Member Info for Bondy123

Nope, do not recall that at all, how do you explain the system being used for Exe in Europe it is not compliant?

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ce-marking

Doesn’t CE marking only apply to consumer products?

So Alt, let me get this clear, you think both Acciona and Juelich deployments will be in the latter part of the year?

As for the list, unfortunately, Alt, this still counts as something that was not delivered. For me, what's telling is the non-delivery to Juelich. Why do you think this German outfit would not take delivery when expected, for a product they knew the spec of? There is something they're not telling us about why they couldn't develop / send out the original system they ordered. Either there was an issue with it, or Adam Bond talked the S up so much they decided they didn't want it any more? Now, it looks like H2 2022?

Don't worry about my research Alt, I have all the facts about contracts, mou's and delivery record that i'm ready to debate. Despite your feeble attempts you've not even managed to succesfully argue one point off of my list of 32.

Garonne, I appreciate your candidness and honesty here. Let's hope that the groundwork has been laid in the last year and hope for the best. I am hopeful too, and there's plenty of scheduled news to look forward to in the next few weeks. ExE participation, Final results and hopefully Julich, MACE and Acciona deployment. The latter I am unsure about whether they want the ammonia or methanol system as in the liberum note it said they were waiting for.

"Spanish construction company ACCIONA and Germany based research institute Julich are commercial partners also. ACCIONA had ordered a 160KW L Series but is now discussing ordering the improved S System."

Aim - good point on the emotional posting. I'll admit to some of my posts being emotional too.

There some of the common ground I was looking for. I'm not responsible for Garonne's posting, but Garonne, I hope you'll take note of this reaosnable piece of feedback.

Absolutely Garonne. It is definitely an appropriate forum for all views. I even praised Haggis yesterday for some of his posts. I actually think deep down Alt is probably a good bloke, but I am just fed up of the controlled narrative and bully boy antics here by some people trying to drown out 'dissenting' voices.

I do think most of us want the same thing and I do hope we can get to some middle ground so we can start to have more constructive conversations like, what deals might be coming up next, how much revenue we think our manufacturing capability can handle, how much of our core market we have addressed and what the potential is and so on.

At the moment, we are just confused as to what has happened with the L product, whether it is viable, and how long it might be until that factory can start to turn orders out at scale. How much of it depends on this membrane being proven? What's going on with the membrane? We need some clarity here. It's perfectly ok to look at all the things that have fallen away in the past and wonder whether some of these are next. Perfectly reasonable, considering the sheer volume of other things that fell away since AB has been in charge.

It is ok to be an investor, really wanting the company to do well and at the same time asking questions that are relevant to the steps that will take this from a £250m mcap company to a £1-2£bn mcap company. That is my selfish want and always has been and I can't be more transparent than that.

Also, if you're one of the group that thinks comments on this BB impact the shareprice (I don't, but each to their own), then you would certainly also agree with me that reasonable communication is in Adam Bond and AFC's control and this board, and us investors would welcome some communication and things to talk about. The silence is deafening.

To Adam Bond & AFC: Give us something to discuss and clear up the confusion around product viability and time to market. We deserve this and you will need us when you need money again in the future.

'Dumbass remarks about holiday trips to Saudi for instance.'

To date, Adam Bond has achieved no sales out of his round the world expedition. I call that a jolly, or a holiday. Sorry.

'I don’t pump and I don’t dump on other investors.'

What you and your team try to do is silence people with alternative views by;

1. Being rude enough to accuse them of not being 'genuine investors'
2. Saying they are pumping or dumping without any proof
3. Creating a perception that there is a group of people doing this in co-ordination with each other to take down the stock, making an 'us good folk and them bad folk' environment
4. Picking on particular posters for their language skills, even if English isn't their first language
5. Calling genuinely concerned investors 'Con Men'
6. If someone has a change of view (as people do in life) - they are doing it because they have some kind of trade on it (which granted might be the case in some instances, but it is not true for most)
7. Ganging up on posters who dare challenge your narrative.

I could go on. I don't see Garonne, who your team has conveniently, like bullies renamed 'Garmoan' as someone who has any other intention than to see the SP increase. I appreciate his counter view to Haggis's pumping. Haggis is pumping so hard he is going to go blind, yet you NEVER seem to correct him or set him on course. So no Alt, you don't ramp like he does, but you're definitely one of the team.

Garonne is entitled to share his views here without you and your team bullying him, and I am more than happy to have a dialogue with him around the concerns he raises, which are legitimate by the way.

Stop telling people what they can and can't post.

There he goes again, accusing people of 'Pumping and Dumping' without any proof whatsoever that transactions are involved, making snarky little comments, trying to maintain and 'manage' the board and the perceptions of people on it, whilst contributing a big fat ZERO to the conversation himself. You really are a funny little fellow Alt.

Alt - in case you don't get the message. IT IS OK TO BE AN INVESTOR AND EXPRESS YOUR OPINIONS ON THIS BOARD, EVEN IF SOME ARE CRITICAL. We don't need the self appointed ramping little bobby to pop every time he reads something that he thinks other people may consider as negative.

Definitely an Adam Bond employee.

Can you elaborate on that a little please Garonne?

‘Bondy the Capon returns LOL!’

I think you’re mistaking me for your father.

Hagis what a strange post. It seems to me you are of the assumption that me, and perhaps other people on this board have been calling out Bond for the drop in the shareprice.

Sensible posters will know that's not really what's been happening. I / we know the macro environment has dragged this down. That does NOT mean however, that we are impressed with Adam Bond. It's easy for you to exclaim that this is a win for Bond but it's not, it is, again, the market.

The questions on Bond still stand.

Yes, a feeble attempt at commercialisation by Adam Bond.

Alt - ExE still looks like an Adam Bond jolly to me, because no orders have been signed directly as a result. That might change soon and I will celebrate when it does. However, until then, and because of AB's track record maintain my suspicion that it was more of a jolly for him than something he managed to use to his advantage to get sales over the line. Currently, we have two single unit overdue orders, and one single unit deliverable for 2023.

Alt - Perhaps your next user name should be 'Big Sam' or 'Fergie'

"Sturm, I don't think a whatsapp group would work, since once you get too many people discussing points the threads just become unmanageable and hard to disentangle."

'Unmanageable' - meaning you can't 'manage' what is being written because it is too fast for you. I rest my case. Alt is the board 'manager'.

This is interesting when coupled with the US announcement Haggis.

I hope we can get chargers suitable for EV charging (could methanol work here without needing to be replaced?) to ABB to help capitalise on this.

I imagine China has plenty of remote areas where they could be useful. On china though, in the Liberum report, it said that AFC were not pursuing China as a market (risk to IP), but I guess that doesn't mean ABB wont.

There he goes again! The self appointed police man of this board that never contributes anything but post snide comments to people that don't follow the narrative he is trying to maintain on this board. Sad.

At least Haggis has posted a couple of reasonably interesting developments, related to shipping and ABB. What do you do exactly Alt? I have never read a piece of research or perspective from you. All you do is massage AB's sensitive areas all day long. In fact, I think you work for him.