Member Info for BoomerBower

ERM I didn't lose the argument with Mick, is your reading age 5 crow cast? And FTA etc are unecessary because tariffs are a gross act of self harm to protect rich producers. As ever crowcast you represent the rich at the expense of the poor. Quite the illiberal one you are.

Pastyc as I assume you hold no Lloyd's I assume you are basically on here heckling.

For your heckling I'd give you 1 out of 10, as it's neither funny nor clever.

They didn't create 435bn they merely diluted the money supply by this. Nothing clever about it at all and surely likely to create bubbles in our economy and encourage finance on anything and everything. Central bankers are powerful idiots, perhaps worse even than politicians.

Cc we have the most left wing chancellor and om we have had since the 70s. The tax and spent merchant Hammond is left of brown and Blair by some way. They are taxing the economy more heavily than brown or Blair ever did. Guardian readers should be in heaven in theory.

Is this like fact when you claim french unemploynent is 6.8% look, or Ur latest one on this Dutch guy. Or bring unaware of the concept if present value through gross ignorance. Cc facts are like sieve and we are here to straighten them out luckily lol.

The trouble with this share is the staff are vastly overpaid, and if we are lucky enough to make any money the staff nick it in bonuses. Cost income ratio in the mid 60s says it all.

The bonuses here are a joke. The return on their tier 1 capital is about 2.5%. Fair to say anyone could achieve that abysmal return. There is zero justification for any bonuses at all here, they are lucky to be paid a salary. And it's a joke the bonus pool is larger than the actual net profit of the bank last year. Jes is a true bellend who needs firing.

Cabbage us thecUKs moral guardian, just like the shi##y damp rag that is the guardian paper. Fit only for toilet paper that rag. For lefties getting touchy about their gospel, I don't read Mail, express or any publication since they are all full of absolute bs and are essentially printed to discourage ppl from thinking.

There was some chap who opened a big short at 50p telling us 30s were coming?? Where is he??

Looks like the global rally in stock markets is coming through here

Stage I think average Joe is perfectly capable of deciding whether we stay in the EU closed shop or not. It's pretty simple and you insult the intellect of most ppl. Ppl voted out get out. People are more sick of the tiresome bs of our self important politicians who have been shown to be lying inconpetent in hock to special protected producers interest groups.

And present value can be used to recalculate historic payments in today's value. Inflation adjusting all UK contributions dince joining they are worth 500bn in today's money. The only bullshitter here is you crowcast, you are embarassing yourself as normal because you are innumerate and have severe dyscalculia.

It's not a lie at all 500bn is the present value of all contributions to the EU. Present value is a standard technique which is used to accounts for the effects of inflation, it's used in your pension etc. Only a fool would argue that the present value of uk contributions to the EU wasn't 500bn. So the list here us you crowcast trying to deny present value something everyone on here can Google.

Yeah like those would all disappear if we leave. Get real for once.

No it wouldn't even if the other side is stupid enough to impose tariffs to their consumers it is still better to in all circumstances not impose them. Comparative advantage shows this is obvious. Our boy crowcast would think growing oranges in Scotland a great idea by spending huge capital on green houses and imposing tariffs on Spanish imports. This is the European economic model, protectionism for large inefficient producers.

Dimwit crowcast repeating the same dumb manta of the protectionist. In all cases when countries have gotten rid of tariffs more jobs are created than lost even when done on a unilateral basis. Therefore there is no argument for tariffs at all as they are merely an act of self harm perpetrated by politicians against normal ppl. And just because most countries have them doesn't mean they are good. Most countries have murderers and rapist's too, but like tariffs there is no benefit to them.

Why am I surprised you don't understand this when you don't understand a present value calculation?

Crowcast tariffs are a tax on consumers and all empiric evidence shows they destroy more jobs than they protect. They only exist because politicians don't understand trade and there are noisy large producers who enjoy bribing government for the protection. On the whole tariffs only make societies poorer, only an idiot (like Trump) would argue otherwise. Crowcast this boards trump! Is he your protectionist role model/hero?

Spedders that is rot on all levels. In all cases where tariffs are cut more jobs have been created than destroyed, no country has gotten poorer from freer trade ever. Its why in all cases protectionism has only been shown to make societies poorer and destroy more jobs than protected. It's unsurprising because rewarding inefficiency is a perverse inventive.

Close here is 165.3.

This is the trouble with politicians negotiating trade. In any case there's nothing to negotiate if you do the sane thing and drop tariffs to zero. In all cases this will create more economic activity and jobs than are lost, just noisy corporates interests don't like it.