so forgive me if I'm a little more cynical rather than just lapping up the jam tomorrow ra-ra.

When it is announced that the company has drawn down £1M from the CLN facility and bought bitcoin, i.e. it has done what it said it would do in RNS some time ago, then I might start to believe the hype.

Until then, the "raise" is future tense for me at least.

I suspect several more than you.

And, er, I thought I was filtered?

"Echo chamber secure, Captain..."

40 years in Corporate Finance perfecting my Dunning-Kruger credentials. Yeah, right-o mate.

Fill your boots then mate.

Just don't come crying when it blows up in your face.

"A facility committed is a facility raised"

What nonsense indeed.

We'll see.

Don't worry 'bud', I know this ticker of old.

Temporary Mountain Use Permits anyone?

And it's never different this time. Different grifters, same old shafting for PIs.

I commented elsewhere where this has been cross-ramped as follows :

"When you say "raised" £2m at a conversion price of 2p, you imply that the "raise" has happened.

Call me an old cynic but when reading the latest RNS I get the distinct impression that while the company may have signed an Investment Agreement, it has yet to draw down and receive any cash, making the "raise" somewhat future tense.

I'm sure this is only a matter of semantics and that the cash will be requested, received and deployed by the company. But I'm not sure I'd buy at least until I knew that it had and could treat "raised £2m" as definitively past tense.

Put another way, I've seen mugs spoofed like this before."

When you say "raised" £2m at a conversion price of 2p, you imply that the "raise" has happened.

Call me an old cynic but when reading the latest RNS I get the distinct impression that while the company may have signed an Investment Agreement, it has yet to draw down and receive any cash, making the "raise" somewhat future tense.

I'm sure this is only a matter of semantics and that the cash will be requested, received and deployed by the company. But I'm not sure I'd buy at least until I knew that it had and could treat "raised £2m" as definitively past tense.

Put another way, I've seen mugs spoofed like this before.

BMV has a long and storied history on the public markets of forecasting one thing and doing another, or nothing at all.

Did somebody mention 'Temporary Mountain Use Permits'?

No doubt the cross-rampers will say it's different this time. I'll believe it when I see it. It rarely is different this time.

Different set of grifters maybe, but same old result for mug PIs.