RE: PANR....23 Apr 2025 18:23
I think it was OK, the part of the presentation that dealt with why Topset-1 failed was very technical ( at least to me) but that is what it is and I can not blame Max & David for that, what was great to hear was why the data gained from Topset-1 has enabled recalibration of the other horizons to be tested and that has been positive.
Good to hear Max outline logging tools used and give a logical explanation why the deviated well meant an RFT tool was not used.
As for pumping equipment I think the original testing RNS did state that the lower zone timetable would be contingent on equipment availability but as I think DAVID said we are on a GRAVEL PAD so a lot less time critical and of course we do not want to pay a premium if we can avoid it.
As for presentation slickness, think the Q & A process means there will be a lot of jumping around, it just is what it is.
Will look a video once available.