Member Info for bottom_feeder

Please copy entire message and add your predicted "Date (SP)" for each target listed at bottom of message :-)

Username.....TGT1................TGT2..................TGT 3
Bottom_F.... 23/05(1.8p)......27/05(2.1p).......30/05(2.4p)
Donek..........tbd(2.2p)..........tbd(3p)...............tbd(5p)
TT.................tbd(2.2p)..........tbd(3.3p)............tbd( 6.9p)

So here's the 3 targets:-

TGT 1: All components connected own site and ready for final testing (pressure etc).
TGT 2: All rig testing completed successfully meaning system ready for initial gas flow testing (not delivery)
TGT 3: First Gas delivery (meaning gas that will begin to generate income)

Donek: If we get SP=5p for TGT 3 (regardless of actual date) I'll be a happy chappy :-) :-)

I reckon I might get shot down for my End of May prediction for first revenue generation gas delivery.... but i'm hoping that ANGS are looking to play a card up their sleeve by actually beating delivery expectations slightly (day or two) ahead of the month end :-)

TGT 1 is the real decider as the other targets should realistically flow from that point with some level of consistency.

I know everyone has their own thoughts on SP ranges, deliveries, etc but I thought I'd post a "Scoreboard" message where everyone can give their 'predictions' on 3 fundamental short-term targets that should have a realistic, real impact on SP rise. It would be nice if the Trolls, spammers etc didn't fill this up with rubbish and any discussions should be left to other message threads as I just want to get a 'table' of ideas rather than a smuggers-board.

So here's the 3 targets:-

TGT 1: All components connected own site and ready for final testing (pressure etc).
TGT 2: All rig testing completed successfully meaning system ready for initial gas flow testing (not delivery)
TGT 3: First Gas delivery (meaning gas that will begin to generate income)

Username TGT 1 TGT 2 TGT 3
Bottom_F 23/05 27/05 30/05

Media attention in my view can have a detrimental effect too. I would rather ANGS simply announce first gas and flow rates to the financial market.

The problem in being overly publicised is that it increases ANGS' "attraction" to undersirable parties such as environmental groups and even foreign oligarchs such as Psycho Putin (PP).

Given PP' psycho propensity for inacting subversive attacks there's always the possibilty that Saltfleetby becomes a 'target'.

So I hope the government and security forces are paying special attention to the site.

Just my opinion of course..... but if I were a mad, psycho Oligarch I know what I'd be doing :-(

Managed to sell off my PRTC shares for a nice earning with the SP jump and given me funds to top up my ANGS holdings above 4Mill.

will be mega happy if the SP reaches my 2-3p target. Time to pray to the SP gods :-)

Well,

There is actually a "Downside" to filtering..... I didn't get to see Gideon's message that he has sold up.... even after all his ramping and 'enthusiasm'.

Still, I didn't have to read all his BS either. Thankfully there are a few decent posters on here to more than compensate.

With respect to holdings etc, I've actually used up all my current funds and sitting at over 3.5Million shares. So absolutely guttered that I can't dip in and rake up a whole barrel-load of shares at this lower price.... such as shame.

Can anyone lend me me £250k to invest with please??? I'm happy to pay back at a 20% interest...... if I can make 21%+ :-)

WOW!
Sooooo many Green bars .... it's hilarious :-)

It's becoming utterly monotonous watching the dribble on here about how gas prices have never been better, increasing etc.

And inundated with 'progress' statements about its X days left before gas, its Xdays minus 1 for gas etc.

Iit's the same old rampers and trolls (most of whom I've thankfully now filtered).

So, if you don't have anything useful to say then why don't we all simply "wait" for first gas to actually flow.

As HITS correctly states, it's an important step but nowhere near as important as the side-track.

Thank god for the filter though.

Never thought a 'Green' screen would look so good ha ha

Yet another user (aka Alias) to go on the filter list.

It's getting quite a bed of green :-)

Sounds like a very 'liberal' tolerant district council eh :-)

In that case..... should be a doddle?

Chaspb: HGV movements should be based on 2-way trip. This is on the assumption that one way will be 'empty'; i.e. the truck is either picking up or dropping off only. Hence the weight impact on road and services (underground pipework etc) infrastructure is mitigated.

So if ANGS want to push towards 100 barrels a day then they are more than doubling HGV traffic.

Given time/day restrictions this means ANGs may need to increase onsite storage but that's not a biggy. I don't know what their storage capacity is but likely needs increasing anyway if all goes well.

Porter: you're right that any company diesn't want to dirupt the area. But the fact is that if the traffic increase is too much it wilk have to be put out for locals to allow them to raise objections etc.

That is the BIG hurdle.

As I mentioned, what's needed is a quick determination of the HGV requirements and see what the reaction is.

Although lets be honest, ANGS will easily know how many barrells can be shipped per truck etc so it should be a no-brainer.

As a guideline, a local chicken breeding company in my area has spent over 2 years trying to get agreement for an increased HGV submission.

I'm just saying that the Planners have pushed the problem onto the next hurdle that's all.

But time will tell.

For Brockam what's missing... and much needed.... are ANGS statement on timescales for their HGV proposal, agreement and evaluations.

No timescales leaves it floating. But it's worth ANGs putting management time in which may be diverted too much.

I suspect we may have to wait until nearer end of May for any 'decent' news. Although ANGs should be able to establish and furnish some preliminary timescales witihn 1-2 weeks .... I'm hoping.

The Brockham "go-ahead" was a double-edged sword yanis.

HGV approval is a potentially big hurdle and won't be quick..... unless there's a little back-door play.

So it's not as good a win. Plus there will obviously be a lot of sellers 'snipping' the spike.

MNN: looks like you tip was right. I've been pushed on to Limit Orders again.... bugger!

MNN: thanks for the "placing stock" tip

The Big issue with "HGV movements" is that they can take an exceedingly long time to even get agreement. They'll have to submit numbers, routes etc all of which can allow affected parties (residents, companies, farms etc) to throw up objections (legitimate, well fiunded or otherwise).

So looks like the planners have thrown it onto the next frying pan to pass the buck so to speak.

Very clever.... (or devious)

I'd love to buy at 1.375.
But share site pushing my 1Million+ buys at 1.399.
That's just too much greed by MMs for me at present grrrrrr

.... and.....

Price monitoring has just kicked in ??????