Big picture risk!17 Jan 2025 17:24
What Avacta are doing is attempting to disrupt an establishment industry...ie cancer, an industry in care, drugs, chemotherapy, research etc...its massive, and a lot of big players are making a fortune in just dealing with people who have the disease, as well as supporting their families and friends.
It may come as nonsensicle to some on here, but not every player in the cancer industry would like a cure, because they are raking off profits so huge that it would put a spanner in the cashcow...for them.
I read a tweet earlier that said Pfizer have been in business for 175 years, and have not cured one disease, not one, and that is because a patient cured is a customer lost!
They, and others in the health industry, do not want Avacta's type of solution to cancer, they regard it as disruptive technology that would put 'some' of their operations out of business!
Think about it, if Avacta's techology is adopted on a mass scale it would mean that anybody with any type of tumor just has a limited amount of chemo..and they're cured!
It would be a threat to the income streams of some BP departments.
If you zoom out to whats going on in the world, the likes of the WEF, the WHO and the likes of Bill Gates, they are all trying to reduce the worlds population, not cure elderly cancer patients who are a strain on pensions, and of no use to economies.
The oil industry is a good example, it is thought that many decades ago the technology was developed to run cars on water, but the oil industry was too powerful and quashed the idea using some very unscrupulous means....amoungst other forms of rejection.
My view, and I know I'm going to get hammered by the usual suspects, is that the Avacta solution to cancer will never be adopted en masse, no matter who owns it.
It would be too disruptive, to too many big players, and keep too many people alive that are of no use to Governments around the world in the 21st century.