Member Info for bottom_feeder

And there comes further Dilution :-)

Loads...Lolly: I have to disagree slightly regarding you saying it's all over if IMM don't get FDA approval.

Note that IMM still have the potentially upcoming Phase 2a/3 pivotal trial in CIDP as stated by Tim McCarthy, Chief Executive Officer, who said:

“We are delighted to be announcing this successful readout of the PK study. This is a significant
milestone for ImmuPharma and for shareholders, and recognition of the key investment thesis behind
ImmuPharma, in respect to having P140 (Lupuzor™), a late-stage Phase 3 clinical asset for the
treatment of lupus patients with a Phase 2a/3 pivotal trial in CIDP close behind.”

NigeCO: You're an absolute disagace to society. We don't OWN BT. Minority Shareholders never have 'owned' a company , it's the big majority shareholders that truly own companies.

And, we as shareholders ALSO have Moral and Ethical duties... clearly you and Fleccy are both utteerly immoral and unethical.

Hence you're both filtered so I don't havee to read your Darwenian vomit anymore.... filtered,.... bye

Fleccy: Hogwosh as usual from a short-minded person such as yourself. Still living in Darwinian times I see.

As for selling up, that's my choice 'bud'. Clearly I touched a nerve eh.

Fleccy: Your reasoning is completely flawed.

1) First and formost lets be absolutely plain about Shareholders in the likes of BT. thy (including you and I) do NOT inject funds INTO the company unless its via a share issue these days (or its a new start-up etc).

Since we are simply buying and selling these shares, we have given NO contirbution to the actual company; only to previous/future shareholders. As such, we DO NOT deserve or are guaranteed Dividends etc.

We (you, me and all other shareholders) are financially investing... that's it. We hope to make profit either via selling higher or Dividends or both.... end of.

2) ANY company only grows and makes profit as a result of the MAJORITY of the WORKFORCE.... that is an absolute given for the likes of BT. Marketing department, engineering, development, research, Customer Services etc. THe BOD makes up a miniscule portion of the company. Yes you can argue that Directors are somehow the 'heart' and powerhouse of a company but that's not actually true. They 'Direct' the workforce and make high-level decisions etc.

But the IMPLEMENTATION and clearly the success/failure of such high-level decisions fall within the remit of the other employees, including middle management.

So yes, I absolutely agree that all workers shold and are ENTITLED to SHARE in the profit of the company and to be rewarded for their contirbution.

You may not like this but..... if that means reducing Dividends then so be it. Better still, these are unprecedented times where cost of living etc is a major issue.

This is PRECISELY the time when both BOD and Shareholders have a duty to 'protect' the company by ensuring that their Workforce (the entire workforce... not just Directors) are supported. Whether that is by pay rises, share ownership, bonuses etc or combination.

I tmakes more sense (at least to me) for BT to provide that 'Essential' support than to bicker.

We as Shareholders also have a responsibility to ensure the BOD take appropriate action to ensure the success of the company, hence why I support reaching out to the BOD as an Investor and letting them know my believes.

However, if the BOD insist on makeing this into a stubborn, irresponsible fight rather than properly negotiating a fair package then I need to sell up at some point.

The BOD proclaim on their website about morales, ethics etc but are clearly failing to keep those standards (imho).

Now stepping off my Soap Box :-)

Statment regarding Patents is not correct.

Patents ONLY give the owner the 'ability' to try tp prosecute anyone who tries to copy etc without permission/license.

It also does NOT prevent anyone from creating something in a different way that has the same effect/outcome.

The Patent Rules were changed that allows anyone to submit a Patent that can be based on another Patent also. In that case the new Patent Owner needs to negotiate/agree certain licenses from the original Patent holder. However, the rules are thtat the old Patent holder CANNOT prevent the new Patent Holder from subjugating/suppressing the utilisation of the new Patent.

The rules are supposed ot STOP commercial entities from preventing new ideas, tech etc from entering the market.

As long as the New Patent is sifficiently different and/or improves upon the old Patent in some criteria (e.g. effectiveness, production/manufacturing techniques/cost, environmental impact etc) then the Patent process can review and 'potentially' accept the new Patent application.

It then becomes a VERY costly process for the old Patent holder to take action to either prevent the new Patent being formally accepted and released as well as forcing thte New Patent holder to pay up what is considered a rightful 'slice' of their profit (if any).

"So yes, without doubt, there has been a very considerable increase in value of the asset"

Don't be fooled by that statement fro ANGS/GL.

OF course the Asset value has increased, but so has the Hedge Liability; even more so now that ANGS/GL has 'slipped' some of that Hedge Liability into later Quarters.

What GL fails to provide is an actual projected profit over and above the Hedge and other financial liabilities.

So go ask him for that projected profit (taking account of ALL liabilities) and see what his response is. Glib statements like "we shall be comfortably capable of support blah blah" isn't an answer. You need ACTUAL figures and percentages.

Yep. Went below 24 so time to snap up the dregs and hold until above 28-3

Yep, might be worth getting in if goes below 24

And down she (SP) goes again).

Seems it's not the 'Bagger' everyone was shouting about eh.

No.... GL did NOT deliver on time.

On Time would have been years ago..... plonkers!

Only thing going to really affect SP is National News.

And, given the events of Ukraine, European Gas shortages etc, ANGS needs to PUSH for Coverage urgently!

Although, and here's the rub, whether the SP goes up or down doesn't actually affect GL etc. It only affects PIs really.

Nope.... no second thoughts...... reasonable RNS for once and the SP hardly even 'blips'.

So much for the "multi-bagger" trolls on here with their flights of fancy scenarios.

Not exactly difficult to be "on time for once" given GL' record. After all, buy enough Lotto Tickets and you'll 'eventually' hit a £10 win LoL

What is surprising is that....

1) THe SP hasn't risen further than it has on the news, and
2) GL couldn't even give an idea of the 'initial' FLow Rate.

It's relatively easy to predict 'potential' drop-off given the amount of data available. However, GL is either concerned the intiial Flow Rate is too low or concerned it infers a potentailly lower than desired 'stable' flow rate.

So seriously not happy that GL should deliberately choose to avoid giving any initial flow rates etc.

But, at least he's done EXACTLY what he does in RNS'..... He's left it completely OPEN as to when he may inform anyone of the Stable Flow Rates..... could be next week, next month, next year.

And don't mention the Side Track (minimum 50 days assuming no issues whatsoever) which now seems likely to not provide any additional gas until at least End October, possibly into Nov/Dec.

But, at least they managed to get gas 'flowing' at last.

Lambo222: Waffle all you like you're not going to fool anyone.... plonker! ha ha ha

Filtered!

bud stop playing the numbers. The MMs will clearly take advantage. If there's buying opportunity then good luck. But I'm already heavily invested and not willing to put anymore in..... regardless of 'potential'.

Personally, I hope it rises.....

the 'Spread' may be the same..... but the Bid - Ask isn't derrrrr

I see sooooo many green bars.... it's like we've found Troll City

Maid: Unfortunately the MMs don't see it your way. THey are punsihing the Spread at the moment and hence it's going to be a rough ride at least today.

And yes..... it is very disappointing DanSteely. IMM MUST have known there was no way they were going to get an FDA response by close of play.

Even worse is if Avion has been stalling and not passing on information to IMM about it. In that case that would be 'worrying'.

But, we can only sit and wait it out. Hopefully there won't be too big a drop as people drop out.