RE: Lumberton27 Mar 2019 12:11
Sadly, it's not the good news I was hoping for. It does of course clarify that they have now acquired the site but this was a pretty much forgone conclusion. There was little to no chance that the site wouldn't be approved. It is good news in that it was slightly earlier than I expected.
However, my concern is that the RNS doesn't mention anything about the actual decommissioning of the Utah plant either having been completed or even started.
In a previous post I gave my outline timescale and mentioned that IF AEG where 'Proactive' they would already be decommissioning the Utah plant in readiness for transportation as they would have known themselves that the site acquisition was a certainty.
This RNS doesn't mention any 'timeline' nor the decommissioned status of the Utah plant.
So, at present my concern is that the AEG BOD have been sitting on their hands in a 'Reactive' state - rather than pushing ahead to bring the Revenue-generating timescales of the Lumberton site closer.
Hopefully, AEG will take up one of the suggestions I sent them via their email contact page to produce videos and pictures of the Utah Plant progress (similar to how Sirius Minerals provides such progress).
So, if the AEG Board does happen to look at this board, then please think about videos etc to give us shareholders some insight to your more 'Proactive' nature and capabilities please.